Worst films you have seen

Sikei said:
S.W.A.T.
Troy
Last Samurai
The One
Madagascar

Thought S.W.A.T. wasn't bad not great but watchable.
Last Samurai was Tom Cruise best film to date.
Don't know which The One your talking about but if Jet Li's it's not to bad.Plenty of action story a bit weak but seen a lot worst.
 
Alone in the Dark. It pretty much ignored the game entierly, which made it a rather crappy game -> movie conversion. Don't get me wrong, it was spectacularly bad regardless. Tara Reid cast as a scientist? What's next, Mr. T in a romantic comedy?

As far as video game movies goes, even "Pong - The movie" would have a better plot than this one...
 
These are a couple of older movies--late 80's, early 90's--but they were so terrible that I will never forget them...
Leonard Part 6--Bill Cosby was in this
Bonfire of the Vanities---All-Star cast...All-Star FLOP!!!
 
so many bad movies out there!
I don't like the matrix and lord of the rings kind of movies!
The village was stupid and also Dark water as of late.
I must say I don't realy remember the realy bad ones, just as well I guess
 
Backbeat, probably none of you have seen this, but it's a film about the beatles early career in Liverpool and Nueremburg (sp). The film was cast horribly and the acting was terrible. I did like the subject matter being a fan of the Beatles, but I could not get past horrible acting.
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...
The worst film I´ve ever saw was Alien vs Predator. I mean, there seems to be no action like I know from the older alien movies that I liked to watch.
As I saw the trailer and read something about the plot I thoght that the movie has verything to make an alien fan like me satisfy. But it wasn´t. Very very sad.
 
Nightcrawler said:
Backbeat, probably none of you have seen this, but it's a film about <a style='text-decoration: none; border-bottom: 3px double;' href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=22&k=the%20beatles" onmouseover="window.status='the beatles'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;">the beatles</a> early career in Liverpool and Nueremburg (sp). The film was cast horribly and the acting was terrible. I did like the subject matter being a fan of the Beatles, but I could not get past horrible acting.

Another problem with this film was it had a lot of time errors.Example most of the scene's of them on or near a road there was always something in the shot not from that time era.
 
I only saw the film once, and that was many years ago..so I didn't notice those time errors. I just could not get over the fact that none of the actors even remotely looked like any of the beatles. especailly the actor that played John, he did not even closely resemble John. The film was shot on a very low budget so it's no wonders these errors are there.

Usually films involving real people are cast pretty well and they are believable as the person they are portraying..good examples are The Doors, What's Love Got To Do With It, Malcolm X, Aviator (I don't know about Hughes, but the woman that played Kate Hepburn was cast pretty well.) Will Smith played a good Ali I thought. He even sounded like him.
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...
moemat2000 said:
Titantic was a gigantic piece of shit. The effects were great, but it was insufferable to sit through

That reminds me - the new Titanic DVD is supposed to have an alternate ending,

WTF could that be????
 
om3ga said:
That reminds me - the new Titanic DVD is supposed to have an alternate ending,

WTF could that be????

Aliens came managed to save the ship then enslaved all the human race for food (evil laugh).
 
Nightcrawler said:
I liked Troy, and laughed by head off at Madagascar...never did see the other ones you mentioned.

In Troy, I got the feeling, that Petersen payed more attention to the apearance of the actors, than to making a movie. But the history was not so clean than the movie shows.
And I wouldn´t belive, that the director of this movie (which is a typical example for the axiom "Show over substance") was the same director of "The Boat".

Madagascar didn´t hit my sense of humour, although I enjoyed the trailer.

poggy1 said:
Thought S.W.A.T. wasn't bad not great but watchable.
Last Samurai was Tom Cruise best film to date.
Don't know which The One your talking about but if Jet Li's it's not to bad.Plenty of action story a bit weak but seen a lot worst.

I saw not many movies, in which I counted more logical errors, than in S.W.A.T.. And I like Colin Farrel and Samuel L. Jackson, but it was an insult for me to look, how bad they are able to act (is this sentence correct?).

I´ve seen much more better movies of Tom Cruise than Last Samurai:
Top Gun, Collateral, Rain Man, The Colour Of Money, Taps,...

The One is imho the desperate bid of Jet Li to copy Jackie Chan in serious movies in the US. But I don´t like his US-movies. He did very good movies in his home-country: For example Hero, Once Upon A Time In China...

Of course, there are worse movies than mine, but, if I would say all the minor productions of my home-country, nobody would know them ;). So I restricted myself to major movies...

Sikei
 
Master And Commander starring Russell Crowe: so boring, I walked out after 40 minutes of misery.
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...
Any movie which stars Matthew Ewald:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0970866/

Both "Killer Flood: The Day the Dam Broke" & "Terminal Error" was on TV today (and I was bored)....

ugh!
 
40 days and 40 nights, so terrible, such a disappointment.
I don't know why I expected a movie starring Josh Hartnett would be good in the first place. Well, except Black Hawk Down.
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...

member20672

Closed Account
Calm said:
40 days and 40 nights, so terrible, such a disappointment.
I don't know why I expected a movie starring Josh Hartnett would be good in the first place. Well, except Black Hawk Down.
Yeah, it was a real disappointment. The movie concept and script were good, but the choice of actors sucked.
 
Top