Why Obama and his minions are in a heap of trouble

[Jack Davenport]

House investigations will result in nothing but to ensure Trump’s re-election.

The people that ultimately go to jail over Russia will be Obama administration officials. Whistle past the graveyard all that you want.The upcoming and short lived Democrat circus ( which I am praying includes impeachment) will make it possible for Trump’s DOJ to finally start pursuing criminal charges against the Clintons and Obama officials if not Obama himself.

Can’t wait!

Get Ready Tex.

 

[xfire]

^^

:1orglaugh:rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl: :weeping::weeping::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl::1orglaugh

Dat

Matt

Whitaker

:1orglaugh:rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl: :weeping::weeping::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl::1orglaugh

 

[Jack Davenport]

^^

:1orglaugh:rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl: :weeping::weeping::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl::1orglaugh

Dat

Matt

Whitaker

:1orglaugh:rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl: :weeping::weeping::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::rofl2::rofl2::rofl::rofl::1orglaugh

I appreciate you honoring animus and myself by using our posting styles “ Dat” and so on but get it right, it’s “tho” not “though”.

The new AG will be prosecuting the Obama criminals not Whitaker.
This is what I get for trying to have a conversation about legal matters with those ignorant in law.

 

[xfire]

Whitaker is the acting AG, I assumed you meant Whitaker is who will be prosecuting Obama. Because Jeff Sessions wouldn't right? Because Gowdy & Nunes being chairmen of powerful committees wouldn't investigate Obama, right? Please stop calling me, "ignorant", at best you're projecting.

 

[xfire]

The upcoming and short lived Democrat circus ( which I am praying includes impeachment) will make it possible for Trump’s DOJ to finally start pursuing criminal charges against the Clintons and Obama officials if not Obama himself.

Just to correct an obvious error, Trump does not have a DOJ.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Whitaker is the acting AG, I assumed you meant Whitaker is who will be prosecuting Obama. Because Jeff Sessions wouldn't right? Because Gowdy & Nunes being chairmen of powerful committees wouldn't investigate Obama, right? Please stop calling me, "ignorant", at best you're projecting.

You are not educated in law, you are ignorant in almost every aspect of legal discussion. Your comments about the “ law of the land” and Maxine Waters releasing tax info demonstrates your ignorance for all to see.

I make a living in the legal profession, you do not.
You assume far too much all of the time. I’ve created a thread to lay out why Obama and his associates should be worried and it triggers you to the point that you cannot offer any rebuttal to my assertions, you just shit all over threads that you don’t like.

Feel free to disagree here but bring facts and try to be informed. You have not demonstrated a propensity for that so far.

 

[xfire]

Keep calling me ignorant and I will report you for taunting and harassment.

Whether or not you are actually a lawyer has been the source of some debate.
I really don't care either way and it certainly doesn't make your opinions and ranting any more valid than anyone else.

Best you can hope for is that Putin's Puppet President Trump asks Gowdy to be Attorney General, which I wholly endorse.
I don't like Gowdy for a whole host of reasons, but he's competent and won't break the law for Trump.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Keep calling me ignorant and I will report you for taunting and harassment.

Whether or not you are actually a lawyer has been the source of some debate.
I really don't care either way and it certainly doesn't make your opinions and ranting any more valid than anyone else.

Best you can hope for is that Putin's Puppet President Trump asks Gowdy to be Attorney General, which I wholly endorse.
I don't like Gowdy for a whole host of reasons, but he's competent and won't break the law for Trump.

I said you are ignorant in the law, you are, report it if you’d like. You are posting on a thread that I started and not the other way around. Good luck in making the argument that I am somehow harassing or taunting you.

Another observation, you’re not particularly good at trolling, or taunting but you are quite good at being annoying as you are also demonstrating here.

What you believe about my personal life is of no consequence to me. One thing is for certain, you have spent far too much time trying to identify me personally and even have attempted to send email viruses to me. I tried to be cordial to you in the past and gave you an email address away from the board but it was obvious that you were simply trying to see if I would divulge personal info to you.

You’ve even thought that you identified me as another attorney only to be proven wrong. Quite frankly you have mental issues, I would advise everyone to not get within a country mile of you. It’s getting beyond creepy now.

 

[xfire]

Nice job, everything you just accused me of is a lie. But of course, the personal attack is the only real weapon you have in your arsenal.

 

[xfire]

Prescient.

https://www.salon.com/2018/12/01/de...ld-trump-jr-from-mueller-probe-democrats-wont

 

[Jack Davenport]

Nice job, everything you just accused me of is a lie. But of course, the personal attack is the only real weapon you have in your arsenal.

1-You need to educate yourself as to what constitutes a personal attack.
2- Post a link to any thread that you have started that I have constantly tried to derail it.
No, it’s not a lie. I can produce the email of you claiming that you have identified me as an attorney across town from my office. I can also produce screenshots of your Guerilla Emails with Trojan viruses you tried to launch. Perhaps some here have a little more insight as to why me and others do not like you.

The vast majority of exchanges that we have are where you come to threads that I start, yet somehow you are being attacked personally.

The bottom line here is that it is obvious that you are not good at debate. Only throwing bombs on a thread.

 

[xfire]

Quite frankly you have mental issues, I would advise everyone to not get within a country mile of you. It’s getting beyond creepy now.

You can continue down that ugly path if you like, I won't be responding to your personal attacks, but I will continue to offer my analysis, opinion, and rebuttal of your political nonsense and Trump cheer leading.

1-You need to educate yourself as to what constitutes a personal attack.
2- Post a link to any thread that you have started that I have constantly tried to derail it.

The vast majority of exchanges that we have are where you come to threads that I start, yet somehow you are being attacked personally.

The bottom line here is that it is obvious that you are not good at debate. Only throwing bombs on a thread.

You seem to be under the mistaken assumption that you are immune to the forum rules in threads that you start.

You are entitled to your opinion of how good I may or may not be at debate, but it's just that, your opinion. I hold my own well enough.

 

[Jack Davenport]

You can continue down that ugly path if you like, I won't be responding to your personal attacks, but I will continue to offer my analysis, opinion, and rebuttal of your political nonsense and Trump cheer leading.



You seem to be under the mistaken assumption that you are immune to the forum rules in threads that you start.

You are entitled to your opinion of how good I may or may not be at debate, but it's just that, your opinion. I hold my own well enough.

I am no more immune than anyone else. You don’t like my thread , the premise or the dire consequences it holds for Obama.

This grade school act of yours of trolling and personally attacking , harassing and then blaming the other person is as transparent as it gets.

 

[xfire]

I am no more immune than anyone else. You don’t like my thread , the premise or the dire consequences it holds for Obama.

This grade school act of yours of trolling and personally attacking , harassing and then blaming the other person is as transparent as it gets.

No, you don't like my analysis, opinion, and rebuttal of your unfounded claims, so you start name calling and making personal attacks, it's a pattern you consistently engage in.

 

[xfire]

There isn't one scintilla of evidence that, "Obama and his minions are in a heap of trouble".

You made this thread to troll, taunt, mock, & generally antagonize.

Then you decided it wasn't fun anymore when Nunes was exposed as the fraud and Trump puppet that he is.

You keep bumping this thread to continue trolling, taunting, mocking, and generally antagonizing.

But, as usual, when something is posted that you don't liek, you start with the name calling, insulting, and personal attacks. Consistent pattern of behavior.

And really, it's just a plea to those that share your point-of-view to jump in and gang up on your political opponents. So fucking transparent.

 

[Jack Davenport]

There is plenty of evidence, including the FISA abuse. The thread is bumped when new information turns up. Interestingly enough some of the most recent bumps were by you. This thread is a legitimate discussion when possible. The fact that it so obviously triggers you, makes it that much more interesting.

 

[xfire]

There is plenty of evidence, including the FISA abuse. The thread is bumped when new information turns up. Interestingly enough some of the most recent bumps were by you. This thread is a legitimate discussion when possible. The fact that it so obviously triggers you, makes it that much more interesting.

Indeed, it triggers me so much that I call you ignorant and go on rants about your mental state.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Those are observations that not only I, but several others have made. Many that you’d find surprising.

 

[xfire]

I don't fucking care.

You, your "friends", my "friends", who the fuck ever can do what the fuck ever.

It's still a personal attack to call me ignorant, muse about my mental health, etc., and you do it because that's the only real weapon you have.

 

[xfire]

Many that you’d find surprising.

If there's anyone on this forum whose opinion you think I respect, that secretly has animosity towards me, they are smart enough not to let me know it.

If anyone on this forum that's supposed to be impartial doesn't like me, they too, are smart enough not to let me know it, and they might just be playing you.

You're smart enough to know whose opinions I consider shit.