lol....banned for what? it's an opinion, you fascist liberal. suppose you would preffer to do away with freedom of speech like a good fascist.
take your pick: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Islamic+Hate+Speech+&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
I suppose you'll pull out the Tim McVeigh line of arguing next? well, that's ONE domestic terrorist, as opposed to the weekly Middle East blasts that go off taking out hundreds at a time. damn, can't go a week without someone in the ME strapping an IED or other device to themselves - that's sure peaceful.
nothin' like a good old fashioned stoning, eh?: http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/stoning.htm gotta love that peaceful religion.
Wow, alright....
You can pick out passages of a similar magnitude to that in the Bible and in the Torah. They're all based on the same myths, so why are those of the muslim faith any different. Is it just because those who adhere to that particular belief are usually of a different race to you?
It speaks volumes of nothing. Who knows what mental state this person was in at the time of this attack and until he makes the claim that he was doing this "for Islam" you really can't make that assertion because you have no evidence to back it up. But you have because you have an obvious prejudice.
LOL. You moron.
The people in the ME are fighting western imperialism. They are legitimately trying to remove foreign forces from their soil. If we didnt go about fucking people over, there would be no hate.
Where was the late before we starting nibbling Israel's sac? Where was the hate before we starting forcing states into submission, supporting dictators etc?
Our phoney war in Afghanistan has caused destabilization in Pakistan, our gross war crime in Iraq has inflamed the Muslim world against us. Just like we incur the wrath of Latin Americans owing to Western oppression, so to do those people rise up.
You need a class or 2 of US History. I can school your ass if you want.
Its pretty fucking simple. If we stop acting like jerks, we wont incur such hatred. When that B52 drops a bomb, someone's son dies, someone's brother dies. Those people are human, naturally they want revenge.
And another thing, the history of the western nations is more bloody and brutal then any other peoples. WW1/WW2 are really European-American caused crisis, holocausts, slavery, inquisitions.
No, the west is a blood thirsty monster.
I have an obvious "predjudice" because Islam is a vile and crude religion, period. how anyone with a straight face could say anything otherwise is beyond me, as we still get the weekly Islamofascist in the Middle East blowing themselves up for "allah".
LOL. Fool I probably forget more about the ME [or entire world] in one day then you'll ever know. The schisms in the ME were grossly exaccerbated by illegal US actions.
Before we went crazy, where were the bombings in Iraq? Iraq is home to the worlds oldest civilization, they invented wonderful things. We cant pretend we are a positive force. No, the US is a monster-simple as that. Blood thirsty, imperialistic and ignorant of the world. [The govt, not the wonderful people].
The sunni-shia schism isnt new, but its historical violence has been pretty low. Sunnis form about 85% of the world's muslims. If you want to learn something, Professor Timothy Winter of Cambridge University has wonderful talks/books about Islam and ideological schism.
He's a Muslim convert btw, so you know, in your mind he may hate the west. LOL Despite being from the English gentry.
for starters, I would never support an imperialistic American military like the one we have. my brother in law was injured in Kabul because of Boosh and Obama is a traitor as he said we would withdraw from the ME. what we've done has been one of the biggest quagmires in Americas history, and like most Americans the media duped me into believing Saddam had WMDs, in addition to Rumsfeld and co, a whole shitload of democrcats in the House.
Which brings me to another point: yes, thousands have died because we were duped by Rumsfeld and co., but wasn't Saddam just a peach? How many thousands of his own people did he gas?
He is indeed a suicide terrorist. He was definitely aiming to kill a lot more people before he would kill himself, or perhaps knew he was going to be killed anyway.
Where is it reported that he was a terrorist?
Oh I see, to have a terrorist's mentality you must be proven to have ties to a known terrorist group....therefore his act was not really an act of terror, only becasuse we don't know his purpose.
Yes, all this is now is someone who "snapped". Guess all thoses postal workers were terrorist by your standards.
You preach how you can't stand people being prejudice and then you just went out and did it yourself. Hypocrit.
Oh yeah, calling a guy who kills 12 inocent people a terrorist is me being prejudiced. Methinks you are taking it a little personal..ah.:tongue:
I didn't implied he was a terorist because he's Muslim, he was a terrorist because that's what his act showed.
So is the guy in Orlando also a terrorist?
I don't know anything about "the guy in Orlando," you have not posted a link to the story. And anyways, I still stand by my comment that he was a terrorist. He was supposed to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, where he would obviously have to fight and kill others that believe like he does, and was upset about it. So he chose to kill his fellow American soldiers instead. To me that's treason and terrorism.
Please. You are not fooling me with that remark. It was obvious that you implied I was prejudiced because I said he was a terrorist. It was that statement that you took personal. Why? Because he was a Muslim?Your damn right I am taking it personal this was an Army Officer, a person who your tax dollars are PAYING. And a person who is suppose to be a leader of soldiers.