The problem with men ...
Ok Prof, i understand where you are coming from, but come on, your comment on my post went a bit overboard seeing as i was making a joke, im not that stupid to think that just because a woman was president there wouldnt be any wars, i respect your opinion, youre an intelligent guy and you always make quality posts, just lighten up a bit on us dopes who like to make bad jokes :laugh:and yes i just called myself a dope, as Mr Spock would say, "To deny the facts would be illogical"
Sorry, it's one thing I won't "lighten up on." I apologize, but I don't feel I should have to for it.
You guys -- especially "liberals" -- talk about equality and women and everything else. But then you just overdo it with the male non-sense. It's funny once, maybe twice. Then you do it again and again and again. And then it doesn't end, and it's supposed to be funny?
Imagine you are a woman. And you hear it not just once, but several times per day, without end. At some point, it's just flat out harrassment -- not just individually, but against women in general. At some point, it's not a "joke" anymore, but a male-pig attitude that seems to dominate.
And men then wonder why women seem to be bothered by it? Duh!
And, again, the sickening part is that some of the worst personal offenders consider themselves "liberal" or "enlightened." It's the main reason why -- even though I consider Clinton a "good" President in general -- he was a male-pig. He paid total lip service to women, minorities, etc... with other "do as I say" while being a total racist, sexist and overall male pig which was basically "don't do as I do."
And what really chaps my ass is how people call W. a "racist" or "sexist." No, he won't champion affirmative action. But at the same time, he doesn't pay lip service while being a male-pig personally. He respects individuals, which is not what one can say about Clinton, personally, when it came to African Americans or women.
There's no more proof in this than the difference in how the Clinton administration treated their White House service employees compared to the Bush administration. The Clintons were pigs, personally, and there are all sorts of stories on their utter lack of respect for people, especially minorities and women. The Bush's brought some respect back to the White House, starting with the service people who worked in it.
The American image might be toast because Bush is a Texan and can't speak publicly well. But at least he's not a male pig like Clinton, which is similar to what I see from so-called "liberals" on this board far too often.
