The Donald J Trump: SHITSHOW IN A DUMPSTER FIRE Thread
- Thread starter xfire
- Start date
- Status
Were those names intended to impress? lol
"I want you to hear me tonight, I am not saying that President Obama is the Antichrist, I am not saying that at all. One reason I know he's not the Antichrist is the Antichrist is going to have much higher poll numbers when he comes. President Obama is not the Antichrist. But what I am saying is this: the course he is choosing to lead our nation is paving the way for the future reign of the Antichrist." - Robert Jeffress - who has also condemned all Jews, Muslims, Mormans and Hindus to hell and has referred to Roman Catholocism as "satanic".
These people are all politicized posturers, advantage-taking charlatans and/or nutballs as is Trump's closest "spiritual adviser" Paula White, a close associate of that great beacon of integrity and morality Jim Bakker.
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Pretty much 100% of the, "Christian" leaders in this country are nothing more than political operatives and religious hacks, fuck those Ungodly cunts; dumb, immoral, and criminal.
Christians believe:
There will be a rapture.
There will be a 7 year tribulation period.
There will be an Antichrist.
Jefress is an ordained Protestant minister and that is his interpretation of the Bible.
And yes the Bible states that people will go to hell that don’t accept Christ.
lol @ a Reform Jew atheist interpreting the Bible.
My post wasn’t quoted. Nice ignore feature that you have going there. :1orglaugh
James Merikangas is well known in the D.C. Bethesda Maryland area. He is a staunch advocate of abolishing the death penalty and other liberal causes: I am certain that the other physicians in that hit piece have a similar liberal odor.
trumpa loompa debate 101:
A doctor who is against the death penalty??? Well his opinion is obviously worthless. And of course any fact or opinion contained in the same segment must be equally worthless. I have just debunked the arguments of all of these experts in their fields and in doing so avoided having to provide any kind of meaningful response. Checkmate! MAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey Obamatang!
It’s called establishing credibility and this physician is a liberal and obviously has a bias against Trump. He also as with the other “ experts” has not diagnosed the president personally. Something that is obvious to everyone that you are in dire need of.
Oh dang! I dun bin schooled! Guess I better go and consult trump's spiritual advisers about establishing credibility...
Well, you’ve certainly been schooled on the fact that no credible diagnosis can be made by a physician without examing the patient directly. And credibility and bias of a witness is certainly a legitimate consideration. But yeah what a SHITSHOW Trump is. Oi Oi Oi!!
Trump Inauguration Spending Under Criminal Investigation by Federal Prosecutors
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...estigation-by-federal-prosecutors-11544736455
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...estigation-by-federal-prosecutors-11544736455
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Poor guy, came close to doing 20 years in the big house. He wasn’t a particularly smart lawyer. Sorry Trump, but he doesn’t qualify as “ the best people”.
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Sophistry.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...674/kevin-mccarthy-house-trump-investigations
GOP leader who gloated about Benghazi probe wants Dems to refrain from investigating Trump
Kevin McCarthy is singing a very different tune about congressional investigations than he did during the Obama years.
Soon-to-be House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) staked out a new position on congressional investigations in an interview with Fox News on Monday. Unlike his years leading the charge on Benghazi, McCarthy now thinks that Democrats should drop their subpoena power when it comes to President Donald Trump.
“It looks like what [Democrats will] focus on is just more investigations. I think American is too great of a nation to have such a small agenda,” McCarthy said. “I think there are other problems out there that we really should be focused upon. And my belief is, let’s see where we can work together — let’s move America forward.”
“We have investigated this for a long period of time,” he added. “Both sides have come up with nothing in the process. I think we should put the American people first.”
While it’s true that House Republicans’ investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election didn’t turn up any evidence of collusion, there are indications that was primarily due to the partisan motivations of the lawmakers who ran the investigation.
Devin Nunes, the outgoing House Intelligence Committee chair, worked hand-in-hand with the White House to politicize intelligence reports, and was even caught on tape admitting that his overriding motivation is to protect Trump.
During a Fox News interview in March, Nunes attempted to justify abruptly ending his committee’s investigation using a talking point that had been debunked eight months earlier — that the Trump Tower meeting was primarily about Russian adoptions.
McCarthy’s misleading comments are an early sign of how he plans to lead his conference through the coming onslaught of Democratic investigations. The man who once wanted to endlessly investigate Hillary Clinton doesn’t feel the same when it’s his own party in the White House.
Politically motivated investigations for me, not for thee
During a moment of accidental candor in 2015, McCarthy admitted during an interview on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that House Republicans’ seemingly unending investigation of Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi attack was about hurting her poll numbers.
Here’s what McCarthy said:
What you’re going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?
But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen.
While McCarthy had no problem with a transparently politicized investigation of a Democrat with presidential aspirations three years ago, he’s now urging the incoming House majority to lay off the president because investigating him would be divisive.
In private, McCarthy himself has alluded to one of the reasons an investigation of Trump is warranted. During a secretly recorded June 2016 conversation with GOP leaders, McCarthy infamously said, “There’s two people I think Putin pays: [Rep. Dana] Rohrabacher and Trump.”
House Intelligence Committee member Eric Swalwell (D-CA) indicated on Twitter he was not persuaded by the case McCarthy made urging his caucus to lay off the president.
Defending Trump by downplaying and deflecting
Ironically, the first part of McCarthy’s interview on Fox News on Monday was about former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to the House Intelligence Committee on Friday. House Republicans forced Comey to testify as part of a last-ditch effort to gin up a baseless conspiracy theory about how the ongoing criminal investigation of the Trump campaign is rooted in anti-Trump bias among the bureau’s senior leadership.
At another point during the interview, McCarthy tried to downplay Trump’s false statements denying that his campaign was in contact with Russians.
“If you’re in an international city, people interact with a lot of individuals,” McCarthy said — his implication being that meeting with Kremlin-connected Russians offering dirt on your political opponents while your business is secretly pursuing real estate opportunities in Moscow really isn’t that out of the norm.
Later, McCarthy dismissed federal prosecutors directly implicating Trump in crimes committed by his longtime attorney, Michael Cohen.
“What it shows is that if the president hires an attorney to solve a problem, he expects them to do it in legal manner,” McCarthy said. “If [incoming Intelligence Committee chair Adam] Schiff is taking this beyond to go forward and say there is an impeachable offense because of a campaign finance problem, there’s a lot of members of Congress who are doing to have to leave.”
In fact, no currently serving members of Congress have been accused of funneling illegal payments to women to hush up extramarital affairs.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...674/kevin-mccarthy-house-trump-investigations
GOP leader who gloated about Benghazi probe wants Dems to refrain from investigating Trump
Kevin McCarthy is singing a very different tune about congressional investigations than he did during the Obama years.
Soon-to-be House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) staked out a new position on congressional investigations in an interview with Fox News on Monday. Unlike his years leading the charge on Benghazi, McCarthy now thinks that Democrats should drop their subpoena power when it comes to President Donald Trump.
“It looks like what [Democrats will] focus on is just more investigations. I think American is too great of a nation to have such a small agenda,” McCarthy said. “I think there are other problems out there that we really should be focused upon. And my belief is, let’s see where we can work together — let’s move America forward.”
“We have investigated this for a long period of time,” he added. “Both sides have come up with nothing in the process. I think we should put the American people first.”
While it’s true that House Republicans’ investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election didn’t turn up any evidence of collusion, there are indications that was primarily due to the partisan motivations of the lawmakers who ran the investigation.
Devin Nunes, the outgoing House Intelligence Committee chair, worked hand-in-hand with the White House to politicize intelligence reports, and was even caught on tape admitting that his overriding motivation is to protect Trump.
During a Fox News interview in March, Nunes attempted to justify abruptly ending his committee’s investigation using a talking point that had been debunked eight months earlier — that the Trump Tower meeting was primarily about Russian adoptions.
McCarthy’s misleading comments are an early sign of how he plans to lead his conference through the coming onslaught of Democratic investigations. The man who once wanted to endlessly investigate Hillary Clinton doesn’t feel the same when it’s his own party in the White House.
Politically motivated investigations for me, not for thee
During a moment of accidental candor in 2015, McCarthy admitted during an interview on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that House Republicans’ seemingly unending investigation of Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi attack was about hurting her poll numbers.
Here’s what McCarthy said:
What you’re going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?
But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen.
While McCarthy had no problem with a transparently politicized investigation of a Democrat with presidential aspirations three years ago, he’s now urging the incoming House majority to lay off the president because investigating him would be divisive.
In private, McCarthy himself has alluded to one of the reasons an investigation of Trump is warranted. During a secretly recorded June 2016 conversation with GOP leaders, McCarthy infamously said, “There’s two people I think Putin pays: [Rep. Dana] Rohrabacher and Trump.”
House Intelligence Committee member Eric Swalwell (D-CA) indicated on Twitter he was not persuaded by the case McCarthy made urging his caucus to lay off the president.
Defending Trump by downplaying and deflecting
Ironically, the first part of McCarthy’s interview on Fox News on Monday was about former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to the House Intelligence Committee on Friday. House Republicans forced Comey to testify as part of a last-ditch effort to gin up a baseless conspiracy theory about how the ongoing criminal investigation of the Trump campaign is rooted in anti-Trump bias among the bureau’s senior leadership.
At another point during the interview, McCarthy tried to downplay Trump’s false statements denying that his campaign was in contact with Russians.
“If you’re in an international city, people interact with a lot of individuals,” McCarthy said — his implication being that meeting with Kremlin-connected Russians offering dirt on your political opponents while your business is secretly pursuing real estate opportunities in Moscow really isn’t that out of the norm.
Later, McCarthy dismissed federal prosecutors directly implicating Trump in crimes committed by his longtime attorney, Michael Cohen.
“What it shows is that if the president hires an attorney to solve a problem, he expects them to do it in legal manner,” McCarthy said. “If [incoming Intelligence Committee chair Adam] Schiff is taking this beyond to go forward and say there is an impeachable offense because of a campaign finance problem, there’s a lot of members of Congress who are doing to have to leave.”
In fact, no currently serving members of Congress have been accused of funneling illegal payments to women to hush up extramarital affairs.
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
trump's "Urban Council" is a scam to give tax breaks to real estate developers. trump, the kushners, and richard lefrak all own properties in "opportunity zones," which makes them eligible for big tax breaks on their real estate developments. The kushners actually bought 13 million dollars worth of property in Long Branch right after it was declared an opportunity zone in April.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...lly-benefit-federal-opportunity-zones-n946821
This is such an obvious scam that trump himself isn't even talking it up - Unlike most events featuring Trump at the White House, it was not broadcast on cable news networks, C-SPAN, or on the White House's website.
The program will be headed by zippy ben carson, but actual reporting requirements are still up in the air. They haven't really decided what kind of paper trail will be required to give dumpster fire and his buddies even bigger tax breaks while calling it a gift to the little people.
And America just keeps grabbing it's ankles and backing up for more...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...lly-benefit-federal-opportunity-zones-n946821
This is such an obvious scam that trump himself isn't even talking it up - Unlike most events featuring Trump at the White House, it was not broadcast on cable news networks, C-SPAN, or on the White House's website.
The program will be headed by zippy ben carson, but actual reporting requirements are still up in the air. They haven't really decided what kind of paper trail will be required to give dumpster fire and his buddies even bigger tax breaks while calling it a gift to the little people.
And America just keeps grabbing it's ankles and backing up for more...
No we grabbed our ankles in 2008 and 2012.
Ah yes, if it helps minorities then there has to be old rich fat cats lighting their cigars with 100 dollar bills and being chauffeured in Bentleys behind it because they are making millions off of the poor stupid black people.
I guess Bob Johnson the founder of BET ( who voted for Hillary btw) supports this enthusiastically because he’s just a greedy ’Uncle Tom.
Wanna see a real scam against minorities?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sou...aw1m7gatYGw6iDmsmweVsQLl&ust=1544965238717699
Good ole Chicago, that’s right.
Nice try at sliding a racial slur by in regard to Ben Carson. You really are the scummiest of the liberal scum.
This country probably had to take an extra shower every day you lived here.
- Status
