member2686
Banned
The difference between eating animal flesh that has been specifically bred for human consumption and supporting blood "sport" is tremendous, IMO. I don't see hypocrisy there. Animals bred for our consumption are not killed by thrill-seeking "hunters."
As far as my "puerile" statement, I believe you meant to say "ironic." Puerile comes from the Latin word "puer," which means "boy," and "puerile" has taken the connotation of "childish" in modern English.
I did not develop the land here and steal the deers' habitat. I was born into this area. I wish we had MORE deer here - they're beautiful to watch, but thrill-killers take out SOME each year, claiming they're protecting the species from "overpopulation." Nature itself takes care of that. We don't NEED guys running around in the woods with grins on their faces after they've blown the side of a deer open saying, "Nice buck! Can't wait to get that rack above my fireplace!" It's thrill-seeking, not "harvesting," IMO. If venison was a food in-demand, you can be sure that deer would be bred in captivity just like cattle, and then harvested for our consumption.
Take squirrels, for example. A guy goes into the woods with a gun and tries to shoot a squirrel. They're elusive little animals. What he's doing is NOT trying to save their habitat or control their population because they're some sort of a societal nuisance. He's out for a thrill-kill of a moving, living target. In his "sport," an animal will have needlessly died. You can spend all day hunting squirrels and maybe shoot a couple, if you're a good shot. That's NOT going to feed your family and "protect their habitat."
How is hunting deer protecting their habitat? You're killing the deer, not keeping their habitat clean, pollution-free, etc. so they can live in it and flourish.
What does deer walking on my lawn in April have anything to do with hunting season in autumn? They were here last year as well - summer, fall, and winter. The "hunters" around here apparently aren't very good shots in their thrill-kills, a.k.a. "sport." That's a good thing.
If a person kills an animal for sport, they'd damn well better use every single part of that animal, for food and clothing, etc. I still disagree that it's a sport. If you want to prove your prowess with a gun, go to the target range - don't kill an animal.
Anyway, we all have our opinions on this and it's been debated to death in this and the "Cheney Shot a Man" thread.
People know where I stand, and I know where some of you other folks stand on this issue. We're going to have to politely agree to disagree.
:hatsoff: :2 cents:
As far as my "puerile" statement, I believe you meant to say "ironic." Puerile comes from the Latin word "puer," which means "boy," and "puerile" has taken the connotation of "childish" in modern English.
I did not develop the land here and steal the deers' habitat. I was born into this area. I wish we had MORE deer here - they're beautiful to watch, but thrill-killers take out SOME each year, claiming they're protecting the species from "overpopulation." Nature itself takes care of that. We don't NEED guys running around in the woods with grins on their faces after they've blown the side of a deer open saying, "Nice buck! Can't wait to get that rack above my fireplace!" It's thrill-seeking, not "harvesting," IMO. If venison was a food in-demand, you can be sure that deer would be bred in captivity just like cattle, and then harvested for our consumption.
Take squirrels, for example. A guy goes into the woods with a gun and tries to shoot a squirrel. They're elusive little animals. What he's doing is NOT trying to save their habitat or control their population because they're some sort of a societal nuisance. He's out for a thrill-kill of a moving, living target. In his "sport," an animal will have needlessly died. You can spend all day hunting squirrels and maybe shoot a couple, if you're a good shot. That's NOT going to feed your family and "protect their habitat."
How is hunting deer protecting their habitat? You're killing the deer, not keeping their habitat clean, pollution-free, etc. so they can live in it and flourish.
What does deer walking on my lawn in April have anything to do with hunting season in autumn? They were here last year as well - summer, fall, and winter. The "hunters" around here apparently aren't very good shots in their thrill-kills, a.k.a. "sport." That's a good thing.
If a person kills an animal for sport, they'd damn well better use every single part of that animal, for food and clothing, etc. I still disagree that it's a sport. If you want to prove your prowess with a gun, go to the target range - don't kill an animal.
Anyway, we all have our opinions on this and it's been debated to death in this and the "Cheney Shot a Man" thread.
People know where I stand, and I know where some of you other folks stand on this issue. We're going to have to politely agree to disagree.
:hatsoff: :2 cents:
Mayhem said:HYPOCRISY ALERT!!! My friend, if you have so much as pulled into the drive-thru at McDonalds, then your argument is absurd. Where is the distinction between me hunting a deer and you ordering a bucket from KFC? To me there is none. You, in effect, hired a "hitman" to have dinner. I, on the other hand, paid to protect your deers' habitat with the money I paid for licenses and deer tags and put in the effort (and respect) to stalk my deer and take him. I too have a background in target shooting, BTW. In fact, I was the 1994 Texas State IPSC Revolver Champ (only because Jerry Miculek didn't show up, but there it is), and have a few rifle trophies too. If you don't know the difference between deer walking on your lawn in April, and trying to hunt one in the fall, perhaps you should try learning.
You watch deer from your patio, then say it's someone else who is encroaching on their turf. If someone else made a statement as puerile as that, you'd be the first one to jump up and down on their head.
Last edited: