The sky is falling!!! Ahhh!!!
Ahhh ... I thought I'd just sit back and watch this. It's so much fun!
Seriously people, you watch too much network TV and other crap in the US.
Let's recap some of those "facts" that people don't like to talk about ...
1. After a full week, one worker has finally hit a grand total 0.1Sv of exposure. This is the legal limit he is allowed under Japanese law. It takes 1Sv to have radiation sickness. Japan has decided to extend the amount of 0.25Sv. Not sure I agree with the latter, but it seems necessary to allow responders to legally continue operations.
2. As water and pumping is restored to the waste storage and reactors, the facility is basically back to the same issues as when it was operational. That means it has materials that are cooled for many months, until their radioactivity is reduced. This would happen if the plant was operating nominally. The only difference here is that the reactors will no longer be used for power generation, because of their current conditions (obviously).
3. Dedicated storage facilities, like Yucca Mountain in the US, remove the need to store materials on-site at facilities. They solve a lot of issues. Not just for nuclear power plants, but for the 1-2 non-power issue of both prior nuclear weapons production as well as the 50+ years we've been creating medical devices and then trashing them. Japan doesn't have the former problem, but it has the latter. This doesn't begin and end with nuclear power for Japan any more than the US or any other western nation. So now the site is just a "storage facility." Guess what? It was already a "storage facility" (for its own, spent rods) like most all other, operating plants anyway!
4. The root cause of the failures of the coolant systems is still the storage of fuels above ground where the tsunami took them out. The reactors scrammed, output was reduced to 3% of nominal, the containment held and countless other things. This is not Chernobyl not in the least bit, or should I say, not in 97 bits out of 100.
5. The immediate plant is the only place where there is any issues, and that ends with #2. The remaining issues then become the clean-up of long-term, non-active materials that are basically heavy metals that you don't want to inhale or, more of a danger, consume. Which brings us to ...
6. There have been detections of both the iodine isotope and, in very rare but actual cases, at least a couple of our old friend Mr. 137. How much? So far one would have to consume 1kg of specific footstuffs every day for a whole year to have the equivalent creation of the same materials in their body to being zapped in a cat scan. Wow! Scary!
Seriously people. This isn't Chernobyl, which didn't scram and had no containment. It's the uber-hype of the media. No one will die outside of the plant ... ever ... and it seems that even the worker with the highest level of exposure has now only hit 0.1Sv.
To recap ...
- Japan had a 300 year quake
- It was at least a full order of magnitude worse than what the facilities were built for
- The facilities actually held up against the quake!
- The Japanese stupidly put their fuel for their cooling pumps above ground, and they were washed away by the tsunami
- The result was no coolant
- The GE design, which is not considered the best in a Gen-2 and not widely deployed in the US either, still actually held up against the lack of coolant!
- The design is from the '60s, started operating 40 years ago, and is what our parent's parent's designed having a whole 15 years of knowledge
At this point, again, I just can't believe how people have created the issue. Again we should have either banned nuclear power altogether in the '70s (ended all existing power generation), or built newer plants like the Gen-3 designs that don't rely on pumps for cooling. Instead, people acted like nuclear power didn't exist, or worse yet, kept consuming the energy created from it and acted like they didn't need it anyway.
This is why I honestly don't give a flying fuck what people think, because they just make the problem worse, instead of better. A great way people can help is to actually install solar power on their homes, so they have a great, point energy they can not only use, but feed back into the grid. I do so on my two homes myself.
In countries like France -- well, only France -- they actually kept up their innovation and knowledge. It can't happen their except for a few, very old installations that are going to be shutdown within the next decade.
Yes, I know, I'm nitpicking, but if I really didn't want to have fun, I wouldn't have quoted you and responded.
Ahhh ... I thought I'd just sit back and watch this. It's so much fun!
Seriously people, you watch too much network TV and other crap in the US.
Let's recap some of those "facts" that people don't like to talk about ...
1. After a full week, one worker has finally hit a grand total 0.1Sv of exposure. This is the legal limit he is allowed under Japanese law. It takes 1Sv to have radiation sickness. Japan has decided to extend the amount of 0.25Sv. Not sure I agree with the latter, but it seems necessary to allow responders to legally continue operations.
2. As water and pumping is restored to the waste storage and reactors, the facility is basically back to the same issues as when it was operational. That means it has materials that are cooled for many months, until their radioactivity is reduced. This would happen if the plant was operating nominally. The only difference here is that the reactors will no longer be used for power generation, because of their current conditions (obviously).
3. Dedicated storage facilities, like Yucca Mountain in the US, remove the need to store materials on-site at facilities. They solve a lot of issues. Not just for nuclear power plants, but for the 1-2 non-power issue of both prior nuclear weapons production as well as the 50+ years we've been creating medical devices and then trashing them. Japan doesn't have the former problem, but it has the latter. This doesn't begin and end with nuclear power for Japan any more than the US or any other western nation. So now the site is just a "storage facility." Guess what? It was already a "storage facility" (for its own, spent rods) like most all other, operating plants anyway!
4. The root cause of the failures of the coolant systems is still the storage of fuels above ground where the tsunami took them out. The reactors scrammed, output was reduced to 3% of nominal, the containment held and countless other things. This is not Chernobyl not in the least bit, or should I say, not in 97 bits out of 100.
5. The immediate plant is the only place where there is any issues, and that ends with #2. The remaining issues then become the clean-up of long-term, non-active materials that are basically heavy metals that you don't want to inhale or, more of a danger, consume. Which brings us to ...
6. There have been detections of both the iodine isotope and, in very rare but actual cases, at least a couple of our old friend Mr. 137. How much? So far one would have to consume 1kg of specific footstuffs every day for a whole year to have the equivalent creation of the same materials in their body to being zapped in a cat scan. Wow! Scary!
Seriously people. This isn't Chernobyl, which didn't scram and had no containment. It's the uber-hype of the media. No one will die outside of the plant ... ever ... and it seems that even the worker with the highest level of exposure has now only hit 0.1Sv.
To recap ...
- Japan had a 300 year quake
- It was at least a full order of magnitude worse than what the facilities were built for
- The facilities actually held up against the quake!
- The Japanese stupidly put their fuel for their cooling pumps above ground, and they were washed away by the tsunami
- The result was no coolant
- The GE design, which is not considered the best in a Gen-2 and not widely deployed in the US either, still actually held up against the lack of coolant!
- The design is from the '60s, started operating 40 years ago, and is what our parent's parent's designed having a whole 15 years of knowledge
At this point, again, I just can't believe how people have created the issue. Again we should have either banned nuclear power altogether in the '70s (ended all existing power generation), or built newer plants like the Gen-3 designs that don't rely on pumps for cooling. Instead, people acted like nuclear power didn't exist, or worse yet, kept consuming the energy created from it and acted like they didn't need it anyway.
This is why I honestly don't give a flying fuck what people think, because they just make the problem worse, instead of better. A great way people can help is to actually install solar power on their homes, so they have a great, point energy they can not only use, but feed back into the grid. I do so on my two homes myself.
No, they will just build a 20-30km wall around your house so people can't hear you scream this non-sense.I think - try to imagine - how that area will be when the meltdown is complete. Will they build a wall in a 20 or 30 kilometer radius around the nuclear site?
Yes, and this isn't Chernobyl. Chernobyl cannot happen in Japan or the US. Now in the UK, there are at least two candidate installations the last time I checked.Just saw a documentary about how the Chernobyl Disaster went down and how the area still suffers, 25 years later.
In countries like France -- well, only France -- they actually kept up their innovation and knowledge. It can't happen their except for a few, very old installations that are going to be shutdown within the next decade.
Yes, Russia wasn't the same after that because it wasn't in Russia.Russia never was the same after that, and to project that on a extremely smaller and much more dense habitated country is mindblowing.
Yes, I know, I'm nitpicking, but if I really didn't want to have fun, I wouldn't have quoted you and responded.
I feel that I'm going to just end it all one of these days, before mass ignorance destroys us all.But I feel somewhat tired by the permanent news stories, which sounds cruel, but I guess you feel it too.