no. people is the key word. not phrase. you highlighted for the people. i think by the people is far more important.
Golly, ya got me. People, indeed, is not a phrase. It's just the key concept of that entire phrase.
no. people is the key word. not phrase. you highlighted for the people. i think by the people is far more important.
Hi Poggy,I can't see in what way it will effect them from doing their jobs. As if it isn't effecting the quality of the work they're turning out I just can't see the problem. Like if a person of high office has an affair. If it doesn't effect their job and they continue to perform to good ability or of a level required there shouldn't be a problem.
This is just closed minded people in a modern society trying to live in a era of a bygone year. These are the ones still trying to burn books and censor what people see. If it hasn't effected how they do their jobs let them be is what I say.
To me that really depends on whether the person posing nude, or partially nude as it would be, in some kind of uniform. I'm fine with people wanting to pose nude for whatever magazine or TV-show, but I also think that companies or institutions have the right to demand that they aren't made a part of it, by not allowing any such uniforms, company car or whatever, to be used. And there could probably be many more factors involved that I've not thought of yet.Question is it alright for a shop worker, office worker, hair dresser, etc to pose nude ?
Most people will answer yes to this.
To me that really depends on whether the person posing nude, or partially nude as it would be, in some kind of uniform. I'm fine with people wanting to pose nude for whatever magazine or TV-show, but I also think that companies or institutions have the right to demand that they aren't made a part of it, by not allowing any such uniforms, company car or whatever, to be used. And there could probably be many more factors involved that I've not thought of yet.
Another question: Where do we draw the line for how much of the things done in your personal time, we are willing to accept from a person in a certain job or position?
So you take just a little of my post to try to make it look like I said something totally different. Like it :1orglaugh
But models pose in uniforms all the time. How do we know they don't actually wear the same thing in real life. Or used too at least.
Like I said if it's not effecting their performance in their job, there shouldn't be a problem.
Yeah. Accuse someone else of laziness "because they were high" whilst claiming the moral high ground yourself. Did you forget/didn't-read the part where I saidLike you obviously know what I've done? But then again, I wasn't talking the big talk was I? Yes, pot, kettle, black indeed
(emphases mine)Like obviously you KNOW what he has or has not done for this country.
Splendid point.But models pose in uniforms all the time. How do we
know they don't actually wear the same thing in real life. Or used too at least.
Yeah. Accuse someone else of laziness "because they were high" whilst claiming the moral high ground yourself. Did you forget/didn't-read the part where I said (emphases mine)
Very consistent of you!
Splendid point.
You're right - for a civillian to tell the difference, it is hard.
But for a veteran, it isn't.
All "movies"/"plays" etc. that try and attempt a realistic portrayal of soliders in their uniforms have to get permission from Command. I know someone suggested the earlier "example" of porno jocks in "fatigues" ---- yet no one noticed that the same "jocks" were NOT in "military uniform"... but wearing simple camo fatigues. With a dearth of insignia to boot!
But the question here isn't that. The argument here is that a Non Commisioned Officer of the armed forces, took it upon herself to break a code she knew she was supposed to uphold.
You can argue if it was a worthwhile code to uphold - but you cannot argue that she didn't "break any laws".
cheers,
Why is it that just about every new thread ends in an arguement or knock down brawl?
Why is it that just about every new thread ends in an arguement or knock down brawl?
because some people don't know how to self moderate themselves.Why is it that just about every new thread ends in an arguement or knock down brawl?
because some people don't know how to self moderate themselves.