Does this make sense to anyone???
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQaQF39EbtehzlGgDJF34yEYviEwD93F8OD00
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQaQF39EbtehzlGgDJF34yEYviEwD93F8OD00
You couldn't have stated it better, Chef !It makes sense to me. Three punk ass kids broke into that guys home, tried to steal food, the home owner was scared for his life so he defended himself in fear. He had no clue if they had a weapon or anything. He had every legal right to defend himself, so he did.
Killing an intruder? Fine with me. My land, my shit. You enter that land, you're liable for a shotty blast to center mass. DO NOT FUCK WITH MY TWINKIES.
My cousin, who is on the Border Patrol, used to live in Laredo and that isn't a really good area. It's kind of run down and crappy.
It makes sense to me. Three punk ass kids broke into that guys home, tried to steal food, the home owner was scared for his life so he defended himself in fear. He had no clue if they had a weapon or anything. He had every legal right to defend himself, so he did.
I feel bad for the kids parents, but it wasn't that mans fault that their kid was stupid enough to try and rob somebodies home.
And be that the subject in question is acquitted, we might refer to the gentleman as "defendant" as opposed to "Texas Killer".
Does this make sense to anyone???
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQaQF39EbtehzlGgDJF34yEYviEwD93F8OD00
....."confronted the boys with a 16guage shotgun.Then forced the boys,who were unarmed,to their knees.....The boys say they were begging for forgiveness when Gonzalez hit them with the barrel of the shotgun & kicked them reapeatedly.The medical examiner testified Anquiano was SHOT IN THE BACK at close range".
Pretty unmanly of Gonzales to shoot a 13 year old in the back while down on his knees. :dunno: Maybe not a murder charge ,but the guy should have at least gotten some lesser charge.
We've turned into such a country of cowards that are so paranoid/fearful about crime that we can justify shooting a 13 year old in the back. Since friends & family know his name & location I wouldn't feel sorry if Mr Gonzales suffered a similiar fate.
....."confronted the boys with a 16guage shotgun.Then forced the boys,who were unarmed,to their knees.....The boys say they were begging for forgiveness when Gonzalez hit them with the barrel of the shotgun & kicked them reapeatedly.The medical examiner testified Anquiano was SHOT IN THE BACK at close range".
Pretty unmanly of Gonzales to shoot a 13 year old in the back while down on his knees. :dunno: Maybe not a murder charge ,but the guy should have at least gotten some lesser charge.
We've turned into such a country of cowards that are so paranoid/fearful about crime that we can justify shooting a 13 year old in the back. Since friends & family know his name & location I wouldn't feel sorry if Mr Gonzales suffered a similiar fate.
Whoa, hold on, thanx girk1, I didn't know the particulars of this matter, if the shooter (MR. G.) actually did do what girk1 mentioned, in light of these details I am certainly DISGUSTED @ this (COWARDS) actions, granted I said I would smoke em' if they break into my home! but, if I assessed the danger and had the (intruders) under control and (KNEW) they were an un-armed, harmless, hungry 13 yr olds I would NOT take that life, let alone beat em with the (butt-end) of a weapon!! :eek:
MR. GONZALES IS A COWARD AND SHOULD MOST DEFINITELY BE CHARGED WITH MURDER!! :thefinger
I am quite sure MR. GONZALES could have handled the situation without beating / killing one of the kids!! thats just UNMERCIFUL OVER-REACTION!! this man ought to be shamed to death!! :hatsoff: