Favourite SBTNW Thread?

Favourite SBTNW Thread?

  • favorite Tim Burton movie?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • favorite Stanley Kubrick movie?

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • favorite Steven Spielberg movie?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • favorite neo-punk band?

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • favorite Martin Scorsese movie?

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • favorite Dan Brown book?

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Other Thread? There's hundreds to choose from.

    Votes: 18 72.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Status
Not open for further replies.

youwanttoshagme

Closed Account
I'm thinking of starting an alternative to Freeones. It'll be called freebones.com (Free-B-ones) with identical content to Freeones, everyone will have the same accounts, post comments etc, but SBTNW will be ****** and never be able to add another inane comment or post ever again.
 

SBTNW

Banned
I'm thinking of starting an alternative to Freeones. It'll be called freebones.com (Free-B-ones) with identical content to Freeones, everyone will have the same accounts, post comments etc, but SBTNW will be ****** and never be able to add another inane comment or post ever again.

another enemy?

well youwanttoshagme, please get in line behind senob44, DOA82, and many others...

just by curiosity, how do you think you're gonna keep me out? i mean, i could make an account with another name, you know...
 

lone gunman

Closed Account
I'm thinking of starting an alternative to Freeones. It'll be called freebones.com (Free-B-ones) with identical content to Freeones, everyone will have the same accounts, post comments etc, but SBTNW will be ****** and never be able to add another inane comment or post ever again.
Are you gonna give yourself 16 times more posts or rep power there?
That way you could match SBTNW!
 
Well,I really like any SBTNW thread better than the enormous "Would you guys have sex with a shemale?" gay piece-of-**** thread.


I concur.

At least SBTNW's poll's are valid, reasonable and sensible...
unlike some of the nonsense that gets posted (yup, even I'm guilty of that)

What's the real argument here, quantity?, quality?..
or are there some personal 'issues' being aired here?

:2 cents:
 
What's the real argument here, quantity?, quality?..
or are there some personal 'issues' being aired here?

As the thread starter, (which I now regret) I would just like to say that there is no argument from me or anything personal aimed towards SBTNW.

It was simply meant as an ironic joke that seems to have gone right over most people's heads.
 
You forgot the choice: Other, it has happened yet.
 
As the thread starter, (which I now regret) I would just like to say that there is no argument from me or anything personal aimed towards SBTNW.

It was simply meant as an ironic joke that seems to have gone right over most people's heads.



Maybe so, but such offhand posts can often be taken the wrong way.
If it doubt.. don't post. :hatsoff:
 

youwanttoshagme

Closed Account
Are you gonna give yourself 16 times more posts or rep power there?
That way you could match SBTNW!

I could multi quote a few threads from above, but as I'm still doing some work on the side, I can't be bothered at the mo. Don't feel like I'm just singling out lone gunman etc etc, nothing personal but I cant be bothered to quote the earlier SBTNW post

My point was more to the fact that on this forum, there are often a lot of threads that appear that I find quiet interesting, and the follow on has lead me to quiet a few sites that I otherwise wouldn't have known about, ie a few of the photographic threads, news items, current affairs, stats etc. From an number of other sites that I use, various topics are discussed, and one of them quiet nicely sums up it's policy as "treat this as the forum owners front room." So if you in their house, how would you conduct yourself?


That gets me onto forum etiquette. Rep and post counts don't measure what some one has to say. If you look at my previous posts and you'll see that the majority of my posts are more than just a few words and offer a description, or an explanation or an argument rather than a "she's hot" or "I'd fuck her." I could easily spam half the site, knock up a load of threads with "yeah" and "too right" and get my post count up as much as I like but I don't. Why should I? Back to the "treat it like your friends front room," you'd prefer to be though of as the person with some intelligence rather than the jerk who just shouts out short phrases wouldn't you? Right??

My aperant beef with SBTNW then, isn't that I don't like him etc etc as I don't know who he is, but imagine that going to your friends front room idea again. Imagine walking in through that door and seeing that person again who last time you thought just contributed empty noise. Thats how I feel when I see SBTNW either on the thread starter section or a whole line of last posts from each thread tagged SBTNW. I would much prefer to read a couple of threads that have some information in them and an explain view point (Prof Vol is good at it, as are quiet a lot of the people who have posted in political threads, threads on guns, war, crime, current affairs, or explain not why they thought a film was good but explained what made it good for them).

To see someone just posting one line etc or another thread that I view as just benign or trivial or something a 14 year old comes up with is just annoying and pushes other interesting threads further down.

I'm not intending to flame here, as I know there are quiet a few others that are just as guilty, but post count doesn't equal quality or anything worth saying.


:2 cents:
 

SBTNW

Banned
I could multi quote a few threads from above, but as I'm still doing some work on the side, I can't be bothered at the mo. Don't feel like I'm just singling out lone gunman etc etc, nothing personal but I cant be bothered to quote the earlier SBTNW post

My point was more to the fact that on this forum, there are often a lot of threads that appear that I find quiet interesting, and the follow on has lead me to quiet a few sites that I otherwise wouldn't have known about, ie a few of the photographic threads, news items, current affairs, stats etc. From an number of other sites that I use, various topics are discussed, and one of them quiet nicely sums up it's policy as "treat this as the forum owners front room." So if you in their house, how would you conduct yourself?

That gets me onto forum etiquette. Rep and post counts don't measure what some one has to say. If you look at my previous posts and you'll see that the majority of my posts are more than just a few words and offer a description, or an explanation or an argument rather than a "she's hot" or "I'd fuck her." I could easily spam half the site, knock up a load of threads with "yeah" and "too right" and get my post count up as much as I like but I don't. Why should I? Back to the "treat it like your friends front room," you'd prefer to be though of as the person with some intelligence rather than the jerk who just shouts out short phrases wouldn't you? Right??

My aperant beef with SBTNW then, isn't that I don't like him etc etc as I don't know who he is, but imagine that going to your friends front room idea again. Imagine walking in through that door and seeing that person again who last time you thought just contributed empty noise. Thats how I feel when I see SBTNW either on the thread starter section or a whole line of last posts from each thread tagged SBTNW. I would much prefer to read a couple of threads that have some information in them and an explain view point (Prof Vol is good at it, as are quiet a lot of the people who have posted in political threads, threads on guns, war, crime, current affairs, or explain not why they thought a film was good but explained what made it good for them).

To see someone just posting one line etc or another thread that I view as just benign or trivial or something a 14 year old comes up with is just annoying and pushes other interesting threads further down.

I'm not intending to flame here, as I know there are quiet a few others that are just as guilty, but post count doesn't equal quality or anything worth saying.

so.... do you **** me or not? :dunno:
 

Facetious

Moderated
^ ^Rep :bowdown: (highlight reply)


























:jester: Oh, OK ! More than just a few words.

That gets me onto forum etiquette. Rep and post counts don't measure what some one has to say. If you look at my previous posts and you'll see that the majority of my posts are more than just a few words and offer a description, or an explanation or an argument rather than a "she's hot" or "I'd fuck her."

Bravo ! This should be a sticky. It sets a good example for all of us . . on any message board.
[/QI could easily spam half the site, knock up a load of threads with "yeah" and "too right" and get my post count up as much as I like but I don't.Why should I?
I'm guessing that, like the majority of us, you have obligations / duties, relationships and such things in your life to attend to. If only every poster had the same, we'd have a much more inquisitive message board, but hey, we live in a diverse world.
I always try to remind myself that indeed everybody, if they so desire, will take some time out of their day or night to read that of which I type, to which I would be grateful for them doing so, be they in agreement or not.
It is when I post when too tired or forget that other members have to put up with my nonsense is when I'm more likely to post that of which I later regret. We'll try to set a better example.
"P V" is good at it
- Yea he is the polar opposite of this discussion, good for him ! ;)
All in all, A fine writ Shag !
 

lone gunman

Closed Account
I could multi quote a few threads from above, but as I'm still doing some work on the side, I can't be bothered at the mo. Don't feel like I'm just singling out lone gunman etc etc, nothing personal but I cant be bothered to quote the earlier SBTNW post

My point was more to the fact that on this forum, there are often a lot of threads that appear that I find quiet interesting, and the follow on has lead me to quiet a few sites that I otherwise wouldn't have known about, ie a few of the photographic threads, news items, current affairs, stats etc. From an number of other sites that I use, various topics are discussed, and one of them quiet nicely sums up it's policy as "treat this as the forum owners front room." So if you in their house, how would you conduct yourself?


That gets me onto forum etiquette. Rep and post counts don't measure what some one has to say. If you look at my previous posts and you'll see that the majority of my posts are more than just a few words and offer a description, or an explanation or an argument rather than a "she's hot" or "I'd fuck her." I could easily spam half the site, knock up a load of threads with "yeah" and "too right" and get my post count up as much as I like but I don't. Why should I? Back to the "treat it like your friends front room," you'd prefer to be though of as the person with some intelligence rather than the jerk who just shouts out short phrases wouldn't you? Right??

My aperant beef with SBTNW then, isn't that I don't like him etc etc as I don't know who he is, but imagine that going to your friends front room idea again. Imagine walking in through that door and seeing that person again who last time you thought just contributed empty noise. Thats how I feel when I see SBTNW either on the thread starter section or a whole line of last posts from each thread tagged SBTNW. I would much prefer to read a couple of threads that have some information in them and an explain view point (Prof Vol is good at it, as are quiet a lot of the people who have posted in political threads, threads on guns, war, crime, current affairs, or explain not why they thought a film was good but explained what made it good for them).

To see someone just posting one line etc or another thread that I view as just benign or trivial or something a 14 year old comes up with is just annoying and pushes other interesting threads further down.

I'm not intending to flame here, as I know there are quiet a few others that are just as guilty, but post count doesn't equal quality or anything worth saying.


:2 cents:
Now,I honestly,really do not mean any disrespect to you but I couldn`t understand much of what you said!
It is not very well put together.
Also,there are a few spelling mistakes(for example,you meant to write "quite" but wrote "quiet" a couple of times).
Damn,if I were writing such big posts,I would pay attention to such things,so people could understand what I am saying.

As for SBTNW,I haven`t really done my homework on that,so forgive me if what I am going to say is wrong:
I haven`t ever considered him a spammer that just posts stupid comments(I notice such people and,you are right,there are quite a few of them(not to name any)).
I have seen him post good links many times and have not particularly noticed him spamming anytime(again,I am sorry if I am wrong,that is my current impression of him,that he does some solid work,amongst other things).

In the Talk section,I know he opens many threads that are far from being the worse.
I do not spend so much time here as you talkies to be able to judge if his threads are "pointless","stupid" or that there are too many of them,nor do I feel I should do that.
The proliferation of his threads and the pointlessness of his threads(your words guys,not mine) was brought to my attention via public opinion here.
In my opinion,that is not at all the case(again,I do not feel fit to judge or evaluate this since I am not a frequent talkie,this is not my territory).


The reason I said what I said about you,youwanttoshasgme,is that I feel that you are just jumping on the "Everyone Against SBTNW" bandwagon.

I am generally against such things.
(Far from me defending SBTNW or what he does(not my bussiness) or me feeling like some kind of protector)




No insult,to you or to anyone else intended guys and girls,you are my Freeones ******!
 

lone gunman

Closed Account
I could multi quote a few threads from above, but as I'm still doing some work on the side, I can't be bothered at the mo. Don't feel like I'm just singling out lone gunman etc etc, nothing personal but I cant be bothered to quote the earlier SBTNW post

My point was more to the fact that on this forum, there are often a lot of threads that appear that I find quiet interesting, and the follow on has lead me to quiet a few sites that I otherwise wouldn't have known about, ie a few of the photographic threads, news items, current affairs, stats etc. From an number of other sites that I use, various topics are discussed, and one of them quiet nicely sums up it's policy as "treat this as the forum owners front room." So if you in their house, how would you conduct yourself?


That gets me onto forum etiquette. Rep and post counts don't measure what some one has to say. If you look at my previous posts and you'll see that the majority of my posts are more than just a few words and offer a description, or an explanation or an argument rather than a "she's hot" or "I'd fuck her." I could easily spam half the site, knock up a load of threads with "yeah" and "too right" and get my post count up as much as I like but I don't. Why should I? Back to the "treat it like your friends front room," you'd prefer to be though of as the person with some intelligence rather than the jerk who just shouts out short phrases wouldn't you? Right??

My aperant beef with SBTNW then, isn't that I don't like him etc etc as I don't know who he is, but imagine that going to your friends front room idea again. Imagine walking in through that door and seeing that person again who last time you thought just contributed empty noise. Thats how I feel when I see SBTNW either on the thread starter section or a whole line of last posts from each thread tagged SBTNW. I would much prefer to read a couple of threads that have some information in them and an explain view point (Prof Vol is good at it, as are quiet a lot of the people who have posted in political threads, threads on guns, war, crime, current affairs, or explain not why they thought a film was good but explained what made it good for them).

To see someone just posting one line etc or another thread that I view as just benign or trivial or something a 14 year old comes up with is just annoying and pushes other interesting threads further down.

I'm not intending to flame here, as I know there are quiet a few others that are just as guilty, but post count doesn't equal quality or anything worth saying.


:2 cents:
I have been checking out SBTNW`s posts in the Find Your Favorite Babe section and I conclude:
He posts good links and generally does fine work there.He is a good contributor.
So what the hell were you talking about YouWantToShagMe?
Do your homework and do not demean someone without any basis,please.
 
S

sputnikgirl

Guest
^Then he can stay in the favorite babe section & quit junking up talk with inane bullshit polls and two-word answers. Kudos to youwanttoshagme for his post. There is such a thing as forum etiquette. I've spoken to a few people in pms about this topic - if the mods don't care, then I guess those of us who actually want to debate intelligently, instead of bullshitting around, will join another board.
 

SBTNW

Banned
Then he can stay in the favorite babe section & quit junking up talk with inane bullshit polls and two-word answers.

whaddayaknow... another enemy

get in line!
you're right behind Senob44, Becks...poamr, DOA82 and Peter Gazinya (thanks for the rep, buddy!) and many others who remains hidden, of course

and my revenge will be stop wanking about you, SputnikGirl!
 
whaddayaknow... another enemy

get in line!
you're right behind Senob44, DAO82 and Peter Gazinya (thanks for the rep, buddy!) and many others who remains hidden, of course

and my revenge will be stop wanking about you, SputnikGirl!

You read it wrong SBTNW, Sputnikgirl is talking about youwanttoshagme. :)
 

SBTNW

Banned
You read it wrong SBTNW, Sputnikgirl is talking about youwanttoshagme. :)

lone gunman says: "I have been checking out SBTNW`s posts in the Find Your Favorite Babe section"
and she says: "Then he can stay in the favorite babe section"
and also says: "with inane bullshit polls" (am i the one who starts polls, right?)

so...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top