shes not good enought for u dude, dont you take in personal hope u find some1 who treats u right.
She said that she didn't like being treated well. She said that it was too "perfect", since we never had any arguments and neither of us did anything wrong. And she also told me that she was used to dating bad guys, or more adventerous guys- risk-takers.
We had only been dating for 4 and a half months; it really frustrated me when she told me this, because I just felt like I gave myself to her for the right reasons, and even that wasn't good enough. I've honestly never broken up with someone because of this, usually it was just a lack of attraction...but being too nice? C'mon!
I can understand that she's used to dating bad guys, but it scared me when she said she didn't like being treated well, as if she was used to being treated like dirt by her ex's.
So what do you guys think? Were her reasons valid, and am I just being bitter? Also, talk about your past break-ups and why they ended.
Well I'm nothing like the guy you described, and I wouldn't say I'm far off from being passive, but I'd have a long road ahead of me.
We did go to a number of places: the movies, skating, lunch, etc. Like most relationships, it was all good in the beginning- we were always laughing, holding each other, and I could hold a conversation pretty well with her (the 10 seconds of silence seldom occured). It wasn't until a week and a half or so before we broke up when she started getting moody and acting all bi-polar. One minute we were talking on the phone talking to each other, and everything seemed all right. Then the next day she would act grumpy and upset at me, and I would have absolutely no clue as to why she was in that particular mood. She never had any problems at home, so I would always assume that it was my doing. Even when we texted each other she began to use one-liners, which just frustrated me even more.
Also, this was my 5th relationship, and the previous girls I dated didn't have a pattern as awkward and convaluted as hers.
God forbid someone enjoy a drama-free and stressful life. There's no reason there should be drama in a relationship. At all. If he agreed to her arguments sides like you said, then it probably wasn't that serious to begin with. Why go through all of that drama over something petty? There's no point. Also, there's nothing wrong with sitting around the apartment watching movies. A person's relationship should not be based on "going out" and having "adventures" like society dictates you should.
:rofl: Yes! Passive people DO fall flat!The classic whine, "You never take me anywhere."
Yes, there are nice guys, every guy is not a self-involved punk.
So, the "passive" argument falls flat.
Now I feel really bad for her.
:rofl: Yes! Passive people DO fall flat!
There's a whole continuum of personality between "Nice Guy" and "self involved punk". What I'm saying (but may not have been too clear on) is that there's a difference between a nice guy (a man who is a real man, an great human being worth having) and the "Nice Guy" who *thinks* he's a great guy who is just not getting the chicks because "girls like bad boys" when he's really a passive douche who is full of bitterness, anger and resentment. Girls can smell that guy coming a mile away.
Guh. Okay. Being a girl who has broken up with a "too nice" guy before, I can translate this one from Girleese to real human English. "Too Nice" is like "Nice Guy". Nobody is ever a Nice Guy. He's a passive aggressive dick who sits by and eyes you while he "waits" and watches the girl pick the right guy. She knows he wants her, she also knows he's not going to step up to the plate and she resents his passive aggressive behavior.
She broke up with you because you were passive and boring.
Now, I can only speak for myself and the few friends I know who have left "too nice" people, but it's never because someone's too nice, it's because the person is too passive.
:rofl: Yes! Passive people DO fall flat!
There's a whole continuum of personality between "Nice Guy" and "self involved punk". What I'm saying (but may not have been too clear on) is that there's a difference between a nice guy (a man who is a real man, an great human being worth having) and the "Nice Guy" who *thinks* he's a great guy who is just not getting the chicks because "girls like bad boys" when he's really a passive douche who is full of bitterness, anger and resentment. Girls can smell that guy coming a mile away.
Yet, in a twist of sad irony, they can't smell an obvious abuser, piece of shit, loser or overall douchebag, even if they're right under their nose.
I didn't say that there should be drama, I'm saying that a person should have his own opinions. If I say, "where would you like to go tonight?" and he responds with, "I don't know, where do you want to go?" that's boring and passive. If he says, "I think we should pull out of Iraq right now" and I respond with, "Really? I think that we need to maintain a presence there until they can stand on their own." and he says, "Oh yeah, or that too." that's just not interesting. He needs to have his own thoughts, not just acquiesce to mine because he thinks that's polite.
...the "Nice Guy" who *thinks* he's a great guy who is just not getting the chicks because "girls like bad boys" when he's really a passive douche who is full of bitterness, anger and resentment. Girls can smell that guy coming a mile away.