. . .in a cold wet bucket. Pain it's first & last momentary sensation of existence! :elaugh:I see this thread dying like a fetus in the very near future.....
Ever heard of adoption? There's a long list of people waiting to adopt, and meanwhile, they have no issue with importing kids from some Third World shithole somewhere. There are other options than just the "black" and "white" - keep or destroy.
I'm still pissed at my parents for fucking.
....So are we Ike, so are we.
....So are we Ike, so are we.
More pissed at your parents though. I'm checking to see if they'll consent to a post natal abortion.
The Freeones Message Board, ladies and gentlemen.You seem to have a very jaded, or negative view on the rest of the world. I'd almost venture to say its a hateful view on the rest of the world.
Willful ignorance is pretty big here.Can I ask why you have such negative feelings towards Third World countries, or anywhere other than your own home country? I'm genuinely curious.
Can I ask why you have such negative feelings towards Third World countries, or anywhere other than your own home country? I'm genuinely curious.
A recent report from the Pew Global Attitudes Project found that "the US image is much stronger in Africa than in other regions of the world". At least 80 per cent of respondents in Ghana, Kenya and Cote d'Ivoire were favourable to the US. In all other sub-Saharan African countries polled, there were more "favourables" than "non-favourables". Part of the reason for that support is money. Lots of it.
When President Bush came to power in 2001, the US spent $1.4bn a year on humanitarian and development aid in Africa. By 2006, the figure had quadrupled to $5.6bn a year. And it is likely to get bigger. The centrepiece of Mr Bush's aid to Africa is the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (Pepfar), a five-year, $15bn Aids prevention and treatment programme launched in 2003. His most recent budget proposes doubling the funding to $30bn over the next five years.
Despite rows over the programme's emphasis on abstinence and faithfulness to one partner rather than condoms to control Aids, it has helped to fund anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs for 1.3 million people across the continent. Before, the US funded ARV treatment for just 50,000 people.
Taken alongside US funding for malaria prevention, plus the Millennium Challenge Accounts, which provide funding for countries with strong governance records, Mr Bush has done more for Africa than any other US president
I believe any woman who gets an abortion should have her tubes tied on the spot.
I believe any woman who gets an abortion should have her tubes tied on the spot. If you're not responsible enough to keep from getting pregnant in the first place and abort the baby then you shouldn't have another chance to have one later on in life, unless the pregnancy was a result of rape.
I just read this article a few weeks ago http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/new_york&id=7883827. That is a staggering amount of abortions, and the article says that number is actually down from 12 years ago
Women who are stupid enough to get pregnant more than a couple times though, SHOULD be neutered.
Forced sterilization... one of the darkest chapters in modern history that didn't stem from nazi germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization
The only thing abortions may cause for others apart from the mother is a mild annoyance and some cost. You cannot say "Ok, we're gonna make you unable to have babies now because we're so bloody annoyed at you running here all the time".
If it irks you that some women are serial abortionists, so be it... but that alone is no reason to force such a medial procedure on someone.
To put it in perspective: what is someone said "Because you do adult modelling, you're probably unfit as a mother... so we're gonna tie your tubes now. We have just decided you shall not have children".
/S
Not sure where it would be going, but it would be taking place in an abortion clinic. . .& we'd all be chugging down a few brews! Chug! Chug! Chug!How do you think this conversation would be going if men were the ones to carry the fetus?
How do you think this conversation would be going if men were the ones to carry the fetus?
Forced sterilization... one of the darkest chapters in modern history that didn't stem from nazi germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization
The only thing abortions may cause for others apart from the mother is a mild annoyance and some cost. You cannot say "Ok, we're gonna make you unable to have babies now because we're so bloody annoyed at you running here all the time".
If it irks you that some women are serial abortionists, so be it... but that alone is no reason to force such a medial procedure on someone.
To put it in perspective: what is someone said "Because you do adult modelling, you're probably unfit as a mother... so we're gonna tie your tubes now. We have just decided you shall not have children".
/S
Sure maybe things might change in the future, but should innocent children continually be concieved and aborted, and government dollars be wasted on someone who is too stupid to keep on the pill or use rubbers? I think not.