Worst Movie Ending Ever

The ending in the book is a million times better.

Agreed :thumbsup: They gave it a shitty "hollywood" ending the introduction of the woman and the kid was a total cop out so that they could have all their basis covered when it came to the box office. Which in turn turned the movie into a 6ft tall pile of shit, I dont know why movie studios feel the need to have to change stories because its what they think is better for the audience, like they are so in touch with reality.
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
Agreed :thumbsup: They gave it a shitty "hollywood" ending the introduction of the woman and the kid was a total cop out so that they could have all their basis covered when it came to the box office. Which in turn turned the movie into a 6ft tall pile of shit, I dont know why movie studios feel the need to have to change stories because its what they think is better for the audience, like they are so in touch with reality.

My dad told me about the book long before the movie came out, so I picked it up. After reading the book and then hearing they were making a movie out of it (with Will Smith starring in it too) I was like "FUCK...YEAH!!!"

Then, they changed the ending for the movie to make it "better", but it only made it worse.

I wish did read the book, without seeing this crappy movie. If the book was better than the movie!

Get the book and read it. It's fucking awesome. The movie was a 6/10 but the book was a 9/10.

It actually explains "what" those weird, vampire-like things were and the ending is soooooo much better.
 
anger management. the whole thing was a big set-up by his girlfriend and everybody was just pretending, even the judge. unbelievably stupid ending:mad:

how many times have you seen this movie?

you are mistaken, the whole thing was NOT a set up, and everybody was not pretnding

it was just Buddy (jack nicholson)
 
There's way too much complaining in this thread about endings that challenge you. I didn't really like No Country for Old Men, but I thought the ending was really interesting. It made you think about everything that had happened up to that point and it fit into the entire ethos of the movie. If you want your stories tied up in a little bow by the end go back and read the Hardy Boys for God's sake.
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
There's way too much complaining in this thread about endings that challenge you. I didn't really like No Country for Old Men, but I thought the ending was really interesting. It made you think about everything that had happened up to that point and it fit into the entire ethos of the movie. If you want your stories tied up in a little bow by the end go back and read the Hardy Boys for God's sake.

The "point" that No Country For Old Men made was ok...the way they executed it though, was pure and total crap.
 
There's way too much complaining in this thread about endings that challenge you. I didn't really like No Country for Old Men, but I thought the ending was really interesting. It made you think about everything that had happened up to that point and it fit into the entire ethos of the movie. If you want your stories tied up in a little bow by the end go back and read the Hardy Boys for God's sake.

I have also seen a lot of movies and novels that have used that as an excuse to either be sloppy or because the author couldn't dome up with a decent way to conclude a story. I do in fact like what happens in a conclusion of a story to be unambiguous and clear unless there is a very important reason in the story why that isn't the case (Like there is going to be a sequel, it's only a little part of a larger story, or the ambiguous part is almost the basis for the entire work in the first place). All loose ends should also be cleared up. I'm not a fan of going though a work of fiction just to end up not knowing what happens in it.
 
Rush Hour 3: Watched it over the weekend and I found the end to be very disappointing.
 
adaptation: great movie until the end
 
Top