Who are you voting/rooting for in this years election
- Thread starter Brino
- Start date
- Status
Brino said:
fatcheck.org is not an official site. get it it is not a dot mil so taht is a lie. some of my links are pro bush the two belonging to bush website yes.
but yours are all pro democrat website
http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2004/072404.asp a lot of advertisment belonging to democrats in the page
http://www.comedycentral.com/games/gameplayer/play.jhtml childish crap
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&e=2&u=/ap/bushism the title of the article says it all
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0805042bush1.html#6
something trying to prove that what bush says is always bad
http://www.internetweekly.org/photo_cartoons/cartoon_cheney_or_not.html misleading crap
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0806-08.htm for you every republican is hateful so by your logic everyone who votes republican is hateful
http://www.emogame.com/bushgame.html your so called realistic game
most of your links are filled with the bush hate/propaganda typical from liberal or must i say democrat.
my link that is here
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200405041626.asp
and another i forgot to post
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5662329/
my links are not filled with hate they just describe what is the point about kerry.
regards
georges
Brino said:
oh really? The tone they use in the article is clearly negative about bush and it makes kerry appearing like a hero.My conclusion the person who made this article and even runs this website is a democrat.
I am not lying but you try to pass your games for reality so you are a liar plus you are blinded by Michael Moore.
georges said:fatcheck.org is not an official site. get it it is not a dot mil so taht is a lie. some of my links are pro bush the two belonging to bush website yes.
but yours are all pro democrat website
http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2004/072404.asp a lot of advertisment belonging to democrats in the page
http://www.comedycentral.com/games/gameplayer/play.jhtml childish crap
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&e=2&u=/ap/bushism the title of the article says it all
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0805042bush1.html#6
something trying to prove that what bush says is always bad
http://www.internetweekly.org/photo_cartoons/cartoon_cheney_or_not.html misleading crap
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0806-08.htm for you every republican is hateful so by your logic everyone who votes republican is hateful
http://www.emogame.com/bushgame.html your so called realistic game
most of your links are filled with the bush hate/propaganda typical from liberal or must i say democrat.
my link that is here
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200405041626.asp
and another i forgot to post
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5662329/
my links are not filled with hate they just describe what is the point about kerry.
WTF do you mean factcheck.org is not an official site!? Do you mean official as in biased sites like GeorgewBush.com and JohnKerry.com!? I thought our links werent supposed to be biased like that!
Here's the link to FactCheck.org
http://www.factcheck.org/
I'm sure if you actual visit the site (which you probably wont) you'll see that it's not biased it criticizes Kerry as well.
Brino 1 georges 0
http://www.whitehouse.org/
http://www.comedycentral.com/
http://www.internetweekly.org/
These websites are joke websites! I have never used these sites to back up my facts!
Brino 2 georges 0
http://story.news.yahoo.com/
Yahoo news is not biased it's just like every other major news website!
Brino 3 georges 0
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/
Again another news website but not biased!
Brino 4 georges 0
http://www.commondreams.org/
Commentary Website! Biased against both Kerry and Bush!
Brino 5 georges 0
http://www.emogame.com/bushgame.html
Finally you come up with a site that's biased but I challenge you to disprove the facts it gives!
Final Score Brino 5 georges 1
BTW If I were to go off of your tactic for judging which sites are biased or not then this site would be biased!
http://www.nationalreview.com/
Because it's ads are pro Bush!
Brino said:So lets get this straight you have no proof that the site is run by democrats only assumptions! So when you say it's run by democrats your lying because you have no proof that it is!
how can you be that sure that your so called websites are that neutral ? if yes that is good ? if no stop babling crap
1) funny or not that is against bush and os it is pro democrat so -1Brino said:
2) some days ago i heard on voa that the ceo of google as well as the ceo of yahoo will vote kerry so -1
3) prouve it to me that is not a biased democrat the tone is clearly not in favor of Bush so-1
4)ok
5)that site is bs
conclusion 2-1
Are we keeping scores now? *LOL*
Can somebody please get an unbiased person to be the judge here? Keeping your own scores are cheating.
How about three teams or something?
The Conservative team - Georges, Ranger etc.
The Liberal team - Brino etc.
The Socialist team - Only poor me. Can I get a handicap, an advantage, or something like in golf?
*LOL*Can somebody please get an unbiased person to be the judge here? Keeping your own scores are cheating.
How about three teams or something?
The Conservative team - Georges, Ranger etc.
The Liberal team - Brino etc.
The Socialist team - Only poor me. Can I get a handicap, an advantage, or something like in golf?
Last edited:
Starman said:Are we keeping scores now?
Can somebody please get an unbiased person to be the judge here? Keeping your own scores are cheating.
How about three teams or something?
The Conservative team - Georges, Ranger etc.
The Liberal team - Brino etc.
The Socialist team - Only poor me. Can I get a handicap, an advantage, or something like in golf?
that is hard question at which i think i cannot answer :dunno:
georges said:how can you be that sure that your so called websites are that neutral ? if yes that is good ? if no stop babling crap
In truth there is no such thing as being neutral. Everybody has an opinion! However if you get a site that criticizes Kerry and Bush then you can be sure that the site is fair and balanced or at least as fair and balanced as can be!
georges said:
I have never used those sites to back up my facts, period!
You gave this site as a link
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/
I'm sure that the CEO of this company is also voting for someone so going off of your flawed logic it would be biased as well.
Ok I'll prove it to you
Here you go!
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/about.html
You still havn't disproved the facts it gives!
Starman said:Are we keeping scores now? *LOL*
Can somebody please get an unbiased person to be the judge here? Keeping your own scores are cheating.
How about three teams or something?
The Conservative team - Georges, Ranger etc.
The Liberal team - Brino etc.
The Socialist team - Only poor me. Can I get a handicap, an advantage, or something like in golf?
And here I thought you were on my side Starman!
Oh well I didnt need ya anyways! Saw GWB and "reporting for duty" yesterday. Didn't catch all of each speech, but enough. Both guys has good speeches and good interaction with the crowd. Gomer Pyle had his wife drone on for 20 minuites prior to introducing the guy that Gomer saved in nam. Then, he introduced Gomer. Thank God, I missed her tirade. She is scary:eek:
Gomer had a huge audience(20K+, i'm guessing) while GWB was in a high school. gomer gave his typical stump speech while GWB did a Q&A.
You should have seen the motorcade for GWB, impressive. didn't get to see Gomers but he was traveling in a bus. I sure it was fairly large as well.
Reporting for Duty,
Ranger:glugglug:
Gomer had a huge audience(20K+, i'm guessing) while GWB was in a high school. gomer gave his typical stump speech while GWB did a Q&A.
You should have seen the motorcade for GWB, impressive. didn't get to see Gomers but he was traveling in a bus. I sure it was fairly large as well.
Reporting for Duty,
Ranger:glugglug:
I thought this was funny coming from a GOP website
"The rule of law, the very foundation for a free society, has been under assault, not only by criminals from the ground up, but also from the top down. An administration that lives by evasion, coverup, stonewalling, and duplicity has given us a totally discredited Department of Justice. The credibility of those who now manage the nation’s top law enforcement agency is tragically eroded."
Here's the site
http://www.rnc.org/About/PartyPlatform/default.aspx?Section=4
(Second to the last paragraph)
"The rule of law, the very foundation for a free society, has been under assault, not only by criminals from the ground up, but also from the top down. An administration that lives by evasion, coverup, stonewalling, and duplicity has given us a totally discredited Department of Justice. The credibility of those who now manage the nation’s top law enforcement agency is tragically eroded."
Here's the site
http://www.rnc.org/About/PartyPlatform/default.aspx?Section=4
(Second to the last paragraph)
Well, so far I haven't had a reason to argue against you. I believe it's probably only when it comes to economics, taxes and such where there is a big difference between Liberals and Socialists.Originally posted by Brino
And here I thought you were on my side Starman!
*LOL*And don't say you don't need me. Are you trying to hurt my feelings?
*sniff sniff**LOL*
No, I'm cool, but don't count me out completely, it might become a bit empty without my help.
Last edited:
Starman said:Well, so far I haven't had a reason to argue against you. I believe it's probably only when it comes to economics, taxes and such where there is a big difference between Liberals and Socialists.
And don't say you don't need me. Are you trying to hurt my feelings?
*LOL*
No, I'm cool, but don't count me out completely, it might become a bit empty without my help.
Yeah your right! It seems like those that are usually on my side like bibo, foxfilm, Inspector_XXX, etc. dont post in this thread all that much anymore. So if your the only one that comes close to sharing my views then I'll take whatever help you wanna give!
- Status
