If you think that Ovechkin should've been suspended as he was then that's your opinion, but when you defend (more like deny) what Downie did and then say that the suspension on Ovechkin is valid, that's just insane. I know you love the Lightning, but what Ovechkin did was not nearly as bad as what Downie did. The only reason he was suspended was because Campbell got injured, which is the point the article is making, and is one I completely agree with. If Ovechkin deserved a suspension for what he did then so did Downie.
How someone can watch that clip and not see the obvious intent to injure is beyond me. However, I do understand that you're blinded by your love of the Lightning.
Yeah, more people than just me too. Lots of people. Most people. Probably close to every person who viewed that play
objectively. I know one person who viewed it my way, and that's Greg Wyshynski, award-winning sports writer who is the creator and editor of Puck Daddy, the most popular hockey blog in the world. He saw it just the way that I did, objectively. I really liked the way he said it too:
"If only Ovechkin had the good sense to place Campbell in a Scorpion Death Lock along the boards like Steve Downie, he might have avoided suspension. But then Sidney Crosby came back and played, right?
Suspensions are only for the injurious, not the ones with intentions to injure."
For the full article again:
http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog...game-suspension-NHL-calls-hit-?urn=nhl,228120
P.S. The way you describe the play here makes it seem like you either didn't see it, or only saw it once or twice and have since created a false memory of how the actual play happened. There was no "check" involved in the play at all. Crosby had just dumped the puck and was gliding into the zone and Downie came up from behind and clearly stuck his knee right between Crosby's legs and then pulls his knee down to the ice, pulling Crosby's leg with it and then pressing down on Crosby's knee, causing it to bend awkwardly. Watch this clip if you're still mistaken:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHeh3tyUL10
Even the announcers are saying that it was a dirty play and an intent to injure. Every title for a video of the play on the internet either says "cheap shot" or "attempt to injure." If you care to respond, please watch the clip in full, it shows the play repeatedly and from every angle available, so there's very little chance of seeing it as something other than what it really was.