Speaking of immortality:
Immortality in an "afterlife" is wasted immortality.
Do I seek "immortality"? Ofcourse I do!
I want people to remember me long after I'm dead. I want them to hear my name and say "Now he! He was a good man!"
Think Gandhi. Florence Nightengale. Martin Luther King Jr. That is the kind of "immortality" we should all strive for
Yes! Our essence lives on in the minds of loved ones and if we can achieve positive world fame, then we are truely "immortal"! Well said, Roughneck!
Religion requires faith - not evidence.
I can present all the evidence in the world but all it requires is refute in the following form: "That's not evidence. That's a concotion created by satan to fool the guillible into commiting sin and trangressing against god."
This is a perfect definition of Faith! Honestly, besides the fact that the Christianity has been a trend for the past 2000 years of extermination and mass murder, the definition of faith bothers me most.
No one, at any time, should ever believe in anything without sufficient evidence!!!!!!!!! I really can't say that enough! Let me say it one for time: No one, at any time, should ever believe in anything without sufficient evidence.
There is absolutely NO evidence that God exists, though I would love to proved wrong by someone using a source other than the Bible as justify their means.
I'm of the humble opinion that a god who will willfully overlook my life, and judge me based not on the conduct of my life as a good human being but based simply on the fact that I chose to belive him or not - is not a god, but an conceited, egotistical hedonist.
Pardon me if I am wrong, but I don't think teh Christian God does "overlook," nor "judge" those who don't 'belong' to him. In this case, he wouldn't do either for you because you are not a Christian, or am I mistaken?
On the aforementioned conduct as a good human, the fact is that we can establish morality without a religious reference point. Look at Confucious, he is by far the most influental man, by raw numbers alone, who has ever lived. Confucianism proved that religion isn't necessary to promote moral self-cultivation on a large scale.
And besides, look at the morals Christianity teaches. Do any Christians follow them anyways? Well, some do, but they are the minority. Most Christians look fo rloopholes. They thinkg, "Well, what can I get away with," and such. Good moral systems make peole think, "How should I be?"
And as I mentioned on a previous post, the Bible and God are immoral. God endorses the erradication of 'infidels' and homosexuals, etc....
I can't remember the author of the following quote, nor is it correct word for word:
"If one were to follow the teaching of the Old Testament, he would be a criminal. If one were to follow the New, he would be insane."
A Christian could argue that since I have only read the Bible once in its' entirety, that I interpreted certain passages incorrectly. They just can seem to get through their tiny minds that by interpreting the passages they find undesirable, they are ignoring the true meaning. Take this passage from Deuteronomy 13:6-10 for instance:
"If your brother, your mother's son, or your son or daughter, or the wife you cherish, or your friend who is as your own soul, entice you secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods' (whom neither you nor your fathers have known, of the gods of the peoples who are around you, near you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end),
you shall not yield to him or listen to him; and your eye shall not pity him, nor shall you spare or conceal him.
But you shall surely kill him; your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people."
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy 13:6-9;&version=49;
Hypocritically, Christians add their own 'moral' and 'mystical' meanings to these passages. They seem to be completely blocked from ever reading the following passage:
In Deuteronomy 1:13-" God says, "Whatever I am now commanding you, you must keep and observe, adding nothing to it, taking nothing away."
What more can I say?
By Fox
We don't need to even get started on the treatment of women and the religious implications for women, not only in Islam, where it is most pronounced today, but also in Christianity and Judaism.
True don't need to, but why not! :1orglaugh
Also, thank you for supporting my arguement. You made very good points. I can support all them in return, but that will have to wait 'cause its late! :angels: