Re: Worst (WTF were they thinking) Monents, Events and Bad Ideas in Comic Book Histor
Do you know what I think the worst part of Liefeld's art is besides the fact he just sucks? It's that in two freaking decades he hasn't improved at all or learned anything. That's rare for any serious artist in any profession. It goes to show he just doesn't give a crap.
I loathed the multi-comic crossovers back when I was still buying them. They weren't fooling anybody with the scam like nature even if there were people who still bought them.
I would even go further though and say there should never be more than one ongoing title for any superhero ever with maybe the exceptions of Spider-man, Superman, and Batman, and that's only because of who they are and also because of tradition with Action and Detective Comics having been around forever. Even then I would limit them two two at the very most. There was a point where the number of Batman comics coming out at one time was well beyond ridiculous and it would turn me off to buying any of them in the first place.
Do you know what I think the worst part of Liefeld's art is besides the fact he just sucks? It's that in two freaking decades he hasn't improved at all or learned anything. That's rare for any serious artist in any profession. It goes to show he just doesn't give a crap.
Here's something to add to the list...the multi-comic title crossover. There was one point where you couldn't read a complete story without having to buy 4 or 5 different comic titles. There was an entire 3 year period where you couldn't read Amazing Spider-Man without having to read Spectacular Spider-Man, Web of Spider-Man and the Sensational Spider-Man. You couldn't read Batman without also reading Detective Comics, Shadow of the Bat, legend of the Bat and Gotham Knights. It was an industry wide scam to get you to either buy titles which you were not currently buying and/or Trade Paperbacks and Hard Covers which were released a few months later. It's a practice which still exists, but not to the extent it did in the 90's.
I loathed the multi-comic crossovers back when I was still buying them. They weren't fooling anybody with the scam like nature even if there were people who still bought them.
I would even go further though and say there should never be more than one ongoing title for any superhero ever with maybe the exceptions of Spider-man, Superman, and Batman, and that's only because of who they are and also because of tradition with Action and Detective Comics having been around forever. Even then I would limit them two two at the very most. There was a point where the number of Batman comics coming out at one time was well beyond ridiculous and it would turn me off to buying any of them in the first place.