In the trenches they were lions led by donkey's.
The officers there should have been the ones shot for incompetence, not the ones shooting men and boys for so-called desertion and the likes. Some of the actions commited by officers were a crime in it's self and a needless waste of life.
The most famous football match of all time happened in WWI. During Xmas in the trenches when all sides came out and had a game together before heading back to their dug outs. And the officers of both sides started charging the soldiers with offences afterwards. That's bullshit.
R.I.P Henry and Harry.
This is a gross distortion of the truth.Officers had a disproportionate number of casualties, a lot more generals were killed than in WW2.I once knew a veteran who served the whole 4 years-he was an educated man but refused a commission several times because he knew the life expectancy of officers.He remained a sergeant until 1918 (when in fact he took a commission)
The problem was that technology favoured defence and you don't win a war by being defensive.Haig was in fact very keen on new technology ; the tank was just one thing he fully supported.Look at the link below;I quote a paragraph from it
>>"Haig, however, was no technophobe. He encouraged the development of advanced weaponry such as tanks, machine guns and aircraft. He, like Rawlinson and a host of other commanders at all levels in the BEF, learned from experience. The result was that by 1918 the British army was second to none in its modernity and military ability. It was led by men who, if not military geniuses, were at least thoroughly competent commanders. The victory in 1918 was the payoff. The 'lions led by donkeys' tag should be dismissed for what it is - a misleading caricature.<<
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwone/lions_donkeys_01.shtml