Am I the only one who thinks the WWE roster is a bit, ahem....weak ?
It's not that the roster is
weak as such, there are a lot of good wrestlers, it's just that everybody is midcard. Only Cena and the Evolution boys are credible main eventers aside from the champion (for now) Daniel Bryan, and that's down to longevity rather than favourable booking. With Cena and Orton/Batista busy with Wyatt and The Shield respectively, it left Bryan stuck with Kane. Take a look at the guys that were competing in that Intercontinental title contenders tournament :
1) Rob Van Dam
2) Alberto Del Rio
3) Sheamus
4) Jack Swagger
5) Cesaro
6) Mark Henry
7) Bad News Barrett
8) Dolph Ziggler
You see a lineup like that competiting for a crack at a secondary title and you're inclined to think the roster is deep and the main event scene must be amazing, but it isn't, because all the guys involved (perhaps with the exception of Cesaro) have been victims of stop-start booking. Surely a lot of these guys, in kayfabe, should be aiming for higher than a crack at a secondary belt? Presumably these are the same guys that will make up the numbers in Money In The Bank in July, and you've basically got six former World Champions, and two guys that had already been there, done that. Barrett a 3-time former I champion, and Cesaro on the way up and already with an interminable US title reign under his belt. Barrett is probably the only one with anything to gain (after a long time off) from a run with a minor title and the rest of them could be up there earning a title shot, but "former World Champion" doesn't carry any weight any more, because everyone has wrestled everyone and everyone has BEATEN everyone so many times.
At the moment things are better than they've been for a while, in that there are a fair few acts that I want to see - Daniel Bryan (before he got hurt), The Shield, The Wyatts, The Usos, Paige, Ziggler and Cesaro. That's a fair few more than this time last year and infinitely more than two years ago.
C M who??