Who are you voting/rooting for in this years election

Who are you voting/rooting for?

  • Democrats: John Kerry/John Edwards

    Votes: 64 57.1%
  • Republicans: George W. Bush/Dick Cheney

    Votes: 35 31.3%
  • Reform Party: Ralph Nader/Peter Camejo

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Green Party: David Cobb/Pat LaMarche

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Other third party canidate

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • No one

    Votes: 9 8.0%

  • Total voters
    112
Status
Not open for further replies.
georges said:
Count how much childish pics of bush you posted and how much childish pics of kerry you posted.Don't forget the stupid childish games and do the math you posted more childish shit on Bush than Kerry so you are wrong again.

Man you really don't get it Georges...
Bush is THE president, its just normal that people post more funny stuff about him, if Kerry was president, than, people would post more stuff about Kerry.

When Clinton was the president, a lot of joke and funny pictures were floating around...

So don't worry Georges, when Kerry is elected in a few weeks, you're gonna see less and less joke about your little Dubya... :D
 
Dirty Sanchez said:
Oh, so were back to believing polls again are we?

Good, elect the guy who can talk the talk, but can't walk the walk.

Go ahead, elect the guy who did a better job dancing around the issues. Michael Moore is right, American's are stupid.



I already know that americans are stupid, they will be even stupider if they reelect Bush...
 

Brino

Banned
georges said:
Count how much childish pics of bush you posted and how much childish pics of kerry you posted.Don't forget the stupid childish games and do the math you posted more childish shit on Bush than Kerry so you are wrong again.

Stop being stupid georges. The question was whether I had ever made fun of John Kerry and I have. This ratio crap is just that, crap.
 

Brino

Banned
Dirty Sanchez said:
Point being Brino, running for a seat in the Senate, is no where close to being as big as running to be the POTUS. The fact that you don't realize that, is really quite pathetic

Did you even read what I posted? Can you even read?
 
sigh.gif
 
bigdan1110 said:
I already know that americans are stupid, they will be even stupider if they reelect Bush...

My questions will be " Did you vote for Mr Chretien?" or "Have you ever voted?".
How can you say that people are stupid just because they elect someone they must be stupid? What a fucked up logic.
People elect who they find right for leading their country and a lot of people don't like leaders changing their positions every day (flip floppers).
 
bigdan1110 said:
Man you really don't get it Georges...
Bush is THE president, its just normal that people post more funny stuff about him, if Kerry was president, than, people would post more stuff about Kerry.

When Clinton was the president, a lot of joke and funny pictures were floating around...

So don't worry Georges, when Kerry is elected in a few weeks, you're gonna see less and less joke about your little Dubya... :D

I see more shit on Bush than on Clinton to be honest.
How can you be so sure that Kerry will be reelected? According to your crystal ball
You don't know who will be reelected.
 
Brino said:
Stop being stupid georges. The question was whether I had ever made fun of John Kerry and I have. This ratio crap is just that, crap.

Yes but you posted more shit on bush than on kerry.
 
Brino said:
Did you even read what I posted? Can you even read?

You asked why nobody brought up Kerry's past while he was running for a seat in the Senate (funny, I could ask why nobody brought up Bush's time in the Air National Guard when he was running for Governor of the State of Texas, a far more powerful position then a lowly Senate job).

The point is, you think that running for a seat in the Senate is on the same level as running to be the President of the United States. Why did no one look into Kerry's war record? Because, to my knowledge, he had yet to say he was a better candidate to be POTUS because he was a war hero, because he was running to be in the Senate.

Listen, I really don't care what either one of them did back then, it's a non starter with me. But when a guy say's he'd be better at the job because of what he did back then, only to find out he was lying, then it becomes an issue. You know Bush wasn't going to bring it up, but when Kerry did, he was fair game. And instead of saying, hey, we made a mistake, they start going after Bush's record. Hello, Bush never once used that time in his life as a reason you should vote for him.


bigdan1110 said:
What do you mean exactly by that ?

I'm sorry, i'm stupid, i don't understand what you said...

Dan, people from Quebec, who vote either Liberal or Bloc don't have the right to call anybody else stupid for who they voted for. Now, if you say you didn't vote for either of those two, and the vote you cast was for someone else, please, let me know and I might pull a Kerry and reverse my position. Of course, I'm doing it because of new information I might receive, not because it's Thursday.
 
georges said:
My questions will be " Did you vote for Mr Chretien?" or "Have you ever voted?".
How can you say that people are stupid just because they elect someone they must be stupid? What a fucked up logic.
People elect who they find right for leading their country and a lot of people don't like leaders changing their positions every day (flip floppers).

I never vote for Chretien, i've always voted Bloc Québeçois.

That's why i say that stupid peoples elected stupid leaders, and stop saying Kerry is a flip flopper, because Bush is one too, he change is mind on the 9/11 commission, and lot of others things too... Also you say Kerry is a liar, Bush is a liar too, Nader is a liar too, EVERY POLITICIAN is a liar, so stop with the lying crap... so if you can't say Kerry is a flip flopper and a liar, what he is ??
 
Dirty Sanchez said:

Dan, people from Quebec, who vote either Liberal or Bloc don't have the right to call anybody else stupid for who they voted for. Now, if you say you didn't vote for either of those two, and the vote you cast was for someone else, please, let me know and I might pull a Kerry and reverse my position. Of course, I'm doing it because of new information I might receive, not because it's Thursday.

Like i just said to Georges, i've always voted Bloc, i don't know why you think i said that i've not vote liberal or Bloc...

I've vote for them, because they well represent the intention of quebecers in general, if it wasn't for the minorities, Quebec would already be a country right now. But again, the subject is'nt the independance of Quebece, its the american election.
 
bigdan1110 said:
Like i just said to Georges, i've always voted Bloc, i don't know why you think i said that i've not vote liberal or Bloc...

You say if Americans vote for Bush they're stupid, yet you fully admit you voted for the Bloc?!?!?! Jesus Christ Dan!! I would rather vote Kerry or Michael Moore for my leader then anyone in the Bloc party. From here on out, there is no reason why any one should take anything you say concerning politics seriously.

I've vote for them, because they well represent the intention of quebecers in general, if it wasn't for the minorities, Quebec would already be a country right now.

You want independance, move to France. Otherwise, you are a Canadian, respect the flag and the nation you frog pussy.

But again, the subject is'nt the independance of Quebece, its the american election.

Independance eh? Give us back our land we gave you after kicking your ass. Give us back all the things the Canadian tax payer has provided for you, and take your share of the deficit. Oh, and give it 5 years before the US takes you over. You think you'll still be allowed to keep a job if the only language you speak is french when you become the 51st state.

Fucking piece of shit you are Dan. Go move to Iraq you coward.

so if you can't say Kerry is a flip flopper and a liar, what he is ??


A flip flopper, deal with it.
 
:wtf: Sanchez, at least i try to remain polite, from now on, i will just ignore all your post, at least you should respect opinion of other, in the last referendum we came 1 fucking percent close of having our country and the fact that you respond like this to me, make me wonder why you even want us in YOUR country bastard ! :mad: Now do me a pleasure and go fuck yourself :thefinger .
 
bigdan1110 said:
:wtf: Sanchez, at least i try to remain polite, from now on, i will just ignore all your post, at least you should respect opinion of other, in the last referendum we came 1 fucking percent close of having our country and the fact that you respond like this to me, make me wonder why you even want us in YOUR country bastard ! :mad: Now do me a pleasure and go fuck yourself :thefinger .

You insulted people who voted for bush so how did you remain polite?By no way you remained polite.You seem to glorify Kerry.But kerry changes his positions every day that is why he is a flip flopper.Bush at least exactly acts and does what he says.
Last point there are often conflicts between Americans and Canadians and there are also conflicts and severe disagreements between Americans and French.
 
georges said:
You insulted people who voted for bush so how did you remain polite?By no way you remained polite.You seem to glorify Kerry.But kerry changes his positions every day that is why he is a flip flopper.Bush at least exactly acts and does what he says.
Last point there are often conflicts between Americans and Canadians and there are also conflicts and severe disagreements between Americans and French.

Just because i support Kerry, you think that i glorify the guy... well i just want to tell you one more time, i don't care who's running against Bush, i just want him gone, they could put anyone else in Kerry's place i would still vote against Bush.
 

Brino

Banned
Dirty Sanchez said:
You asked why nobody brought up Kerry's past while he was running for a seat in the Senate (funny, I could ask why nobody brought up Bush's time in the Air National Guard when he was running for Governor of the State of Texas, a far more powerful position then a lowly Senate job).

The point is, you think that running for a seat in the Senate is on the same level as running to be the President of the United States. Why did no one look into Kerry's war record? Because, to my knowledge, he had yet to say he was a better candidate to be POTUS because he was a war hero, because he was running to be in the Senate.

Listen, I really don't care what either one of them did back then, it's a non starter with me. But when a guy say's he'd be better at the job because of what he did back then, only to find out he was lying, then it becomes an issue. You know Bush wasn't going to bring it up, but when Kerry did, he was fair game. And instead of saying, hey, we made a mistake, they start going after Bush's record. Hello, Bush never once used that time in his life as a reason you should vote for him.


Bullshit! I never said that running for president was on the same level as running for the Senate, infact I said the opposite. My point was, and still is, why did nobody criticize Kerry's record when he ran for senate? You have yet to give me a valid answer. This crap that a Senate seat elction isnt worth criticizing Kerry's record is just an excuse. If these guys hated Kerry so much as to think he's a traitor then they would have brought this crap up when he ran for the senate regardless of how important a senate seat is, but they didn't because their lying for partisan motives.
 
Dirty Sanchez said:
If there were CIA agents there (which from the people I heard speak who actually proved they were there) said there were none. The bigger issue was that they weren't sent in before the Military arrived to do more prep work. That is what truly bothered that guy named Major General Garrison



Intel would have been the problem if the best chances they had at accomplish their mission was to begin it in the afternoon. Many soldiers felt that mission was forced into actions because of the lack of success they had had to that date.



And then what happened? You packed up and left. Clinton didn't provide you the right equipment or specialists, and then when things went bad, he pulled away, giving bin laden a new hope in defeating the US.



The decision was based on the nightly news coverage of American bodies being dragged around the street., The public out cry forced Clinton to pull out before more dead Americans were shown on TV, He caved, and again, gave bin laden hope and desire.


Horseshit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top