I'm sure lots of wankers on Twitter are saying that but I was more bothered by how long and boring and stupid it was.
Last edited:
What is the latest BAD film you watched?
- Thread starter PlumpRump
- Start date
Justice league ☹️
Which one?
Really can't do justice to how shit this was. The fucking shark doesn't turn up for an hour, for a start.
Not worth the hype. And like Ryan says, they just shoehorned in multiple, irrelevant cameos. Usually you can save those for the sequels , but to have them off the bat is like admitting that you KNOW this was a stinker to begin with, and you needed that star power (Spiderman/Venom) to prop it up
The Power of the Dog.
Not only was it boring and a waste of talent, it glorified passive aggressive behavior.
I understand the movie.
I don't understand people who thought it was really good.
Not only was it boring and a waste of talent, it glorified passive aggressive behavior.
I understand the movie.
I don't understand people who thought it was really good.
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
A colossal fumble of material they were handed from "WandaVision" and "What If?".
A colossal fumble of material they were handed from "WandaVision" and "What If?".
I had expiring points to use on Redbox, so I finally got around to renting "Matrix: Resurrections." WTF?? There was NO reason to make that movie.. The ending was also ridiculous, in the Neo "forgets" how to fly - even though he's been doing so since the end of the FIRST movie..
It's like in Star Wars 8, where Leia gets blown out into space - yet survives; even though she received no "force" training (at least, that is shown to the audience)..
It's like in Star Wars 8, where Leia gets blown out into space - yet survives; even though she received no "force" training (at least, that is shown to the audience)..
Spitfire over Berlin
I generally have a very low standard for war movies. The plot can be paper thin if there battle scenes and effects are good.
This POS has CG that looks like it came from 1990's video game. At best, it looks like a plastic toy model - which probably would have looked better.
And the story/acting was crap, with 90%+ of the movie consisting of pilots talking to each other in the cockpit shot throughout the movie.
I generally have a very low standard for war movies. The plot can be paper thin if there battle scenes and effects are good.
This POS has CG that looks like it came from 1990's video game. At best, it looks like a plastic toy model - which probably would have looked better.
And the story/acting was crap, with 90%+ of the movie consisting of pilots talking to each other in the cockpit shot throughout the movie.
Worst sequel since Star Wars Episode IX - Rise of Skywalker
I thought it was good for what it was - believable dinosaurs and the merging of the original trilogy cast.
I thought the CG and 3D were really well done - which you'd expect from a film like this.
The underwater scene looked absolutely amazing in 3D:
The story on the other hand, meh. The one thing that bugged me was "the hand" :
I get that it was a thing from the previous movies, but you try that with any wild animal and you'll be joining the Anakin Skywalker amputee club.
The Gray Man. The action scene in Prague, with the red Audi - was it me, or did the EV all of a sudden become an ICE vehicle mid-way through the scene?? Horrible editing. Also: the action scene at the end, attaching the castle - the most unrealistic attack scene since Arnold S. stormed the island in "Commando," running across a field with 8-plus guys firing fully automatic assault rifles at him, and they ALL miss..
This was so bad I wasn't sure if this was a high school student's project. The acting is beyond campy, it looks like it was shot on an iphone, the lighting is just off the wall from shot to shot.
And worst, for a movie with "Kung Fu" in its name, the actual fights were cut so badly it was clear no one had any fight/stunt training at all.
Similar threads
