Who are you voting/rooting for in this years election

[georges]

Terrorists have secret members, secret meetings in secret locations. You don't defeat them by waging wars against countries. You have to infiltrate and destroy from within. Bombing countries doesn't solve the problem. You have to use Intelligence. You have to do things in secret too.

that is true but it is not easy to do. waging wars against dictatorships is necessary.dictatorships are also a potential danger to developped countries

 

[Brino]

I thought this was funny and true! :rofl:
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10567341^13762,00.html

 

[Ranger]

When is the last time you slept with a Republican???:rofl: :rofl:

Ranger

What about independents?

 

[georges]

When is the last time you slept with a Republican???:rofl: :rofl:

Ranger

What about independents?

two interesting questions:thumbsup:

i wonder what brino will reply to the first one

 

[Brino]

Hey I didnt take the poll so I wouldnt know! :rofl: I just fancy myself a good lover!

BTW Independents are the the kind of people who like orgies but never quite get em right! Party crashers!

 

[georges]

Hey I didnt take the poll so I wouldnt know! :rofl: I just fancy myself a good lover!

BTW Independents are the the kind of people who like orgies but never quite get em right! Party crashers!

i am sure you already voted to the poll

independants are people having their own ideas and concepts.that is all what i can say

 

[Starman]

Originally posted by georges
that is true but it is not easy to do. waging wars against dictatorships is necessary.dictatorships are also a potential danger to developped countries

Since when did it become USA's duty to be the World Police? Have you heard of something called the United Nations (UN)? USA didn't wait to get the UN mandate to attack Iraq, thus making the war a violation to international rights. The "proof/evidence" Bush claimed he had was false and weak. Bush didn't want to show the proof he claimed he had, and as he didn't wanted to put his "evidence" under scrutiny, of course many countries didn't want to support him. You have to have proof/evidence for your allegations, even in the international politics.

There's many more dicatorships, for example Saudi Arabia who maybe habours the highest number of terrorists in the Middle East, but did Bush attack them? No, because those dictatorships are "friends".

And on a little funnier note, but still in the same subject, here's a funny (political) film:
Why we must invade Iraq right now! - http://www.markfiore.com/animation/corrections.html

 

[Starman]

Originally posted by Starman
Okay, maybe I should clarified by saying:
"Yes, what did G.W. Bush do to Canada except for making Canada and the rest of the countries of the Western World EVEN MORE THE objects of hate and targets for terrorism?"

In the manner that Bush has choosed to do his war on terrorism has given a tremendous recruitment drive to the terrorist organizations. Now they can tell people, "Look, we were right, they attacked and waged warfare on us, just as we said they would do. We warned you that USA and the rest of the Western World were evil, what more reasons do you need to join our cause?" It doesn't take more than a basic knowledge in psychology to understand this, if you just stop and think, instead of acting on irrational anger and violent tendencies like Bush and his men did.

Originally posted by Starman
Terrorists have secret members, secret meetings in secret locations. You don't defeat them by waging wars against countries. You have to infiltrate and destroy from within. Bombing countries doesn't solve the problem. You have to use Intelligence. You have to do things in secret too.

I guess I have to further elaborate these examples, then maybe my point comes through even clearer.

Now, Georges and you other Bush supporters, imagine that a French terrorist organization attacks USA.
USA wants to attack France. As pretense the American president gives the words resolve, weapons of mass destruction (which in France's case actually is true), fighting terrorism and so on.
USA does not get UN mandate, because most educated people knows that it's idiotic trying to fight terrorism by bombing countries to smitherines.
The president of USA does decide to attack anyway.
They bomb France, destroying the Eiffel Tower and the Triumphal Arch are smashed to ruins and rubble. Likewise with many civilian homes.
Many of your friends and family, Georges, are killed in the assault.
As terrorists operate in secret, with secret members, secret meetings at secret locations, there's no way to determine if any terrorists, if any at all, got killed.
What's for certain though is that many innocents have died, including many of your family members and friends.

Now, Georges, would you commemorate, compliment, and congratulate, the American president for his [sarcasm]excellent[/sarcasm] method for fighting terrorism, or would you be angry and hateful, and maybe even join the French terrorist organization yourself?

 

[Starman]

Originally posted by georges
independants are people having their own ideas and concepts.that is all what i can say

And having other ideas than Bush is wrong? *LOL*

 

[Ranger]

I don't know if that is such a good example using a french terrorist organization...................If it was state sponsored, it would become an act of war. It would not need a UN mandate.

I don't know, maybe I read it wrong.

Ranger

 

[Starman]

Originally posted by Ranger
I don't know if that is such a good example using a french terrorist organization...................If it was state sponsored, it would become an act of war. It would not need a UN mandate.

I don't know, maybe I read it wrong.

Ranger

Well, just because it's French, doesn't have to mean it's state sponsored.

I used France, because it's close to home for Georges, thus maybe making my point more clear.

Saudi Arabia sponsor terrorists though. If Iraq did I do not know, but I haven't heard any real claims of that yet. Afghanistan did though, that's one of the reasons to why UN gave USA permission to attack Afghanistan.

Well, I'm glad you show you read it, I thought I would get ignored, like you and Georges sometimes do to with my posts.

 

[georges]

i always hated countries who support andfinance terrorism they are also indirectly terrorists because they support terrorism.

 

[anobody]

America declares war on terrorism and supplies weapons to terrorists

irony, or just stupidity?

 

[parker]

america declares war on terrorism and supplies weapons to terrorists

irony, or just stupidity?

It's ingenious if you're a defense contractor.
:ak47:

 

[georges]

america declares war on terrorism and supplies weapons to terrorists

irony, or just stupidity?

:ak47: maybe you lack of intelligence

 

[Starman]

Originally posted by georges
:ak47: maybe you lack of intelligence

Uh, Georges, remember our talk about calming down before you make a post? Read his post again slowly, and think...

 

[websurfer]

America declares war on terrorism and supplies weapons to terrorists

irony, or just stupidity?

America will just capitalize on everything...

 

[member5726]

Money, money, money... :2 cents:

 

[websurfer]

Money, money, money... :2 cents:

you got it!!

 

[georges]

Uh, Georges, remember our talk about calming down before you make a post? Read his post again slowly, and think...

did you read what he say about the us.
he means indirectly that it was a stupid country by his sentence so where is the big deal starman.