if wcw had never been bought by vince, would there have been tna?
no.. tna only formed cause vince bought wcw..
:2 cents:
if wcw had never been bought by vince, would there have been tna?
no.. tna only formed cause vince bought wcw..
:2 cents:
If Vince didn't buy out WCW, Jeff Jarrett would have still had a job and wouldn't have needed to create TNA. Likewise, half of TNA's roster would have still had jobs and wouldn't have needed to go to TNA for a paycheck.
i wish vince had never bought out wcw, because it was a trillion time batter than this bulshit garbage tna calls wrestling
what if vince were to buy tna?
Vince never should have bought out ECW. Hopefully TNA will turn it back to the way it used to be.
I know it is the wrong place to be looking for logic, but I don't understand WWE anymore. Because Barrett won NXT means he can go toe-to-toe with a nine-time world champion? What makes NXT so dangerous besides the numbers? There are three former world champions on Cena's team and the other two are former Intercontinental/US champions, not to mention that Khali (in kayfabe anyway) used to be a unstopable monster. Logically they shouldn't have any problems defeating a group of "rookies", even if they fill the two empty spots with Maryse and Santino. I could believe NXT could defeat WWE wrestlers if they still had Danielson because they hyped him up.
And another thing: Why the hell does WWE not want to compare Sheamus to Lesnar? They always have the announcers say that Sheamus has risen to the top faster than any other superstar; what exactly is so bad about comparing his rise to Lesnar's? It makes it sound all the more impressive if they compare Sheamus to a multiple time WWE and current-UFC champion. It makes your company seem much more impressive if you mention once and awhile that a former world champion of yours is now UFC Champion. Everyone knows Lesnar is one tough SOB; doesn't it make Sheamus that much more impressive if you mention him and Lesnar in the same sentence? You have a chance to compare (favouritively, I might add) your WWE Champion - a guy who not everyone is sold on having as Champion - to a former (very sucessful) employee of your company who is now one of the toughest men in the world.
I know it is the wrong place to be looking for logic, but I don't understand WWE anymore. Because Barrett won NXT means he can go toe-to-toe with a nine-time world champion? What makes NXT so dangerous besides the numbers? There are three former world champions on Cena's team and the other two are former Intercontinental/US champions, not to mention that Khali (in kayfabe anyway) used to be a unstopable monster. Logically they shouldn't have any problems defeating a group of "rookies", even if they fill the two empty spots with Maryse and Santino. I could believe NXT could defeat WWE wrestlers if they still had Danielson because they hyped him up.
And another thing: Why the hell does WWE not want to compare Sheamus to Lesnar? They always have the announcers say that Sheamus has risen to the top faster than any other superstar; what exactly is so bad about comparing his rise to Lesnar's? It makes it sound all the more impressive if they compare Sheamus to a multiple time WWE and current-UFC champion. It makes your company seem much more impressive if you mention once and awhile that a former world champion of yours is now UFC Champion. Everyone knows Lesnar is one tough SOB; doesn't it make Sheamus that much more impressive if you mention him and Lesnar in the same sentence? You have a chance to compare (favouritively, I might add) your WWE Champion - a guy who not everyone is sold on having as Champion - to a former (very sucessful) employee of your company who is now one of the toughest men in the world.
Maryse, Melina's back...There are some good reasons to still watch RAW, but it's not the Nexus
Maryse, Melina's back...
There are some good reasons to still watch RAW, but it's not the Nexus
Sheamus, The Miz, Bourne and Y2J