Curious to see how orderly the Japanese react to disaster compared to say the American one after Katrina.
Both suffered from nature's wrath. Yet we see order and no looting in Japan, and chaos, corrupt cops leaving, looting, murder after Katrina.
What a difference.
When the big one hits L.A. it's going to be yet another compare/contrast to Japan.
Your comparing a hurricane to a tsunami?
I think the levels of destruction fail to fall into perspective of one another.
Were not talking about a country that was battered by winds and debris, destructive as it was, areas struck by the tsunami have been wiped clean off the fucking map!
Theres nothing to loot!
Good observation. What can be made of the initial aftermath of a leveled area other than there not being anything nor anyone. But if there is no order, stores abandoned...people without will take what they need and criminals will take what they want. Japan is not without criminals.
Read the National Response Framework and you would understand that responses go from local to state to regional and THEN Federal. The response to Katrina was not perfect, but politics played more into the blame game than the facts. The problem was that the local and state politicians did such a poor job of planning and execution that there WAS no local response and very little state assets into the NOLA area in the first 72 hours. By comparison, the MS coast was much harder hit, but the state did a MUCH better job of responding quickly because they were more prepared. :2 cents:
I have worked with the JSDF on emergency planning several times, they are doing better than any other country right now. They are well prepared, they are smart, they have a lot of resources, and best of all, their culture helps with an orderly response (which gets at what the OP meant with the thread).
There is a 'regional' level of g'ment now? Besides that C/S, relating some hierarchal response order does't put the reality in perspective. Meaning, just because there is some hierarchal structure presupposed doesn't mean in practice it went that way. Obviously the city level was incapacitated under the circumstances. The state level was hampered by deployment of it's National Guard and their equipment to Iraq.
Hence, your raising of the theoretical process of this hierarchal response suggests the Fed response was appropriately phased when in practice, their response should have been almost immediate under the circumstances. It wasn't.
That's one way of looking at it. However, we are comparing apples and oranges and this thread was created by the "centrist". There has to be a secret agenda.
:elaugh:
Yeah.
There's a word for "coming together" in Japan. Apparently that's how everyone is greeting each other currently due to the disaster. Individualism is looked down upon in Japan, instead the group is what matters.
Here in the US our culture is the opposite, the individual is the center. There are stories about the victims waiting for hours for food/water without fighting.
We'd have a near riot here.
Despite the differences both US and Japanese get through the crisis it's the way of doing so that is fascinating.
I'm not comparing the physical damage. However, a disaster is a disaster and it's interesting to see how two cultures deal with it that is interesting and quite revealing.
Ah..the double talking bait arises now. 'hours'???????? Who couldn't wait for hours?? The problem in NO was that people were waiting for days...while literally dying where they waited. The average human can only last for a few days without water. Then what are you going to do?
Although the devastation in Japan is horrendous and allot of people are suffering...at the time you posted this there was no effect of people suffering without a reasonable response for days (and days).
What made the 9/11 US public reaction(specifically New Yorkers) so similar to that of the Japanese?
We know the victim's reaction to Katrina in New Orleans. Why was that(reaction) so different from those in New York? Both are American, same culture etc?
Was it because in 9/11 for instance it was an attack against Americans and those in NY were all lumped together as such regardless of race, ethnicity, religion etc?
How does Japan's reverence for the sea play into the mindset of the people after the devastating tsunami?
Just throwing out questions and ideas.:dunno:
In both cases people were affected of different backgrounds. The difference was once 9/11 happened there wasn't any footage of what obviously needed to be done. During Katrina people could see for themselves individuals in desperate straits, there were first hand accounts of what was and wasn't happening. Law and order were gone in NO....that wasn't the case in NY. Although 9/11 was devastating from a morale standpoint, the average person in NY wasn't suffering dire straits and cooped up without simple drinking water.
You were right. He can't resist. He's a sneaky rat. :2 cents:
:hatsoff:
You're obviously going down another road. Please show where the comparison is BS?
All of my questions/points are valid.
See above and see below.
The reason I didn't include India or other countries was simply as an American and Katrina occurring in the U.S., I'm curious to the cultural differences between the aftermath to the hurricane disaster with what we see in Japan.
Of course there are many cultural differences between Japan and some areas of the US. None more apparent than some goofball chick on youtube ranting against 'Asians' at 'our' school when she probably needs to be spotted a few letters to spell her own name. While the 'Asians' (many of whom are Japanese) are too busy getting their grades to make excuses about who they can't understand.
It seems like an innocent question but I'm sure it isn't.
You still can't see the gorilla the "centrist" has put in the room.
Take a few moments to get to know trident. He's quite good but not good enough. :2 cents:
You're right. Racist? Probably not but certainly all the appearances of another bait thread.
Bait how so? Well, ol Trident soft serves some slow pitch softball then waits for some rant about how the people in NO are this and that pejorative leaning toward some racial or ethnic description and there you go...
Obviously it's as transparent as amoeba membrane but nonetheless some people see it as a rational comparison.
The more interesting thing you should be concerned for Trident is the willingness of the Japanese and TEPCO to be forthright and honest about what's going on at Fukushima. Try that for an American/Japanese comparison.