Search results

Too bad not all people who believe in God have any religious book that they follow.

Yeah I know. I thought you were suggesting that the design argument was sound in which case, you'd have to define what X is. But it seems I misinterpreted you.

What is this X that exists that is too complex to have occurred randomly or naturally?

How do you get from "you can't get something from nothing" to the conclusion that there is a god?

Why does something have to "start" the big bang? Even if something had to start it, why does whatever started it need a creator? If these other universes need a creator simply because they exist, then wouldn't God need a creator simply because he exists? But then of course, you'd say no, God...

Well, yes he was. Descartes experimented and saw how many beliefs he could doubt were true. He could doubt that the world around him existed because there could be an evil demon that deceived him into thinking the outside world existed. He then got onto his own existence. Could one doubt his own...

Well I was attempting to dispute his arguments that the universe was started by God. I forgot to say whether I believed in one or not. I do not.

Can't believe I did that.

It seems IMDB is inconsistent with itself. According to this link, Hilary Duff was born Sept. 28th, 1987. That would make her 18 years old as of yesterday, not 19. At any rate, I don't really care to see her naked, just thought it was interesting that IMDB would say two different things.

So you're using the Kalam Cosmological Argument. 1. If beginning, then caused. 2. Universe had beginning. 3. Therefore, universe was caused. The fault with this argument lies in equivocation. Equivocation occurs when the same word is being used in an argument but the meaning of it has...