yeah i'm like hr.
up yours dude.
this was the top story all day on yahoo homepage and i posted it because i thought it was interesting.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/09/obama.reid/index.html?section=cnn_latest
http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?p=reid+apologizes&ei=UTF-8&rd=r2
i dont create many threads either
hr posts all kinds of stuff from left wing blog sites, this was an ap story.
this actually happened, reid did apologize to obama for "racial remarks".
far from a right wing nonsensical story.
another apology plus the fact that it shows evidence of at least reid choosing to promote obama because of him being black.
as i believe pretty much did the whole democratic party.
again too bad if you dont like the thread, deal with it.
you dont see me going into every thread i dont like ripping on the op.
you know why? cause i'm not a punk.
Ohhhhhh 'dems is fightin' words. No need to get upset, just pointing out a truth. lol at your reaction, the "HR" thing must have struck a cord because it has a semblance of truth. People that scour the internet (maybe not in this instance but in general) to find ANY negative story about an administration are just laughable (just as HR was/is on the other side). Borderline hypocritical in that when Bush was in office the same criticisms were not offered. Common tactic to avoid this is to say that that is the past; but when he was in office you were un-patriotic if you spoke ill of bush and now that he's not, its in the past and you should let it be. Bush ran the country into the ground for 8 years and now its all Obama's fault? He's only been in office for a shade under a year...Why does the same un-patriotic classification not apply now when Obama is in office against people that speak badly of him or the Dems in general?
As far as the story goes he apologized and that should be the end of it. Much more racism/stereotypes can be found on the right but sadly, this is nothing new.