Do You believe in God?

  • Yes

    Votes: 195 48.9%
  • No

    Votes: 204 51.1%

  • Total voters
    399
But the reason, I think, people at the time weren't moved to celebrate Jesus as the son of "god" is simple, in my mind: he wasn't. He was just a really great guy. Who had a wife. Who probably had children. That's the most logical explanation.

My point exactly......
 
Sorry for taking so long to reply....
What i mean is that i can't understand how is it possible that the only people who have heard the preachings of jesus don't believe in him.....
If god had sent his representative to preach in a nation (furthermore the chosen nation of God as they claim to be.....) how is it possible that they don't worship him? I don't think that Jews are stupid to defy the son of God, he obviously didn't convince them that he actually is the son of God, the Messiah... And how can i be convinced that he is the son of God when the only people who saw and heard him weren't convinced? It's as simple as that.
All that i have been told are stories that have been written many years after his death, and altered during the centuries by fanatic monks to fit they beliefs and their power over the people.
I won't believe in a God that in the Old Testament says (during a war between the Jews and the Hettaits) to king David kill every living soul in the town, every man woman and child, even the dogs that live in it....
Is this the God i am supposed to believe in? Thanks but no thanks......


Back then prophets were a dime a dozen, every second person was preaching for something, why would random people from the streets suddenly believe in Jesus? his preachings were ordinary at the time.
Jews cant find it possible to worship Jesus since their religion says you are not allowed to worship people or statues or any other God but God.

You answered your own question, do you really think God told King David to kill every woman and child in the city or was the story completely warped and changed? None of these stories are reliable since they were written years after they happened and, usually, whoever wrote them was from some camp (i.e. he was against King David).


So as Legzman cleverly pointed out: there is no way of arguing for such things. Best we not try to convince the religious folk that our logic is right, best they not try to convince us that theirs is. I suppose.



If every second post someone says that there is no point arguing about it then we might as well lock this thread and every other argumentative thread on this board. No one in the history of the world ever walked off a discussion and said "boy, that guy was right, i am so convinced, i will change my perspective". Discussions are for fun and for the sake of the argument and sharing your beliefs.
 
Your right Winter, BUT...for every arguement on this board against religion, or I should say an arguement for your own stand point, there will be an equal arguement against whatever it is that anyone says. Those people who beleive in their religion will have an answer or rational to whatever anyone questions about that religion.
For example if I were to ask well if God exsist why is there so much evil in this world? The religious people would simply say it's all part of a bigger plan. Or it's a test, etc...same for anything else one might ask!
Point is we will all find out when we die one way or the other if what we believe in is true or not!


Ah...now I understand what you meant. This is true.
 
So as Legzman cleverly pointed out: there is no way of arguing for such things. Best we not try to convince the religious folk that our logic is right, best they not try to convince us that theirs is. I suppose.

Fox

Fox, I agree 100% that people should not press their beliefs on others.

This is where a problem arises. Not only is it written, for example, that all Christians must Evangelise other non-believers and atheist, but there are psychological reasons why people of faith want to convince others that their God is the one true God.

Because once one truely believe in something, especially in something as mind consuming as organised religion, then that belief effects how one thinks, feels, acts, and reacts. It changes virtually everything about your life; your desires and fears, even. Once one becomes convinced, using Christianity as an example, that others of another faith are wrong and that accepting God is the only way to be saved and go to heaven, then wouldn't you do anything in your power to save them? I know I would, especially to those I love dearest.

This doesn't apply solely to people of faith; it applies to virtually everyone: liberals, racists, scientists, etc....
 

Perilypos

Retired Moderator
The only proof Christians can use to defend their religion is the Bible. Unfortunately, the Bible itself only provides circular logic. E.g., "The Bible is true because it is God's word," and "God exists because it says so in the Bible"
As I said in my other post, anyone can disprove God using logic, morals, and/or science.

My accepting God was caused by using Aristotelian metaphysics and logic - the sorts of philosophy that try to disprove God seemed to be full of logical contradictions to me. Only after accepting philosophical evidence of God's existence I chose the religion - as Bible doesn't bring a piece of that evidence, it participated in my choosing Catholicism, but not in my being convinced of existence of God.

But the reason, I think, people at the time weren't moved to celebrate Jesus as the son of "god" is simple, in my mind: he wasn't. He was just a really great guy. Who had a wife. Who probably had children. That's the most logical explanation.

Of course, as a Catholic I believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God. But I may be wrong and you and other people, who don't believe may be right: I don't only understand, how Jesus Christ can be acceptable for atheists - if he was not the Son of God, he was a megalomaniac and a demagogue (probably preaching better things than fx Hitler or Mao, but strongly requiring the obedience: I cannot stand a mere man laying claim to such an obedience) - I could even say that before being convinced of the existence of God and of Christianity by PHILOSOPHY and by my own reason, Jesus Christ seemed to be a rather disgusting person to me, because in the texts he doesn't speak or act as a good guy who only comes to help others, but as someone who HAS THE DIVINE POWER. You may raise the objection that these texts were written by people who believed in his Divine Power, but you have probably the same (plus some others maybe) which make you consider him as a great man.

Just my humble opinion. Nobody needs to feel offended, I think.
 

Perilypos

Retired Moderator
Well, the texts which depict the way he was and the things he said and the way he acted were all written many centuries after his death (...),
Fox

Not many centuries, my friend, some of them were made public relatively soon - Gospel according to St. Matthew probably some 20-30 years after Christ's death. Of course, this fact itself doesn't make it reliable.

... but in practice, being preached to and sold religion around every corner does become very, very repetitive, and I also think it is a sort of insult to my intelligence at times.
Fox

Here I fully agree with you, I cannot stand these sorts of brain-washers either. On the other hand, I don't think I need to hide my religion and my ponits of view following from it - this is why I enter the discussions about religion from time to time, although I tend to keep my opinions to myself.
 
My accepting God was caused by using Aristotelian metaphysics and logic - the sorts of philosophy that try to disprove God seemed to be full of logical contradictions to me. Only after accepting philosophical evidence of God's existence I chose the religion - as Bible doesn't bring a piece of that evidence, it participated in my choosing Catholicism, but not in my being convinced of existence of God.

Interesting, this is the first time I've heard anyone say they found God using metaphysics! It's shame I don't know much about Aristotle's logic and methods, but I will look it up soon. Can you reccomend me a source as to where I can get the best information on the subject?

All the religious folks I know were either raised to accept their God or accepted God later in life due to hardships such as drug addiction, terminal disease, etc....
I see all these people as weak. The people raised to accept their God as beings unable to think for themselves and I see the "born-agains" as people with the inability to handle lifes obstacles. That' only MO, derrived from observations of religious folks.

I believe the main reason Omnipotent Gods exist in the first place was man's incessant fear of the unknown. Fear being man's, (and all to those belonging to the animal kingdom) most powerful and primitive instinct, is a commanding instrinct to drive one to invent a higher being that not only gives meaning to ones life, but also eases fear of the unknown; primarily the fear of death.

Do you see any contradictions to this logic?

I respect Christianity in the parts of it which promote equality, peacefulness, valuing everyone equally... but in practice, being preached to and sold religion around every corner does become very, very repetitive, and I also think it is a sort of insult to my intelligence at times.

Fox

Again, I agree with you, 100%! I absolutley love the some of values modern Christianity teaches like the ones you mentioned, and I'd like to add: fidelity in marriage, and the renunciation of worldly goods.
 
Only after accepting philosophical evidence of God's existence I chose the religion - as Bible doesn't bring a piece of that evidence, it participated in my choosing Catholicism, but not in my being convinced of existence of God.
Religion requires faith - not evidence. :)

I can present all the evidence in the world but all it requires is refute in the following form: "That's not evidence. That's a concotion created by satan to fool the guillible into commiting sin and trangressing against god."

Or something of similar accord.


A belief in god requires faith - and faith by definition means "belief despite lack of, or presence of contrary, evidence".

I lived my life hearing arguments from common preachers promising me a fiery torment in hell to army chaplins sneering that "there are no atheists in foxholes".

I'm of the humble opinion that a god who will willfully overlook my life, and judge me based not on the conduct of my life as a good human being but based simply on the fact that I chose to belive him or not - is not a god, but an conceited, egotistical hedonist.

And not someone I would worship for as long as there is breath left in my body and blood coursing in my veins :)


cheers,
 
Speaking of immortality:


Immortality in an "afterlife" is wasted immortality.
Do I seek "immortality"? Ofcourse I do!

I want people to remember me long after I'm dead. I want them to hear my name and say "Now he! He was a good man!"

Think Gandhi. Florence Nightengale. Martin Luther King Jr. That is the kind of "immortality" we should all strive for :)
 
I couldn't agree more!

I so often find myself debating with those trying to convert me: but I live a good life, I look out for people, I try to help, I have nothing but good intentions and I don't like... etc...

You know what they say: "none of that matters if you don't accept the lord jesus christ as your saviour." I'm sure the other major religions have a similar "yes but that's not enough" type idea.

Any religion where all of that good stuff wouldn't matter without accepting the name of the lord, just like you said, is not a religion I would ever subscribe to even if I was so inclined!

Fox
What??!!! You and I agree! :eek:



;)





:hatsoff:


cheers,
 
sorry if i offend anyone, but i do think that god does exist. but, hes not as good as some think. he likes to play with us. if we pass his test, then hes cool with those who did. if not, then ....... just my opinion. not looking to start something here.
 
Speaking of immortality:


Immortality in an "afterlife" is wasted immortality.
Do I seek "immortality"? Ofcourse I do!

I want people to remember me long after I'm dead. I want them to hear my name and say "Now he! He was a good man!"

Think Gandhi. Florence Nightengale. Martin Luther King Jr. That is the kind of "immortality" we should all strive for :)

Yes! Our essence lives on in the minds of loved ones and if we can achieve positive world fame, then we are truely "immortal"! Well said, Roughneck!
Religion requires faith - not evidence.

I can present all the evidence in the world but all it requires is refute in the following form: "That's not evidence. That's a concotion created by satan to fool the guillible into commiting sin and trangressing against god."

This is a perfect definition of Faith! Honestly, besides the fact that the Christianity has been a trend for the past 2000 years of extermination and mass murder, the definition of faith bothers me most.

No one, at any time, should ever believe in anything without sufficient evidence!!!!!!!!! I really can't say that enough! Let me say it one for time: No one, at any time, should ever believe in anything without sufficient evidence.

There is absolutely NO evidence that God exists, though I would love to proved wrong by someone using a source other than the Bible as justify their means.

I'm of the humble opinion that a god who will willfully overlook my life, and judge me based not on the conduct of my life as a good human being but based simply on the fact that I chose to belive him or not - is not a god, but an conceited, egotistical hedonist.

Pardon me if I am wrong, but I don't think teh Christian God does "overlook," nor "judge" those who don't 'belong' to him. In this case, he wouldn't do either for you because you are not a Christian, or am I mistaken?

On the aforementioned conduct as a good human, the fact is that we can establish morality without a religious reference point. Look at Confucious, he is by far the most influental man, by raw numbers alone, who has ever lived. Confucianism proved that religion isn't necessary to promote moral self-cultivation on a large scale.

And besides, look at the morals Christianity teaches. Do any Christians follow them anyways? Well, some do, but they are the minority. Most Christians look fo rloopholes. They thinkg, "Well, what can I get away with," and such. Good moral systems make peole think, "How should I be?"
And as I mentioned on a previous post, the Bible and God are immoral. God endorses the erradication of 'infidels' and homosexuals, etc....

I can't remember the author of the following quote, nor is it correct word for word:

"If one were to follow the teaching of the Old Testament, he would be a criminal. If one were to follow the New, he would be insane."

A Christian could argue that since I have only read the Bible once in its' entirety, that I interpreted certain passages incorrectly. They just can seem to get through their tiny minds that by interpreting the passages they find undesirable, they are ignoring the true meaning. Take this passage from Deuteronomy 13:6-10 for instance:

"If your brother, your mother's son, or your son or daughter, or the wife you cherish, or your friend who is as your own soul, entice you secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods' (whom neither you nor your fathers have known, of the gods of the peoples who are around you, near you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end),
you shall not yield to him or listen to him; and your eye shall not pity him, nor shall you spare or conceal him.
But you shall surely kill him; your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people."
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy 13:6-9;&version=49;

Hypocritically, Christians add their own 'moral' and 'mystical' meanings to these passages. They seem to be completely blocked from ever reading the following passage:

In Deuteronomy 1:13-" God says, "Whatever I am now commanding you, you must keep and observe, adding nothing to it, taking nothing away."

What more can I say? :)

By Fox
We don't need to even get started on the treatment of women and the religious implications for women, not only in Islam, where it is most pronounced today, but also in Christianity and Judaism.

True don't need to, but why not! :1orglaugh
Also, thank you for supporting my arguement. You made very good points. I can support all them in return, but that will have to wait 'cause its late! :angels:
 

pitino

are you talking to me?
yes i believe in a "higher" power...



note: wars aren't made in the name of God. Relegions are the cause...
 
I'm not sure, but this is a great way to segue into something I saw on TV just now, that made me sick to the stomach.

It was a former Muslim, who has converted to Christianity, and is now preaching to a church. He was very loud and looked a lot like one of the sports analysts on ESPN (shaved head, beard, glasses)...

Anyway, I only watched for 10 minutes but in that ten minutes, he managed to not say, but SHOUT all of these views to the masses of beaming, clapping, transfixed followers:

* Someone asked me what I think of immigrant aliens. I asked her if she meant illegals. She said, "that's not a very sensitive term." I said, "why be sensitive about it? I have three things to say to anyone that comes to these shores: 1. Learn the language, 2. Pay your taxes, 3. Stop whining!

* I'm tired of political correctness telling us that we have to respect other ways of thinking and other ways of life. In our denomination, there IS no other way of thinking. There is either our lord and saviour, or there is eternal damnation. One or the other. We are not wishy-washy on the essentials. Either you accept Jesus or you don't.

* Never be afraid to be single-minded. You SHOULD be dogmatic about Jesus as saviour. All of the other denominations that are not firm on accepting Christ appear and fall by the wayside. We are still standing, because we do not compromise. THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY.

* Every other religion wants to destroy you and eliminate you. The Lord Jesus does not wish to destroy them, but to convert them and SAVE them.

* Other religions wish you death, our religion wishes them life.

* The United Nations is a joke. It is not United. The only thing it is United in is its hatred of America, and it's hatred of Israel. They burn our flags, then they ask us for money for matches.

* The real United Nations is here in our church. The only thing that can truly unite these nations is Jesus Christ. Any nation that accepts Jesus Christ will be united with the other Christian nations.

* There are 400 million Muslims that want to see every Jew destroyed. It is our duty as Christians to defend these victims from this hatred, even though they do not share our faith.

There were so many more... it made me sick. This man was angry, he was militant, and he was spouting so many of the right-wing, closed-minded, fascist ideals that I hear from the right wing. I know that there are churches that are genuinely peace-loving and not hatemongering. But this, my friends, was truly hatemongering. It was on basic cable television. Can you imagine if there were a Muslim or Jewish or Buddhist cleric saying those same things on basic cable? There would be an outcry.

It made me very sad to hear this. I hear those kinds of thoughts from fascists like Bill O'Reilly or the ultra-right kids of NSA and FBI and NRA Dads at my University, GMU. I don't expect to hear such hateful and disrespectful and dangerous brainwashing talk from so-called Christian leaders. And I don't expect to see it on TV. If Clear Channel and the like lets THAT kind of rhetoric through but nothing that severely criticizes Christianity or the government, then maybe those are the opinions held by our media moguls? Or maybe our media moguls are well-funded by those with those beliefs, or those whose interests lie in the proliferation of those beliefs?

I have nothing more to say. I don't hate religion per se, I don't hate any single denomination for what it is, but I hated... I HATED... the words I heard today. You may agree with some of those views, but those views were spoken in the name of Jesus, those views were attributed to God and to Christianity... and to me, there is no difference between attributing THOSE hateful attitudes and scare tactics to Christianity, than there is to attributing the hatred of Jews and the support of terrorism to Islam. Yet this is is happening under our noses, and there is no rebuke, there is no response, because the sad truth is, these views are popular in America today, so it's easy to fuse them with Christianity when in fact they could not be further removed from what Christianity means, and are actually just one man's nationalistic, patriotic, elitist soapbox preaching on political issues...

Fox


His last part seemed pretty peaceful, I guess it depends on how you look at it.

At first I agreed with the guy and then immediately disagreed; he said "I'm tired of political correctness telling us that we have to respect other ways of thinking and other ways of life" and I was like "I can so relate to that" and then he went on about Jesus Christ, then he said "Never be afraid to be single-minded" and againt I thought I could relate but again, it turned out to be about Jesus Christ!

Anyway, the real reason I wanted to post was about the alien question, whether they are ever mentioned in the bible. Some prophet, I forget his name, is said to fly to the sky on a train of fire, many people believe this is actually a spaceship. These are of course the same people that believe Androids from the future built the Great Pyramids of Egypt.
 
Thanks for sharing, Fox. This is an excellent Testimony to Christianity in America. And as both you and I know, Christianity's methods of controlling the masses are very to similar to Islam's, and Judea's. Perhaps the only difference is the money profits Christianity rakes in from its' willing subscribers.
 
Yes
 
Top