I'm telling ya, give Smackdown a chance tonight if you are able to watch. Just give it another chance. Actually to start liking a show you will probably have to follow it for a month.

no way. i look at the spoilers and see what taker and benoit do, and if they have a good segment (not just a win, but if they are on for like 15 minutes and not just a cameo) then i will watch. but, im still getting used to tna. maybe im still used to wrestling being on thursdays. :dunno:
 
I actually understand where you are coming from. I used to not like Smackdown myself about two years ago. I have been watching it every week this past year and now I am really into it.
I think it is sorta like a tv sitcom. What I mean by this is that you have to get to know the characters and story lines to appreciate what is really going on.
Just like I thought the show The Office was stupid the first two episodes I watched. Once I watched the whole season I understood what each character and loved it.
I hope that made sense.
 
if kane were to be used in a better way, i might watch it. that would make three wrestlers worth watching for me. i want the evil kane, not the one now who is borderline. i want the kane that hooked up shane's nutsack to jumper cables. i want the kane that doused rvd in gasoline and waved matches in front of him. yes, i know it wasnt real gasoline. but, since smackdown is on network tv, that wont fly.
 
Kane looked bad ass tonight. They had him tag team with Boogeyman. I am not a Boogyman fan, but it was cool the way Kane stared at him.
I have always had the upmost respect for Kane.
Did you by chance catch the RAW episode back in 2001 or 2002 wear Triple H had sex with the corpse? If so what were your thoughts on that.
 
Kane looked bad ass tonight. They had him tag team with Boogeyman. I am not a Boogyman fan, but it was cool the way Kane stared at him.
I have always had the upmost respect for Kane.
Did you by chance catch the RAW episode back in 2001 or 2002 wear Triple H had sex with the corpse? If so what were your thoughts on that.

you want my thoughts on the necrophilia angle? i have never been disgusted with wrestling except on two occasions. one is when mae young gave birth to mark henry's baby, but it was only a hand. two was the worst. necrophilia. i have no idea what could have possibly been going through the creative teams heads. then again, this is vince. i heard he wanted to do an incest angle with stephanie. i actually turned off raw after HHH pulled that stunt and skipped the rest of the show.


on a brighter side, kane and boogeyman? why is the boogeyman not undertaker's bitch yet? :dunno:
 
why is the boogeyman not undertaker's bitch yet? :dunno:

Very good question. I am not a fan of Boogeyman. I think he plays his character VERY VERY WELL. The thing I cant stand is him eating those worms. That makes me sick thinking about it.
I respect him for his willing to do whatever it takes to play his character, but I just HATE watching him eat worms. He really is not that good of a wrestler either.
 
Very good question. I am not a fan of Boogeyman. I think he plays his character VERY VERY WELL. The thing I cant stand is him eating those worms. That makes me sick thinking about it.
I respect him for his willing to do whatever it takes to play his character, but I just HATE watching him eat worms. He really is not that good of a wrestler either.

oh, boogeyman is nothing. i dont mind the worms, its him i hate. no talent hack he is. but, i meant the supernatural thing. kane was undertaker's bitch. not bitch, just tough love. but boogeyman will never have what kane has. talent.
 
but boogeyman will never have what kane has. talent.

I concur. That means I agree.

Now continuing on from the pound for pound thread.
A few wrestlers have dipped their feet into the MMA world.

Sean O'Haire, who is one of my favorite wrestlers, but got his ass kicked in MMA.

Goldberg... Not sure if he ever ended up fighting in Japan or not.

Angle has been offered a very lucrative deal to do so, but is hesitant

Undertaker likes MMA. Doubt he would hold up well at first. I am sure if he was trained he could do a damn good job. For a big man he is very quick.

Benoit could hold his own on the wrestling part of MMA but I am not sure how well he would do at the striking part.
Any thoughts on my statements? Any other wrestlers you would like to add?
 
I concur. That means I agree.
um, you win. :1orglaugh

Now continuing on from the pound for pound thread.
A few wrestlers have dipped their feet into the MMA world.

Sean O'Haire, who is one of my favorite wrestlers, but got his ass kicked in MMA.
i never liked his look or wrestling ability. i think jindrak had better ability.

Goldberg... Not sure if he ever ended up fighting in Japan or not.
nope. he bitched out. at least lesnar followed through.

Angle has been offered a very lucrative deal to do so, but is hesitant
i really thought he would go there, and was pissed when i first found out that he signed with tna.

Undertaker likes MMA. Doubt he would up well at first. I am sure if he was trained he could do a damn good job. For a big man he is very quick.[/QUOTE=pornlover21;1352830]
he doesnt know, or have the capability, for quick reversals. he is too tall. i agree that he can throw some punches, but as a real fighter. in MMA, he wont last a month. undertaker is not a fighter. he is a puncher. a boxer. thats not fighting. fighting takes a hell of a lot more than punches. what gives wrestlers the edge to fight MMA, is their ability to have numerous escapes from submission holds. benoit and angle can hold their own. no way can they beat emililanko, but they would be midcard status. undertaker cant hold his own with those fighters. :2 cents:

Any other wrestlers you would like to add?[/QUOTE=pornlover21;1352830]
off the top of my head, no.but give me time. im sure i can think of one.
 
i think jindrak had better ability.

You bet Jindrak had better ability. Jindrak is one of my all time favorites. He ranks up there with William Regal in my book. I know he was really not one of the greatest, but he was a personal favorite of mine.

I did not know Lesnar ended up doing MMA. How many fights did he have and did he win? Who did he fight? This is news to me as I have never heard anything about it.
 
You bet Jindrak had better ability. Jindrak is one of my all time favorites. He ranks up there with William Regal in my book. I know he was really not one of the greatest, but he was a personal favorite of mine.

I did not know Lesnar ended up doing MMA. How many fights did he have and did he win? Who did he fight? This is news to me as I have never heard anything about it.

i dont know his record or who he fought. :dunno:

william regal. you want to know why i like regal? lets face it, i hate his character. but, when it comes to inside the ring knowledge in both wrestling and the business, regal is the one the wrestlers go to for any advice they may want. thats the only reason that regal is still with the wwf. kind of reminds me of bret. but regal goes further.


no arguement on my taker thought?
 
Not really any arguements here on your Undertaker thoughts. I agree with you for the most part. The only thing I think I could really argue is that I think he does have the quickness to do reversals.
Taker knows lots of wrestling holds and escapes. I dont think it would take him long to learn more. Believe it or not Taker can wrestle when he wants to.
I do think he is getting too old for MMA.
I agree that he is a puncher, but in order to do MMA he would really have to improve more there.
I think his size and strength alone would be the biggest help for him.

As far as your Regal thoughts go I can argue a little there. His character is the typical foreign heel. Regal is one of the top five if not the top three technical wrestlers in the world. Watch the match on Benoits DVD that those two had.
You are correct about him being in the business to give advice, knowledge, and training to those younger wrestlers. Read Regals book if you get a chance. It is very good. Then again I know you said you only like baseball books.
 
Not really any arguements here on your Undertaker thoughts. I agree with you for the most part. The only thing I think I could really argue is that I think he does have the quickness to do reversals.
Taker knows lots of wrestling holds and escapes. I dont think it would take him long to learn more. Believe it or not Taker can wrestle when he wants to.
I do think he is getting too old for MMA.
I agree that he is a puncher, but in order to do MMA he would really have to improve more there.
I think his size and strength alone would be the biggest help for him.
he is too tall. id much rather fight a tall guy than a small guy.

As far as your Regal thoughts go I can argue a little there. His character is the typical foreign heel. Regal is one of the top five if not the top three technical wrestlers in the world. Watch the match on Benoits DVD that those two had.
You are correct about him being in the business to give advice, knowledge, and training to those younger wrestlers. Read Regals book if you get a chance. It is very good. Then again I know you said you only like baseball books.
i have never read a wrestling book. not when mankind started it, and not now. i watch the dvds. my favorite besides austins, was brets. i didnt get up for anything. i loved his biography. andre's was quite interesting too.
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
I am never going to watch Wrestling again if:

Batista regains the title

MVP beats benoit

or Cena retains his title
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
Top