Remember the key are the differences/similarities of the victims reactions to the disaster. You were trying unsuccessfully to say the NO shouldn't be used as a scenario because it wasn't as bad as Japan's disaster. Obvious cover for your unsuccessful attempt to paint this thread as racist. You struck out.
Keep trying Meg.....maybe one day you'll hit the ball.:1orglaugh
Feel free to start your own thread on basket weaving.
:1orglaughThis is the second time you've recorded 3 strikes off a single pitch.
Research your own thread before you boffo...:1orglaugh
With respect to whether this thread was 'racist' I specifically said it probably was not. :FACE-PALM:
As far as how the victims reacted to each circumstance, the point is moot IMO as the circumstances are different. The pics posted by U convey that quite clearly....
There are no Japanese stranded on rooftops, overpasses or in domed stadiums for days (and days). These people in the pics are sitting out able to manage albeit amongst almost total wreckage.
The quake and tsunami's effect was more devastating and offered those in their path far less opportunity to react ahead of time. That said, the practical peril and desperation for the Japanese survivors would appear less than what we saw in NO simply because the NO survivors were stranded for a much longer time before relief and rescue efforts reached them.
But your efforts to paint/bait this as a social experiment is another transparent, epic fail....:hatsoff: