GregCentauro
Banned
It all comes down to the simple fact: The majority of people are fuckheads.
Mariah, someone might have mentioned this already, but we need to consider the fact that a lot of votes come from people who do not frequent the board at all. A good portion of votes come from individuals that don't even know what 'OCSM' means/represents.
^^ Edit - this was indeed mentioned already, but I'd still like to reinforce the point.
Perhaps next year the OCSM category could be limited to the ladies that contribute (e.g. Mariah Milano, Spexy Ashleigh, Play With Alisa, etc.), and when I say 'contribute' I don't mean log in once in awhile to advertise. :uohs:
It all comes down to the simple fact: The majority of people are fuckheads.
Would be counter to what FOs is trying to do which is grow the participation and interaction on their site. It seems for the most part they have the criteria somewhat down...they are investing at least $30k of their money and based on the fact that the prize money and participation has doubled for the contest in one year...makes it seem like these people know what they're doing.:dunno:
So they have a girl or two where they may not really belong..so there are voters who have simple or complicated methods of deciding who they vote for..nature of the beast.
Most people vote for who they like and they like them usually because the person does what they do well. Doesn't matter if it's s/c or h/c.
"You know (FOs members) "a bunch of bitchy, little girls..".:hatsoff:
I disagree. IMO, the Best OCSM category should be limited to (at least) semi-active board participants. :2 cents:
Lemme give you an example. 2010 Miss FOs...when the contest was announced I believe Miss Hybrid had just joined or become active or something like that.
But when she did she quickly became one of the most interesting, if not somewhat influential OCSMs in the contest.
Should she have been prevented from competing in the OCSM category if it existed then?
Further, why wouldn't that potentially discourage some OCSMs from board participation if they knew they couldn't be considered for category weighted on something like board participation? Again...that approach would seem to be counterproductive to some of what I believe FOs goals are.
lol I'm ok I promise. But someone fucked with the wrong girl last night.
I don't get why Nina Starr (I love this girl) is up for Best Euro Babe? And yeah like you I have no idea why some girls are in the categories they are in. Someone didn't think this through too well. :o
And yeah I hate people that just vote for their favorites even though they don't deserve it in certain categories! :crash:
The cam girl category is a good example! Don't vote for your fave pornstar there! Vote for real cam girls!
I vote for Jane and Spexy there! :lovecoupl
I agree with alot of the points that you made but sadly, nothing is going to change. The real winners for best OCSM (and Ms. Freeones as well) should be SpexyAshleigh or Play With Alisa, they have both contributed so much to this forum and until just a few weeks ago, SpexyAshleigh wasn't even an OCSM she was just a regular member like the rest of us, they truly are the Misses Freeones along with other OCSMs like yourself and Viorotica, Chica, Ms Hybrid, etc.. You had my vote before on the Ms. Freeones Contest and you've earned my respect for addressing this. Maybe the admins will listen to you.
Not necessarily, but potentially. Miss H. would have qualified for the newcomer category and the Miss FreeOnes category last year, assuming the she hadn't been contributing at that time.
... how would it discourage board participation? It would undoubtedly encourage participation. (?)
What are FO's goals? I'd say one is to attract adult stars, which the Miss FreeOnes contest is doing. I don't see how limiting one voting category based on board participation would have a negative impact. If a star wanted to be considered for Best OCSM, all she would need to do is post ... it's that simple.
Lastly HM, I draw your attention to the fact that a very famous adult star initiated this discussion, and has expressed her own opinion re. the 'Best OCSM' category, where she questions the fact that a very active OCSM is trailing in this category vs. a relatively inactive OCSM. Reading through this thread, I don't see any other OCSM's challenging or disagreeing!
The problem with the OCSM vote is that people who don't know a thing about the board can vote for someone. It's just another place to vote for their favourite girl to them. Of course a girl like Play with Alisa or JaneB deserve to win that one, and anyone who says something different really doesn't know a thing about the board.
Though I was a long time peruser of FO's and a porn nut I'm a newbie to the boards and threads.,, With us guys its usually our third leg that does the driving and what little thinking we actually do, I have been paying attention to the posts -(not just the pics) - and I've been delighted and turned on how smart and quick you ladies are. That's why I have began to vote for the likes of Jane Burgess, Play with Alisa and Tia Ling- to name a few. About the Cams- I'm not a user, but I will rethink them Mariah.
How are they the real winners? A lot of us have been on here a lot longer and don't just post when there is a contest. People like you should not be allowed to vote. You have no idea what you are talking about. :eek:
Lemme give you an example. 2010 Miss FOs...when the contest was announced I believe Miss Hybrid had just joined or become active or something like that.
But when she did she quickly became one of the most interesting, if not somewhat influential OCSMs in the contest.
Should she have been prevented from competing in the OCSM category if it existed then?
Not trying to be a dick here, but yes, she should have been. There is no way to predict how active someone WILL become....don't get me wrong, she's cool as hell, and it's awesome how active she has become around here, but I do agree with the idea that there should be a pre-requisite for the category.
Not trying to be a dick here, but yes, she should have been. There is no way to predict how active someone WILL become....don't get me wrong, she's cool as hell, and it's awesome how active she has become around here, but I do agree with the idea that there should be a pre-requisite for the category.
One thing I noticed is that categories seem useless : The top 3 is the same in every category they possibly compete all 3 :
Got Gisele
Vicky Vette
Sophie Dee
People just vote for they favorite girls in every category they're in...