Who Is Actually "As Bad As Hitler" Or Worse?

Speaking of countries that are cruel, how about the good old USA? We damn near wiped out the Indians for no good reason. You really can't say we did that much to Russia after WWII. Both sides basically had a shouting match for 50 years.

The indian thing is hard to argue against but Russia is another story. They had it coming for the longest time. I loved the special History Channel did a while back on that region. That country's foundation is made of blood
 
George W Bush

Oh jesus, here we go. As much as I hate the guy, you cannot compare him to Hitler or worse.

He's like the go-to guy anytime someone wants to get applause from anyone nowadays. He wasn't a great president but nowhere near the worst in our history, let alone being one of the worst leaders ever in all the world.

It feels like if I were having to give a speech during a wedding and it was bombing, all I'd have to is mention was Bush and people would give me the standard "Whooooooo!!!!!"
 
Guys, just wait a few monthes : When Sarah Palin will be in the White House, you'll regret good old George W. Bush...
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
More and more people are tossing around the word "Nazi" or "Hitler" to indict a person or belief they disagree with. I honestly don't care which side does it, it's petty, stupid and inaccurate. If you look hard enough at any issue you can find a criticism that will vilify any perspective.

During live television coverage of the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago, novelist Gore Vidal famously called William F. Buckley a " crypto-Nazi." To which Buckley famously replied (in addition to other choice words), "Stop calling me a crypto-Nazi or I'll sock you in the goddamn face and you'll stay plastered."

Nazism is not a useful symbol for everything that makes us angry, from Iraq to abortion to workers' rights. It is a historical movement, unique in the ambitions of its cruelty.

So, for those of you who continuously call someone "The Hitler of our time" I'll simplify this so you'll understand. Your argument inherently is doomed to fail for sheer thoughtlessness. You don't understand true evil and you are blinded by idealism and partisan thought.

That being said, I think Charlie Sheen compares unfavorably to Hitler. Fuck that guy.
 
I think the Khmer Rouge with their killing fields rank pretty high in the atrocities department, but that was more a collective than an individual.
 
Salautdin Temirbulatov and the gang of Chechen rebels he lead are about as evil as people can be. They captured 6 young Russian conscripts and promised them the status of POW. They tied them up and and while the Russian conscripts were lying on their stomachs the Chechens slit their troats one @ a time. Each of the Russian conscripts could hear and see their comrades dying until it was their turn. The Chechens stood around joking and laughing and one of them filmed everything. What Temirbulatov and his men did was an act of pure evil.
 
I think the Khmer Rouge with their killing fields rank pretty high in the atrocities department, but that was more a collective than an individual.
Pol Pot and all the higher-ups in the Khmer Rouge should have been strangled with a plastic bag and beaten to death like so many of the victims of their failed "social experiment". Entire generations where murdered, children where turned into killers and a civilization was all but wiped out on the whim of a college dropout with an axe to grind.
 
Personally, I think their are way too many evil motherfuckers who could contend for the title of absolute worst asshole ever. I think Hitler is the most well known because WW II was the biggest war on the biggest stage ever. Their are actually some people who did just as bad or worse than he did. Some you have heard of, some you haven't.
 
Top