I have said before and i will say it again there should be a rep almost meter were i have like 367 rep points i should be able to rep anywhere from from 1-367....
wlfman812 said:I'm not sure I made my point clear... It's not that the POINTS or SYSTEM is meaningless...it's the congrats themselves...
To overstate my point...imagine if we created a thread for every 25 point increment. Everytime someone hit 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and so on...there would be a new thread and a fresh round of 'Congrats'! That would get REALLY tedious and cumbersome VERY quickly.
Like I said...That's a bit of hyperbole to make a point...but not all that far off in principle. I guess what it boils down to for me is...I think it's awesome that people hit 100, 200, 300, 700 rep...but I'm probably going to reach a point where I won't be viewing or posting in any thread under 500...
I hope that clarifies the point I was intending to make.
Ummm....IFY:dunno: It was cool at first congratulating jod and the trailing members once they broke a new number, and deserved its recognition. Maybe something like close the ones in the Members only thread, and then just have a rep congrats thread in the games section:2 cents:BNF said:So what do you all think of moving the Rep Congrats threads to the Games section??
BNF said:So what do you all think of moving the Rep Congrats threads to the Games section??
wlfman812 said:I hadn't thought of that...and not sure that's necessary. :dunno:
LOL...feel like I opened a major can of worms here...and feeling somewhat regretful that I did...
BNF said:So what do you all think of moving the Rep Congrats threads to the Games section??
Well thought out poggy, but a bit off the off-topic discussion that is taking place about what to do about all the congrats threads.poggy1 said:Here's a problem as I see it.
Like I said to Jod yesterday I was looking at my rep list in my profile.I had 14 new reps in just over 24hrs.Now in these 14 every other one was from a new member who'd only made a few posts and had no rep.The other 7 was from regular members who was repping me with things like 'rep bump' and things.
Now the new members or the ones with no rep was repping me for a post I made and liked it.But they had no rep to give me and most didn't even know that there rep bump was a nil.They actually thought they'ed given me some rep.
Now what I'm saying is there should be a max and a min to new or old members alike.So you can pick between these numbers just exactly what you want to rep them.This doesn't matter if you have 400+ rep stones and been here for 2-3 years or a newbie.You can only rep them between the same as a new member.:2 cents:
americanharley said:Well thought out poggy, but a bit off the off-topic discussion that is taking place about what to do about all the congrats threads.
Well ideas for rep restrictions have fallen on deaf ears, and the question still stands as to what to do with the congrats threads.poggy1 said:No this is on topic and this is why.
If people could only rep let say a min of 50,a max of 200.The rep would be harder to earn so there wouldn't be someone entering a congrats thread every couple of hours.As which seems to be happening at the moment.
americanharley said:Well ideas for rep restrictions have fallen on deaf ears, and the question still stands as to what to do with the congrats threads.
Seems excessive, and would almost become the same as the following of each hundred rep thread.poggy1 said:Easy this one 250,500,1000,1500,2000,3000 and so on.It is that simple and have them in members only.