Can't really say the same for this message board.We've really advanced though.
Can't really say the same for this message board.We've really advanced though.
mega, again in my example the context was the same.
it was a greeting, nothing more.
imagine a foreigner in the usa seeing 2 guys saying "what up fuckface" to each other, all smiley faced and stuff.
then that same light skinned foreigner walks up to both the guys and says " hey what up fuckfaces" , and gets a brutal beating by both.
How would you explain why that happened to the foreigner?
man this is new thread material is it not?
seriously though, how would you explain that in a way that makes sense?
ugh, oh, oh lawdy.
yes i teach english in schools and businesses, six days a week, 4 hours per day.
I understand what your trying to say.
here are some examples of context
Not to belabor the point but what you're giving examples of above (or trying to) are homonyms of which only maybe one example actually is. (Looking through a drawer and looking through a window..the use is the same.:2 centslook through - you can look through a drawer, a book, a closet , any enclosed area.
or you can look through a window or something clear.
look out- you can look out of a window ect, or it could be a warning.
get through - you can get through a tunnel, or you can make someone understand something, like how do i get through to hotmega.
or you can get through an ordeal or difficult situation.
get - could mean obtain, get coffee. change or become- get happy, married.
could mean arrive, get home.
ect ect.
Like the example I gave before with Carroll O'Connor...race doesn't inherently establish the contextbut a white guy saying whats up ****** and a black guy saying it does not mean a change in context, both ways are still a greeting.
Maybe not and you probably don't have to teach context per se as it's probably a universal concept. Colombians as well as anyone else in the world understand slang expressions can be interpreted different ways depending on the circumstances. But if they wanted to understand from you what that concept is, it's clear to me you would be woefully incapable of explaining it.now its about who can say what to who, and no i don't get into that in my classes.
the video was a good example of what you mean.
i just consider that more joking between friends.
but i see your point and it is a fine line between my point
Ok, serious question: What if I stub my toe, or accidentally hit my elbow on a door jamb, or something similarly clumsy, and I remark, out of pain and surprise: "******!" Would that be considered racist? The intent of being racist or hateful towards the door jamb isn't there, the context is the use of an interjection to remark on my pain, and an inanimate object cannot, IMO, be of any type of racial group. Is it racist? Or is it no harm (no harm intended nor felt), no foul?
Is the racism of that comment (or lack thereof) decreased if I am alone (tree falling, no one around type stuff), increased if in a small group or around animals etc...?
yes i understand racism.
what makes you think i don't?
its something that white people have for blacks.
right?
and you know what? its not a major problem because there really isnt too much of it in the states.
at least the only racism that most people want to acknowledge .
one problem is people judging and deciding who can say what about who and to who.
"are you white? oh you can't say that" = racism in its most basic level.
and thats the biggest form of racism today in the states and because of that people are afraid to speak and think.
as ive said a million times before i just want the usa folks to unite and stop all the stupid accusations of racism. its nonsense and it only hurts everybody.
totally wrong again boy. but nice example of what my point was.
btw youve got cooties too.
mega, again in my example the context was the same.
it was a greeting, nothing more.
and nothing ive ever said should offend blacks because ive never said anything demeaning about them.
i have offended a lot of white people here but their guilt complex is not my problem.
boidefensegrad i think you misunderstood my posts.
the op was about the overuse of the word racist and racism in the usa today.
but the arguments must begin as if you can't say what the op said.
its forbidden.
the words are very overused and arguing that theyre not is like arguing over what color an orange is.
yes i understand racism.
what makes you think i don't?
its something that white people have for blacks.
right?
and you know what? its not a major problem because there really isnt too much of it in the states.
at least the only racism that most people want to acknowledge .
one problem is people judging and deciding who can say what about who and to who.
"are you white? oh you can't say that" = racism in its most basic level.
and thats the biggest form of racism today in the states and because of that people are afraid to speak and think.
as ive said a million times before i just want the usa folks to unite and stop all the stupid accusations of racism. its nonsense and it only hurts everybody.
many call each other ****** and motherfucker all the time
followed by a click-clack sound unfortunately
I have to disagree when you say there isn't too much racism these days. I think there is still a LOT of it. It's just not out in the open like it was back in the early 60's in the south. Even though you don't hear about it, and even though all of your white friends deny that they are racist, there are still plenty of prejudiced people.
By the way, racism isn't just for white people. There are MANY black people who are as racist as anyone. Prejudiced people come in all shapes, sizes and colors.
the first post was a quote from a zappa song called you are what you is.
"a cow don't make ham".
I thought it was apt for the thread.
so you don't think that I'm respectful, fair or honest?
ok.
I do.
your last comment tells me that either You Misunderstood my question or that you have never been around black folks.
many call each other ****** and motherfucker all the time.
I clearly didn't suggest that someone of any color walk up to any person and say that.
it was a what if question combined with a how would you explain that to a foreigner who has no idea of how that is in the states question
nobody did answer the question directly.
again your either not understanding my posts at all or your doing exactly what this thread is about and looking for reasons to call, suggest or imply racism when its really not there.
people can falsley accuse me of being racist all they want.
its not gonna shut me up.
I'm not gonna play that game, and it is a game.
meesterperfect, I don't understand how you can liken the difference between a Scandanavian & a Japanese person (have you seen Bjork?) to apples and bananas, and still claim to not be a racist.
That quote quite blatantly proves that you subscribe to a belief in race, in their being two distinct species of human being. It is, quite literally, racist. That you cannot (or refuse to) see that, is incredible.
I can't believe you had the balls to tell us that you are an educator.
You are ridiculous, man. I didn't read into anything. I am not misunderstanding you. I'm speaking directly to what you said. Oh, I'm sorry, you're saying I did not pick up on the "context" of what you said?I really don't understand what you're problem is.
I've said nothing that should be taken as offensive.
the message in the zappa song was simply be yourself.
and the question was legitimate.
how would you explain to a foreigner who saw 2 blacks calling each other "that word" why he himself should not use it?
I don't even care at this point.
but i do know why it wasn't answered.
thank you. i feel my posts are clear and precise too.
but they have no hidden implications as you think they do.
shouldn't look for racism where it ain't there.