Hmmmm... Where to start? Well, first if someone could tell me how to use the mulit quote feature this would be much easier. Instead I will just have to put quotes in quotation marks.
IAMFOREVER WROTE:
"um, anything on smackdown is not a push. its the minor league. raw is the flagship show. if you are not on raw, then you suck. i know, i know, taker and benoit. thats been pissing me off for a long time that they are still on smackdown."
I concur with you, that means I agree, that Raw is the flagship show. Smackdown is NOT considered the minor leagues of wrestling what so ever. The minor leagues of wreslting are groups such as ROH, JAPW, numerous NWA affiliates, CZW, etc. Any independant wrestler would kill to have a shot on Smackdown. Smackdown is a world wide promotion. A world wide organization with a regular TV show, championships defended around the world, and sold out arena's is anything but minor league. Just because the show is on Friday nights does not mean it is minor league.
Until 1993 WWF was on Saturday night TV or Saturday morning programming. I guess it just depended what area you live in. That did not make them minor league.
BBB WROTE:
"The only reason that Duce and Domino won the tag titles on Smackdown is because London and Kedrick, took my advice ad are going to go there seperate ways and fight for the Cruserweight belt."
I hope they do fight for the Cruiserweight belt, and I also hope they remain a tag team just to keep up the good quality tag matches.
BBB wrote:
"The only reason that the Undertaker and Benoit are on Smackdown is that if they were not, WWE would end up with two ECWs on there hands. they do not want this. The only ever watch Smackdown if the Undertaker and Benoit are going to be on the show, and then I only watch the matches they are in. If it were not for Undertaker and Benoit, Smckdwon would have no fans and be a crap program like ECW"
People said the same thing after The Rock and Stone Cold retired. They said Raw would go to shit. The ratings did drop a little, but they jumped back up. Why was this? Well, WWE had to build up wrestlers and characters to main event status. Take away Taker and Benoit and you do have a weaker roster, but you also have a solid core of individuals who can jump into main event status in a heart beat. There are lots of wrestlers not being used that have tons of potential to be used the right way. Look at Jericho and Austin in WCW. They were not utilized properly and then WWE used them properly and they took off. Same thing with Eddie.
ECW is getting better. We will NEVER see the original ECW again. McMahon is getting away from that. He is making it "family oriented". ECW is, in most peoples opinion, including mine, the worst of the three shows. Just give it time to develop. You will see some break out stars going through the ECW rankings.
BBB wrote:
"Take for example Lance Cade and Trevor Murrdoch are getting a push and they suck at wrestling. Yet Ric Flair is constantly in crappy undeserving story lines"
Cade and Murdoch are a true tag team. The are a perfect heel team. Lance Cade is one of the best technical wrestlers on the RAW roster. He had to learn, and he learned quickly, how to brawl and be a proper tag wrestler. Remember the Cade and Regal team? Great technical skills. Cade used to be a wrestler that worked one body part an entire match. He was considered an old school guy. He was not the OVW champ for nothing. Murdoch will give you a good match anytime he wrestles. That guy has more talent than you think. He might not be in the best shape, but he uses that for his gimmick.
BBB WROTE:
"WWE needs to switch up the rosters. Put all the great wrestlers on Raw, and put the mid card guys that have a bit of potential and never reach it on smackdown and the fire all the crappy guys that they dislike as much as the fans do"
I have to concur with you, that means agree, that a roster switch would not hurt. Why would you want to fire the crappy guys that the fans do not like? Then you lose your heels. Then you have good guy vs good guy. That would be boring. I would not watch if it was like that. Why fire a guy like Umaga? You lose a talented big guy wrestlers who plays a perfect foreign heel that the fans love to hate.
BBB WROTE:
"OH and they need to have the divas take part in every segment and storyline, which would get the 18-30 age group of fans tuning in each and every week"
I love looking at Divas too, but every segmant would be boring. You might pick up a few 18-30 fans but you will lose a lot of the die hard wrestling fans. Fans like me want to see good wrestling and not just woman rolling around. When I want to see that I come to freeones.com.
IAMFOREVER wrote:
"i say get rid of most. especially the ones who cant wrestle. except torrie, naturally."
I couldnt agree more. Surprisingly Candice has shows great improvement. I actually like watching her wrestle now. The true wrestling ones are Victoria, Mickie James, Melina, and now Candice. I miss Trish and Lita. They both did wonders for the womens division. Maria is GREAT to use for her backstage interview humor. She plays a great ditz and adds comedy for the other male wrestlers during her interviews. WWE needs to check out SHIMMER (the all womens group) These ladies can wrestle like no other and they are hot.
I also agree that they never should have fired Jazz or Molly. I would do Molly. She was not that ugly. Jazz was just hideous but they both could wrestle greatly.