Who are you voting/rooting for in this years election

Who are you voting/rooting for?

  • Democrats: John Kerry/John Edwards

    Votes: 64 57.1%
  • Republicans: George W. Bush/Dick Cheney

    Votes: 35 31.3%
  • Reform Party: Ralph Nader/Peter Camejo

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Green Party: David Cobb/Pat LaMarche

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Other third party canidate

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • No one

    Votes: 9 8.0%

  • Total voters
    112
Status
Not open for further replies.

georges

Moderator
Staff member

Brino

Banned
Dirty Sanchez said:
Interesting Brino. Nice to see the Democrates are altering/falsifing documents and images again to try and make their opponents look bad. BTW, the "girlie-men" comments was made by a Republican, and it was directed at Democrates who waver like a small tree in the wind.

I refer you to the above post!
 
Once again you prove that you dont know anything about America!

Brino:

what is it about America that he doesn't know when he asserts that Americans do not change their mind very often when they have something they strongly believe in. Seems like a valid and accurate statement to me. Care to elaborate on your assesment of his knowledge of America? I hope so because if he's off base I would like to learn from you the real truth.

It boils down to this:

Kerry has a solution to everything as long as there is a bottomless pit of money to pay for it all.

Bush has no solution to anything AND he's spending all the money out of that bottomless pit before anyone else can get to it.

Either way we're fucked but I'm voting for Bush for no other reason that the fact that Kerry is so non specific in his ideas and so dull that it appears to me he may be suffering from the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Eat meat, smoke fatties, and pave the earth.

:beer: :beer: :beer:
 
Peter Gazinya said:
Either way we're fucked but I'm voting for Bush for no other reason that the fact that Kerry is so non specific in his ideas and so dull that it appears to me he may be suffering from the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

I didn't know dullness was a symptom of Alzheimer's. Shit, probably half the people I know have Alzheimer's then.
 
Ranger said:
:confused:

(Image of Kerry on Vietnamese Currency)

Ranger

You know what really makes me sad about this? In twenty years, our soldiers who are fighting now will be back home, some of them will run for public office, and some classless asshole will make jokes about how they were fighting on al Qaeda's side.
 

Brino

Banned
Peter Gazinya said:
Brino:

what is it about America that he doesn't know when he asserts that Americans do not change their mind very often when they have something they strongly believe in. Seems like a valid and accurate statement to me. Care to elaborate on your assesment of his knowledge of America? I hope so because if he's off base I would like to learn from you the real truth.

It boils down to this:

Kerry has a solution to everything as long as there is a bottomless pit of money to pay for it all.

Bush has no solution to anything AND he's spending all the money out of that bottomless pit before anyone else can get to it.

Either way we're fucked but I'm voting for Bush for no other reason that the fact that Kerry is so non specific in his ideas and so dull that it appears to me he may be suffering from the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Eat meat, smoke fatties, and pave the earth.

:beer: :beer: :beer:

I'm trying to remember what I wrote that about but if I remember correctly I think I was talking about the fact that a lot of people who didnt vote last time will vote this time. Plus I think I was also talking about the innaccuracy of polling. I wasnt talking about people changing their minds when they believe strongly in something even though it may have seemed that way.

btw So your voting for Bush because Kerry hasnt given specifics on his policies? Here's the way I see it, I know Bush's policies and they suck so Kerry's policies have got to be better! The truth of the matter is that Bush hasnt given specifics on his policies either, if he has then please enlighten me as to what they are. The only one I know of is "Bring em' on" which wasnt very smart of him to say! Goading the enemy is never smart to do!
 
Brino said:
Here's the way I see it, I know Bush's policies and they suck so Kerry's policies have got to be better! The truth of the matter is that Bush hasnt given specifics on his policies either, if he has then please enlighten me as to what they are.

That is the dumbest decsion I have ever heard. Bush has his proven record of leading a State, and a Country. Kerry, does not. He has yet to prove he can, and will fail miserably. The World has changed. We need strong leaders, not "nice guys"

The only one I know of is "Bring em' on" which wasnt very smart of him to say! Goading the enemy is never smart to do!

You are nuts. You can't run, or be afraid of these people. Strength my friend, strength. Bring it on his far better then Kerry's stance. Give no money to the troops, and tell them what they are foing is wrong, and giving hope to the terrorists they can go back to threatening the world.
 

Brino

Banned
Dirty Sanchez said:
That is the dumbest decsion I have ever heard. Bush has his proven record of leading a State, and a Country. Kerry, does not. He has yet to prove he can, and will fail miserably. The World has changed. We need strong leaders, not "nice guys"

Your right Bush does have a proven record, a proven record of being a fuck up!

You are nuts. You can't run, or be afraid of these people. Strength my friend, strength. Bring it on his far better then Kerry's stance. Give no money to the troops, and tell them what they are foing is wrong, and giving hope to the terrorists they can go back to threatening the world.

And you are wrong! Goading the enemy is never a smart thing to do with terrorists, it will only incense them further and make them more determined! I never said show weakness, I just said it's not smart to goad them! And please tell me how goading somebody is a sign of strength.

Give the troops no money? Arent you forgetting who sent them over there in the first place with faulty equipment! Bush sent them over there with faulty body armor and Humvess that werent armored! You blame Kerry for not supporting our troops but you completly ignore the fact that Bush has done more to not support our troops than anybody else. Get your facts straight!
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Brino said:
Your right Bush does have a proven record, a proven record of being a fuck up!

And you are wrong! Goading the enemy is never a smart thing to do with terrorists, it will only incense them further and make them more determined! I never said show weakness, I just said it's not smart to goad them! And please tell me how goading somebody is a sign of strength.

Give the troops no money? Arent you forgetting who sent them over there in the first place with faulty equipment! Bush sent them over there with faulty body armor and Humvess that werent armored! You blame Kerry for not supporting our troops but you completly ignore the fact that Bush has done more to not support our troops than anybody else. Get your facts straight!

kerry is a saint for you? someone who lied and cheated for his medals and made an anti vietnam war pinko leftist commie campaign can't be a saint. kerry also voted against the acquisition of latest weapons when he was senator, so who has a fucked up record and is a coward?Answer is kerry

being peaceful with terrorists doesn't help. killing the terrorists till the last one is the solution.Trying peaceful talks and giving terrorists money is like surreneering it is a sign of weakness and fear.

Faulty equipement?Wtf are you saying.US army Hummvees have bullet proof body shell till caliber 50browning but they won't resist to rpg 7 rocket launchers.Faulty body armor where
did you read that bullshit? Do you have proofs about what you are talking?Or are you just mudslinging the us army suppliers.
Kerry wouldn't have done nothing against Saddam he would have prefered to see Saddam at power. Saddam was threat and he needed to be removed.
Before saying crap on us army equipement get serious proofs and facts, otherwise don't spread bull shit.
 
Last edited:
Agreed, Puffy and Bigdan: Polls are bullshit.

Inspector: Amen!

George: Give the "lied about his medals" thing a break. It's just plain wrong. How did he "lie"?

Re: The hv armor: Here's your "proofs"
http://www.boston.com/news/world/mi...03/08/iraq_death_spurs_push_for_humvee_armor/

Or how about the numerous letters from ACTUAL GUYS IN THE FIELD published in "Will They Ever Trust Us Again?"

Since the discussion has taken a decidedly macho, draw a line in the sand, bring it on tone:

Country Club Swagger
It doesn't matter if you're left or right. Bush is an embarrassment to real men.
BY PETE KOTZ

The man on TV swaggers like he's undefeated in 57 Collinwood bar fights. He threatens, he talks big, he's fearless. His are the pronouncements of a badass.

Meet George Bush, consummate man.

It's a noble thing he seeks. While the Manly Man has fallen from fashion, replaced by The Sensitive Guy who can cook a five-course meal while discussing his feelings of inadequacy, the rules for real men have been around for thousands of years, and they've always been simple and good:

You work hard. You provide. You look out for the weak and speak when everyone else is afraid. You make your shoulders available to those who need carrying.

It doesn't matter who you are or what you do. This is the one-size-fits-all path to honor.

Unfortunately, Bush, like so many others, confuses attitude with masculinity.

Jesus understood the rules. Now here was one tough sonuvabitch. He knew that to be a real man is to sacrifice, to walk it like you talk it, not wear it on your sleeve.

But Bush grew up with the trust-fund set, where no one knew the traditional ways. So he adopted the fraudulent version, like the gangbanger who waves a gun and thinks he's big, yet carries no one, provides for no one. This, unfortunately, is the definition of a punk.

If Bush understood the rules, there would be no swagger. The toughest fight of his life probably came in the third grade, when a tall girl kicked his ass and the Secret Service came to the rescue. The guy never earned his bones.

If Bush was a real man, he'd keep his sights on the real enemy, Osama, not pick an easier, more convenient fight with Saddam. It's like the guy who's called out by a big man in a bar, but decides to beat up a midget in the parking lot instead.

It was no sin to seek revenge on Saddam, who tried to kill his father. Real men understand the beauty, the necessity, of vengeance. But Bush had his chance before the war, when Saddam challenged him to a duel. A real man would have relished the opportunity, demanding to fight with knives, so he could kill Saddam up close, with his own hand. Yet Bush was a coward, choosing instead to burn 1,000 American lives and billions of American dollars, then play the cheerleader from thousands of miles away, lauding the heroics of men and women who were brave enough to do what he would not. A real man would never say "bring 'em on" from the safety of the sidelines.

If Bush was a real man, he would kick his swift-boat lapdogs in the head. It was no sin to stay clear of Vietnam; it wasn't our fight. But a real man never calls out the courage of those who went, and he sure as hell doesn't let his lapdogs do it. He does it himself, face to face.

If Bush was a real man, he wouldn't side with pharmaceutical companies against grandmas who can't afford medicine. There's only one choice in this fight: You go with Grandma. A real man would rather stick his face in an arc welder than abet the suffering of old people.

If Bush was a real man, he wouldn't run up deficits like a trophy wife. He'd respect and fear debt for the curse it is. He'd understand that he must pay his own way, leave a little extra for his children. Only a trust-fund kid believes he can spend without borders, knowing that someone else will pay.

If Bush was a real man, he wouldn't talk about the economy rising. He'd understand that a man's highest calling is a real job, with real pay, so he can put food on the table of his children, a roof over the head of his wife. He'd know that everything else is bullshit.

If Bush was a real man, he'd never pick a fight with gays. He'd understand the embarrassment in beating down those without power. It's like punching out a guy in a wheelchair, then pretending you're Shaka Zulu.

If Bush was a real man, he'd know there's no honor in being a country club tough guy, one who believes the work of men is to rattle their lips, then play another round of golf. He'd also know there's no righteousness in following the badass CEO model, guys who lays off hundreds to Wall Street cheers for making the tough call, but never do any of this face-to-face, and never put themselves on the line.

Because if Bush was a real man, he'd know this code transcends left and right, rich and poor. It's been around forever, and has nothing to do with the squawking parrots in the Capitol or on cable. It's about standing up. Doing what's right. Honor.

And if Bush was a real man, he'd know that even an Ivy League cheerleader can achieve it. All you gotta do is try.

But if Bush was a real man, he'd man up right quick. Because he'd know he's embarrassing us right now.
 

Brino

Banned
georges said:
kerry is a saint for you? someone who lied and cheated for his medals and made an anti vietnam war pinko leftist commie campaign can't be a saint. kerry also voted against the acquisition of latest weapons when he was senator, so who has a fucked up record and is a coward?Answer is kerry

being peaceful with terrorists doesn't help. killing the terrorists till the last one is the solution.Trying peaceful talks and giving terrorists money is like surreneering it is a sign of weakness and fear.

Faulty equipement?Wtf are you saying.US army Hummvees have bullet proof body shell till caliber 50browning but they won't resist to rpg 7 rocket launchers.Faulty body armor where
did you read that bullshit? Do you have proofs about what you are talking?Or are you just mudslinging the us army suppliers.
Kerry wouldn't have done nothing against Saddam he would have prefered to see Saddam at power. Saddam was threat and he needed to be removed.
Before saying crap on us army equipement get serious proofs and facts, otherwise don't spread bull shit.

Ive learned to ignore you georges because all you do is babble crap! If you want proof then get off your ass and look it up yourself!
 
Dirty Sanchez said:
That is the dumbest decsion I have ever heard. Bush has his proven record of leading a State, and a Country. Kerry, does not. He has yet to prove he can, and will fail miserably. The World has changed. We need strong leaders, not "nice guys"
[/B]

arent you canadian?
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Brino said:
Ive learned to ignore you georges because all you do is babble crap! If you want proof then get off your ass and look it up yourself!

you post bullshit with these childish links and tend to pass moore's movies for the truth. so who is babling crap you.i don't how reliable is foxfilm's link. i don't know if it is a not supporting democrat newspaper but i bet it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top