parker said:I'm not terribly impressed by tweedledum or tweedledee. :2 cents:
sorry bush is stupid when he said "good`s favorite country(america) whats with other countrys?they all nothing and wrong? that make me sick!:nono: :throwup:Brino said:President Bush's Message to the People of France Expressing Gracious Bemusement Over Their Sixth Humiliating Thrashing by an American One-Nut Wonder
http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2004/072404.asp
Funny coming from a guy who cant ride a bike.
roadrunner said:sorry bush is stupid when he said "good`s favorite country(america) whats with other countrys?they all nothing and wrong? that make me sick!:nono: :throwup:
ups:uohs: now i see the url is .org,the orignal end with .gov! sooooooooory! its erly in the morning! :glugglug:Brino said:You do know that that's not real dont you? It's a joke about how much of an ass Bush is.
georges said:bush and chesney if kerry is voted america will definitely be fucked up as it has never been. and thanks that clinton is not here anymore. The best of all was ronald r reagan better than all the democrats except fdr and jfk.evn gwb senior was better than Clinton
roadrunner said:ups:uohs: now i see the url is .org,the orignal end with .gov! sooooooooory! its erly in the morning! :glugglug:
Brino said:What about Abraham Lincoln? Was Reagen better than Lincoln? Bush Senior better than Clinton? Dont you remember the famous line "it's the econemy stupid" that's what made Clinton better than Bush Senior and Bush Junior.
georges said:For me reagan put the us at a so high level than none has before.
Clinton wasn't better than the two gwb for me, don't say victory for kerry too early, wait for the results of the votes in november and we will see.I never liked clinton.
georges said:P.s: ican't compare a president of the 19th century with a president of the 20th century
Brino said:Well you dont live in the U.S. so you dont know how bad the econemy here is/was under the two Bush's as compared to Clinton.
georges said:economy was enough fucked up when clinton was and don't tell me that it was better than being under the two gwb's because i know it is not totaaly true.There was unemployment under bush sr as well as under clinton, right? There were delocalisation of firms into asIan countries in order to reduce labour costs that has caused a lot of unemployment.Don't think it is so EASY to solve unemployment.
Brino said:It's not easy to solve unemployment your right but a step towards that goal would be job creation and job creation under Clinton was far better than the two Bush's. I refer you to Inspector_XXX's posts in the Liberal vs. Conservative Thread
georges said:i have seen that but however he didn't resolved and lowered the unemployment as reagan did.
Brino said:I thought we were talking about the Bushs' not Reagen. I dont know much about employment and job creation under Reagen maybe Inspector_XXX can help me here.
georges said:i know but despite there were more jobs during clinton i don't think that the wages were higher.