The Official Obamacare Poll

Big brother is watching you.........make the right choice.

  • Yes

    Votes: 45 56.3%
  • No

    Votes: 28 35.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 7 8.8%

  • Total voters
    80
Uber Liberal?
Just off the top of my head the following are all conservatives

You
Georges
Johnnystyro
Gunslingingbird
Facetious
Will E Worm
Jane B
Sparky Shortz
Bree Olsen
Bloodshot Scott
Philbert
Blue Countach
Meesterperfect
Sporty Carr
Crazy4thebrat
Andronicus Ry
Hedonis
jasonK282
ninetysixcavy
MILF Man
Red Spyder
Legzman (mostly)

Beyond those [and I'm sure I forgot a few] it seems like Whimsy, Cunning Stunts, JacknCoke and possibly Jod lean more towards being conservative than liberal. That's a lot of conservative voices among the frequent chat section posters.

You can add me, I suppose. Just because I hate Beck, Palin, Hannity and Bush, I'm by no means a Liberal. I just don't like idiots.

I wonder if Chica's on that list. Her gun and suppressor collection make me think it's a possibility. ;)

How was I not included in that list :(

Good old fashioned racism, that's how.

Sorry, wrong thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good old fashioned racism, that's how.

Sorry, wrong thread.

Fucking racism!!! I hear Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are professionals when it comes to defending people from racism! They will defend my honor!
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
I often get a chuckle out of people when they say they're a "conservative", but then when you ask them what type of conservative they are, they give you a sort of blank stare. I'm a curious sort of person. So when someone wants to label themselves (or others), I wonder whether they mean they're social conservatives, fiscal conservatives... or both.

Personally, I don't think it passes the giggle test to call yourself a "fiscal conservative" if you were in favor of dumping borrowed Chinese money into a place like Iraq (around a trillion dollars now, I believe) over bascially nothing. And if you make your money by fucking for money or showing your goodies on the internet, you'd have a harder time than I would of being accepted into the Thomas Road Baptist Church. Kinda throws that "social conservative" label out the wondow too, huh? Kind of like my lil pal Will E Worm... you're on a porn board, dude! How are you supposed to be a Man of The Word if you're hanging out here with us pervs?! Come on now! :nono:

It's like that holy roller guy that I used to work with. He'd go on & on about how he was opposed to homosexuality. But his collection of carpet munching teen babes was a helluva lot bigger than mine.

Not all of the time, but much of the time, I believe people reach for labels just because they think it sounds cool. :dunno:

Over the course of my life I've probably voted for more Republicans than I have Democrats. But after 1992, I knew that I'd probably never again identify myself as a member of ANY major party. I've owned my own business since I was in my early 20's and I know what it's like to have to meet a payroll and to deal with unexpected expenses. But I also know what it's like to get dicked over by a big bank... just because they played by a different set of rules than I had to. And I know what it's like to see most of the manufacturing businesses in my local area heading off to Mexico and Asia... just because a bunch of Democrats and the majority of Republicans in the 90's time sold out the American people on some sham free (unfair) trade agreements. Through my father, I knew Chuck Robb and I liked him. At one time I had a lot of respect for him. He was a (fiscally) conservative Democrat, who could have been President if he'd played his cards right... stayed away from cocaine and whores. Whereas I've never had any use for Diane Feinstein. But Chuck voted for NAFTA and Diane voted against it. On that issue, I'd be in Di's camp. If that makes me an uber liberal, then so be it. I'd rather be called a liberal, who was right, than be called a conservative, who was wrong.

Like I said in another thread, I do have some concerns about this legislation. But if the GOPers want to run on a platform of repeal, and that means that insurance companies can go back to dicking people over on rates, shitting on anyone who has a pre-existing condition and dropping someone at the very time that they need coverage... then fuck the GOP and the three legged horse they rode in on. :thefinger
 
It is criminal to go bankrupt because of health-related reasons. It's that simple. Obamacare is a good first step, but Globalization will force America toward a true single-payer Medicare-for-all system within 10 years.

I don't even know why Health Insurance companies exist. A hospital seems like the proper place to go to for care and paying for that care. A Health Insurer is just another useless middleman who offers nothing and takes a giant share of the pie.

A for-profit model of healthcare converts citizens into walking check books. That is wrong. Healthcare should be a guarenteed, gov't provided right which we all pay for. :thumbsup: That's the only way to actually keep "costs" in check.
 
Like I said in another thread, I do have some concerns about this legislation. But if the GOPers want to run on a platform of repeal, and that means that insurance companies can go back to dicking people over on rates, shitting on anyone who has a pre-existing condition and dropping someone at the very time that they need coverage... then fuck the GOP and the three legged horse they rode in on. :thefinger

The repeal talk is simply to keep the ire over the bill up. Even if the GOP got 2/3rds of both houses, Obama still has the veto.

But, eventhough it's all pie in the sky, and they know it first and foremost, the alleged repeal would involve passing individual measures like preexisting conditions.

It's funny to see both sides arguing about this. Unless the courts get involved and find aspects of this bill to be unconstitutional, it's not going anywhere. Why are people pretending otherwise?
 
It is criminal to go bankrupt because of health-related reasons. It's that simple. Obamacare is a good first step, but Globalization will force America toward a true single-payer Medicare-for-all system within 10 years.

I don't even know why Health Insurance companies exist. A hospital seems like the proper place to go to for care and paying for that care. A Health Insurer is just another useless middleman who offers nothing and takes a giant share of the pie.

A for-profit model of healthcare converts citizens into walking check books. That is wrong. Healthcare should be a guarenteed, gov't provided right which we all pay for. :thumbsup: That's the only way to actually keep "costs" in check.

By globalization, you're referring to the fact that many of the remaining American corporations will set up shop across the border to avoid having to offer all employees healthcare benefits?

In that sense, you're right. We will have a single-payer system because nobody will have jobs and everybody will be on MedicAid and the single payer will be China.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
I have a Roman dagger (replica) that I paid over $600 for. Michele Bachmann said words to the effect that she would slash her wrists if healthcare reform passed. I'm prepared to offer her that dagger and hold that dizzy bitch to her word. Other than the pugio that laid the final blow to Julius Caesar, I would prize the one that had Bachmann's blood on it above all others.
 
Or, foreign companies from countries like China will set up health clinics here, using their doctors and their medications....and it truly will be "buyer beware" :eek:

Michelle Bachman exemplifies what the GOP has been reduced to. Theatrical hyperbole simply to ~enrage~ the base in the hope that an ~enraged, uninformed base~ will turn out to vote in greater numbers than the incumbent democratic base. :dunno:

The GOP's theatrical, hysterical rage masks the fact that they still don't have any actual oppositional ideas. You can't get elected when you offer nothing but rage. The Democratic base will turn out just to smack down the hooligan GOP Fox Noise viewer....

Some GOP Congressmen admitted the truth this week: They serve Fox News. End of story.
 
Or, foreign companies from countries like China will set up health clinics here, using their doctors and their medications....and it truly will be "buyer beware" :eek:

Michelle Bachman exemplifies what the GOP has been reduced to. Theatrical hyperbole simply to ~enrage~ the base in the hope that an ~enraged, uninformed base~ will turn out to vote in greater numbers than the incumbent democratic base. :dunno:

The GOP's theatrical, hysterical rage masks the fact that they still don't have any actual oppositional ideas. You can't get elected when you offer nothing but rage. The Democratic base will turn out just to smack down the hooligan GOP Fox Noise viewer....

Some GOP Congressmen admitted the truth this week: They serve Fox News. End of story.

It wasn't a GOP Congressman, it was Bush speechwriter, David Frum. And Frum hasn't exactly been liked by the GOP.

Anyway, I don't think Bachman represents the GOP. It's a weird time right now...you have people like Marco Rubio and Rand Paul soaring in the polls. I'd hardly liken Rand Paul to an idiot like Bachman.

The territory's really being carved up. There's the Bachman/Palin idiot camp, the expanding Libertarian camp, the Romney insider camp...it's a clusterfuck.

For the first time in 16 years, the Democrats have both houses and the White House and they stand as unified as ever, but are still expected to loose the House of Representatives because people want anything other than what they have now. Politics is an interesting, fickle thing.
 
It wasn't a GOP Congressman, it was Bush speechwriter, David Frum. And Frum hasn't exactly been liked by the GOP.

Anyway, I don't think Bachman represents the GOP. It's a weird time right now...you have people like Marco Rubio and Rand Paul soaring in the polls. I'd hardly liken Rand Paul to an idiot like Bachman.

The territory's really being carved up. There's the Bachman/Palin idiot camp, the expanding Libertarian camp, the Romney insider camp...it's a clusterfuck.

For the first time in 16 years, the Democrats have both houses and the White House and they stand as unified as ever, but are still expected to loose the House of Representatives because people want anything other than what they have now. Politics is an interesting, fickle thing.

Ain't that the truth. I mean, I've always considered myself at least moderately conservative, but I can't even make sense of what some of these talking heads on Fox News are saying. And yet, at the same time, I'm more vehemently opposed to the Democratic party than I have ever been before.

We really, really need to ditch the two party system in America. I keep thinking about how much better all this healthcare reform would have gone if it had been 5 or 6 parties aligning along the two sides in coalitions, instead of two parties perfectly dividing along party lines.
 
Ain't that the truth. I mean, I've always considered myself at least moderately conservative, but I can't even make sense of what some of these talking heads on Fox News are saying. And yet, at the same time, I'm more vehemently opposed to the Democratic party than I have ever been before.

We really, really need to ditch the two party system in America. I keep thinking about how much better all this healthcare reform would have gone if it had been 5 or 6 parties aligning along the two sides in coalitions, instead of two parties perfectly dividing along party lines.

You know, it might be wishful thinking...hell, I'm sure it is, but it does look like things are getting divisive enough that maybe this two-party system is coming undone.

Not to bring up the Pauls again, but everybody calls Ron Paul's popularity some fad or a product of the Libertarian fringe screaming the loudest, but it's likely that Rand Paul, a political newcomer who mirrors his father's political philosophy, will be the next Kentucky Senator.

I think the anti-war, anti-Imperialism and anti-big government rooting is really starting to take off and the polls show that these figure-head talking point machines are finally starting to lose favor as people begin to was up and see through them.

But then again, it's probably just wishful thinking. The political climate seems to be as unstable and unpredictable as the wind lately.
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
Clearly the poll here is not indicative of the opinions that most Americans hold. According to Rasmussen, 54% of Americans are opposed to Vladamir's health care plan (41% approve). That's not going to stop Congress from passing it though. That's fine. After the midterm elections, they won't have their majority anymore.
 
It seems that I should update my friends list.
:D

Uber Liberal?
Just off the top of my head the following are all conservatives

You
Georges
Johnnystyro
Gunslingingbird
Facetious
Will E Worm
Jane B
Sparky Shortz
Bree Olsen
Bloodshot Scott
Philbert
Blue Countach
Meesterperfect
Sporty Carr
Crazy4thebrat
Andronicus Ry
Hedonis
jasonK282
ninetysixcavy
MILF Man
Red Spyder
Legzman (mostly)

Beyond those [and I'm sure I forgot a few] it seems like Whimsy, Cunning Stunts, JacknCoke and possibly Jod lean more towards being conservative than liberal. That's a lot of conservative voices among the frequent chat section posters.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
A USA Today/Gallup poll, taken the day after health reform passed in the House Sunday night, that showed respondents calling passage a "good thing" by a 49% to 40% margin. Rasmussen has reported 41% in favor of the legislation and 54% opposed, with 55% supporting its repeal.

That's a fairly wide discrepancy, as is common between Rasmussen and Gallup. As more polling firms release surveys conducted after Sunday's vote, we'll get a clearer picture of opinion and enthusiasm.

Both Parties Think They'll Benefit from Health Care This Fall
 
Clearly the poll here is not indicative of the opinions that most Americans hold. According to Rasmussen, 54% of Americans are opposed to Vladamir's health care plan (41% approve). That's not going to stop Congress from passing it though. That's fine. After the midterm elections, they won't have their majority anymore.

Yeah, we need to take into account that many people here are European, Canadian or come from other places that have socialized healthcare.

I'm sure a 2nd Amendment or hate speech poll would yield similar results.
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
its bullshit that insurance companies drop families because of pre-existing conditions and because people get certain diseases that insurance companies don't want to pay for (cancer). If I put a ton of money into an insurance company and the one time I need them they cut me off, that's bull, at least this bill protects the public from the all too powerful insurance companies that fuck its clients whenever something goes wrong. The insurance companies fuck the taxpayers just as much as the government
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Yeah, that must be why not a single Republican voted in favor of the legislation. :rolleyes: Oh, I see, they're showing their support through dissidence. What a clever strategy. The only way Republicans will benefit from this health care bill is when they replace the Democrats in office who supported it.

^___^ That seems to be the reason that (some) Republicans feel that they will benefit.

Neither the article nor I said anything about Republicans supporting the legislation.
 

Facetious

Moderated
Nº !

Particularly after finding that the president has included funding for his brown shirt army in the bill :


HC includes Reserve Corps
SEC. 430. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.

Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows:


SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.-

(1) IN GENERAL.-There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency.

(2) REQUIREMENT.-All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended.

(3) APPOINTMENT.-Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(4) ACTIVE DUTY.-Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training.

(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.-Warrant officers may be appointed to the Service for the purpose of providing support to the health and delivery systems maintained by the Service and any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be considered for purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code, to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corps of the Service.

(cool.gif ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULAR CORPS.-Effective on the date of enactment of the Affordable Health Choices Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.

© PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESERVE.-

(1) PURPOSE.-The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service's reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions.

(2) USES.-The Ready Reserve Corps shall-

(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;

(cool.gif be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;

© be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and

(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved communities (as defined in section 399SS) to improve access to health services.

(d) FUNDING.-For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to the Office of the Surgeon General for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014. Funds appropriated under this subsection shall be used for recruitment and training of Commissioned Corps Officers.*

I know . . I know, rest assured . . . everything is going to be OK, just let obama employ anything and everything he wants and then if you don't like it . . . ha ! you're shit up a creek !

I don't know how you guys interpreted this, but, let's not get ahead of ourselves, what in the hell is this doing in our health care reform bill ? :spin: that's how ! :flame:

Aside : Going through some of my files, I couldn't help myself from pulling out some of my medical insurance statements from the past -

Personal Full Medical Coverage
02 / 01 / 03 - $132.00 2 months coverage
02 / 01 / 04 - $184.00 2 months coverage
06 / 01 / 05 - $300.00 2 months coverage
Up up up up up and now it's become unaffordable.

Would anybody care to explain precisely what had caused this spike in health care costs ? I'll reserve my analysis for later . . maybe. ;)
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
I realize this forum is liberal, but even you guys should understand how Obamacare is unconstitutional. If the government isn't going to abide by the Constitution, perhaps we should just throw it away. :dunno:[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't say this forum is liberal by any stretch....at least not as it relates to those who dominate the "talk" forum. Pretty well even as far as I can tell. Lots of voices from the left, right and in between.

As far as the constitutionality issue is concerned....exactly what article or amendment does the health care law violate?
 
Top