:glugglug:^
Huh? The Pro Bowl is basically 2-hand touch. The Pro Bowl is a reward not an actual competitive game.
Refer to my earlier quote...
:yesyes:I would like to see them in the Superbowl then we can really end the debate.
:glugglug:^
Huh? The Pro Bowl is basically 2-hand touch. The Pro Bowl is a reward not an actual competitive game.
:yesyes:I would like to see them in the Superbowl then we can really end the debate.
Brady won't play in the Pro Bowl because he'll be prepping for the Super Bowl.
![]()
Apologies to all for veering a little off topic, but just to finish the above post, I suppose my question back to you would be how come the league can ban Stanley Wilson and Earl Ferrell for life for drug use (non-violent acts, and neither player was ever charged with a crime relating to their usage), but allow Vick to go back?
I'm NOT saying they were wrong: what I'm saying is that the league is inconsistent - incoherent even - with it's discipline, far too easily swayed by the politics and money that constantly threaten to completely overshadow the only thing that actually matters: the play.
(Thanks to other posters for bearing with me on this.)
Hernandez and Gronkowski are not shitty players. They're going to be studs. They both had solid college careers at Big Boy Colleges. They're just rooks now.
I'm not sure how to argue against Matt Ryan. He does seem to have everything needed to be in the discussion.
The Pro Bowl will decide whether Tom Vick or Michael Brady is the MVP, The field speaks louder than the stats or the words.I have no doubt the 2 will face each other & we'll see who's the best this year.
Not if either is playing in the Super Bowl the following week. And even if they were, they'd play about a quarter.