I've watched more than any season since my Buckeyes went to the Championship game. Of course I have watched more becayse the Buckeyes are good again anf it is a tight race between the Sparty, the Boilers and my Buckeyes.
2009-2010 NCAA Basketball
- Thread starter turtle825
- Start date
This has been a painful season to watch being a Tar Heel fan.
Makes last year's championship even more sweeter.
We will be back .
Makes last year's championship even more sweeter.
We will be back .
Ace Bandage
The one and only.
I'm fuckin' mad, so I'm not going to say much. This year had so much promise before Rob went down. We're going to be lucky to make the Sweet 16 now. Speaking of 16, that's how many points we had in the second half. The offense has to come from somewhere. Who's going to step up for Purdue?
Since the Buckeyes are now set to be the #1 seed in the Big 10 Tournament, I'll patiently wait for your apology and retraction.
Ace Bandage
The one and only.
C'mon, man! You know that was in jest. And also, that's a low blow. If we still had Rob, the Boilers would be the #1 seed. A bit premature too, right? After all, your boys can still lose a game before the end of the season. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't count your chickens...
Of course a Buckeye might say that if they had Evan Turner to start the season, they would have not started 1-3 in conference play!
Regular season ends tonight for the Buckeyes. Illinois is in town.
Of course a Buckeye might say that if they had Evan Turner to start the season, they would have not started 1-3 in conference play!
Great Point.
I think Ohio State is WAAAY underrated. With a few upsets, they could still earn a Number 1 seed in the NCAAs if they take both Regular Season and tournament Big Ten titles. Its unlikely, but possible.
Is there anyone who thinks expanding the tourney to 90 some teams is a good idea?
Not me. 65 is good enough for me.
65 is just fine. Instead of putting teams like binghamton and other high school quality teams in the tournament, put in the teams that deserve it from the major conferences and stop bitching about those teams not making it.
the Nba should have a roster spot open for players who are not seleted in the draft. So they have to work with a player who doesn't make it.
This thread is about college basketball, BUT why should the NBA pay players who are not good enough to play in the NBA?
They need an summer league. For sure thats whats up
Oh about that the nba needs a spot to mix the rotation up a bit who needs an extra guard anyone they always have 3 and they always have other players sho rarely play. Why don't they. It would make the game more interesting and actually give some new names a chance to play. It wouldn't hurt the franchice salary cap if thats what your asking?
Because they are not good enough to play!
I am saying: First this is a college basketball thread.
Second, since there are already players on NBA rosters that are not good enough to get playing time (unless there are injuries) why in the world does it make sense to expand the rooster to include more players who are not good enough to play?
Why would I want to see the NBA “give some new names a chance to play" as opposed to seeing the best players play?
Similar threads
