The Blindness of Religious People

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just read that Paula Deen said on the today show this morning that she is sure that god will get her through all of this mess. that he has his plans for her and that she knows he will work it out LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!! lets see how that works out for her

Why the Fuck did god let her get in a fuckin mess in the first place??????? (and now he'll get her through it LMFAO!!)
 
With a religious majority, so many people seem to forget that this is not a theocracy so they let alot of religious institutions, get away with alot of shit. Not sure what an "atheist monument" is but I'm certainly fine with a secular monument. Something that represents the country and not it's most popular fairy tale.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
I just watched a segment on Justice Scalia's response to the DOMA ruling. What a fucking lunatic he is. The fact he was appointed to the supreme court just proves that Reagan wasn't nearly as moderate as people seem to think.

And BC he stated very clearly 10 years ago yesterday that if this decision would be defeated then there would be no way to stop gay marriage from becoming law imminently. So you can say that there's a lot left and that DOMA means very little, but now that the federal government recognizes gay marriage it will be nearly impossible for all states not to follow very shortly. You cannot be married in certain states but not have your marriage not recognized in others, especially now that the federal government recognizes it! all it will take is for a gay couple to sue in those remaining states of bigots to sue for equality based on this finding, and they'll win. You know it.

here's what he wrote 10 years ago: “Countless judicial decisions and legislative enactments,” he wrote, “have relied on the ancient proposition that a governing majority's belief that certain sexual behavior is ‘immoral and unacceptable’ constitutes a rational basis for regulation.” A long string of state laws, he argued, are “sustainable only in light of” the court’s “validation of laws based on moral choices,” including bans on incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, public indecency and selling sex toys."

Woo hoo! here come the perverts!
 
I just watched a segment on Justice Scalia's response to the DOMA ruling. What a fucking lunatic he is. The fact he was appointed to the supreme court just proves that Reagan wasn't nearly as moderate as people seem to think.

And BC he stated very clearly 10 years ago yesterday that if this decision would be defeated then there would be no way to stop gay marriage from becoming law imminently. So you can say that there's a lot left and that DOMA means very little, but now that the federal government recognizes gay marriage it will be nearly impossible for all states not to follow very shortly. You cannot be married in certain states but not have your marriage not recognized in others, especially now that the federal government recognizes it! all it will take is for a gay couple to sue in those remaining states of bigots to sue for equality based on this finding, and they'll win. You know it.

here's what he wrote 10 years ago: “Countless judicial decisions and legislative enactments,” he wrote, “have relied on the ancient proposition that a governing majority's belief that certain sexual behavior is ‘immoral and unacceptable’ constitutes a rational basis for regulation.” A long string of state laws, he argued, are “sustainable only in light of” the court’s “validation of laws based on moral choices,” including bans on incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, public indecency and selling sex toys."

Woo hoo! here come the perverts!

Quite frankly you're an idiot. You have spent the past few hours researching your response and thinking you're loaded for bear when you didn't have a response within minutes. This isn't the first time that you become befuddled only to try and find the answer you are looking for on one of your favorite liberal sites.

Let me explain this to you and I will try and go slow so you can comprehend.

The ruling means that the federal government will give equal protection under the law in states that recognize same sex marriage.

If a gay couple marries in a state that recognizes same sex marriage and one passes away then the surviving "spouse" will be able to collect survivor benefits.

But if they reside in a state that doesn't recognize same sex marriage and were not previously married in a state that did, no protection or benefits.

This was not a ruling on the constitutionality of same sex marriages pure and simple. Will this open the door for other challenges? Perhaps but that was coming anyway.

The best thing you can do is for all of you that support same sex marriage is to settle on the states that are best suited to your perversion and create several little Gaysylvanias and can live in peace , Vaseline and Barbara Streisand records happily ever after.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
I haven't researched anything. I got up a little over an hour ago and took my dogs for a walk. I just got in and turned on Fox news. I know about the state to state differences. What they were discussing was that all it's going to take is a gay couple to move to a state like Utah and then Utah will not recognize their marriage, so they will sue and every one of the pundits said that they would win the suit. They cited Scalia's rebuttal from 10 years ago and said that what he had written will come back to bight him because of today's ruling. This was Fox news, not some liberal website. Good try though.

so how exactly am I an idiot for what I said? Believe it or not the only time I'm on this site or any site is when I'm busy editing videos. While they render I come here. I shot new videos last night so I was transferring files and commented on the news report I had just watched. This morning I am importing videos into my editor so it's ready to go later when I start working on them. I'm going out of town for 2 weeks next weekend and have been shooting extra so I am ahead and can take the time off.

The last thing I do is sit and research and worry about this site.
 
How you got away with another thread that was basically baiting and bashing Christians I'll never know. Because this thread is no different than the one Petra locked. You have no problem insulting anyone that disagrees with you.

Anyway, I am going on vacation for a few days tomorrow and will not have the pleasure of reading your musings.

On a personal note, my nephew is a chef trained at Johnson and Wales he saw your video the other day and told me to tell you to stop touching your hair so much when you are preparing food.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
I just read your last sentence again and realize what a homophobic bigot you are. And a clueless one at that. Did you know that more than 60% of gay men don't have anal sex? so the vaseline comment was off-target. Barbara Streisand has an amazing voice.

I think that you either don't realize it or like your other denials of the obvious, you just don't want to realize it, but straight men are the most perverted people on the planet. Just as I wouldn't challenge you on matters of practicing law, you cannot challenge me on my experience of 14 years being in the porn business.

All one needs to do is go to http://clips4sale.com and look at the categories of the videos listed. Booger eating, vomiting, eye ball touching, fillings (yes in your mouth!) yawning, sleeping. those are all fetishes on a site that sells $50 million a year in video clips. I know the owners very well. They are based here in Tampa and I went to New Zealand with them in 2009. That is but one example. Who are the child sex predators? Straight men. Married straight men. They are the ones who take sex vacations to places like Cambodia and Dominican Republic and Thailand.

So please, get over your bullshit with the perversion claims. Who the fuck are YOU to judge who is perverted anyway? Because you make some money that gives you a right to judge? I thought that your book of fairy tales said not to judge? Or is that another inconvenient rule you choose to ignore too?
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
How you got away with another thread that was basically baiting and bashing Christians I'll never know. Because this thread is no different than the one Petra locked. You have no problem insulting anyone that disagrees with you.

Anyway, I am going on vacation for a few days tomorrow and will not have the pleasure of reading your musings.

On a personal note, my nephew is a chef trained at Johnson and Wales he saw your video the other day and told me to tell you to stop touching your hair so much when you are preparing food.

Um, I cook only for the video and 90% of the food I make is thrown out. I'm not cooking for other people and I guarantee my hair is cleaner than the plates in your kitchen. When I cook for other people I always have my hair in a pony tail.
And tell your nephew he should have gone to a real culinary school like CIA. I can start any thread I want. I am GOD
 
He may have went to the Mississippi Valley State of cooking schools but he makes 150,000 dollars a year so he is the Jerry Rice of culinary school alumni lol
 

Petra

Cult Mother and Simpering Cunt

Here you go! At least there's a loophole. o-O
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
absolutely true. I know many girls who ass fucked because they were afraid of getting pregnant. there is even a porn star who only has anal sex because she's saving her vag lol
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
but the average head chef makes about $175k a year. the top chefs that don't have TV deals or other income make at the most $250k a year. that's Michelin quality restaurants in the US. that's great for him but using him as a way to insult me was a swing and a miss. I didn't even know how to cook anything 3 years ago. 100% self-taught. So he paid for school and spent years learning to make $150k a year. I did it on my own, on my own time and make a lot more.

I win that one. next?
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
Im sorry, that 175k a year is supposed to be 75k and that's for an executive chef.

which restaurant? what city? top executive chefs rarely make $100k unless its a Michelin rated restaurant and there are ZERO 25 year old executive chefs at Michelin rated restaurants. So I'm calling bullshit
 
Im sorry, that 175k a year is supposed to be 75k and that's for an executive chef.

which restaurant? what city? top executive chefs rarely make $100k unless its a Michelin rated restaurant and there are ZERO 25 year old executive chefs at Michelin rated restaurants. So I'm calling bullshit

lol First I am not telling you where he works, but he works in Chicago.

And he is a co owner of a restaurant that I invested in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top