President plays the race card?

[busenbust]

Race card?? Someone mention the TP ! and their placards! :shy: :o

 

[jjo_is4]

what are you like 14? 15?

If I'm 14 or 15 then you must be about 8 or 9.

Well at least your butties liked your nothing post.
You never respond with anything but little cheap shots.
Like a child.

I'm glad many board regulars enjoyed it. Just a bit of harmless fun, MP. :1orglaugh

And I've been posting here for years.

In fact I was the first one to post anything about obama on this board.

That's interesting. I'll look into that. :computer:

Yes you have created at least 11 Obama threads over the last 2 years. All negative I'm sure. I bet you haven't said anything positive about the big O. Do you have anything positive to say about Obama?

I am part of no group here.

You don't need to sign up it just kind of happens without you realizing it, then you're in the rep club. That's so long as you continue to fight the good fight.

Are you?

Maybe. :dunno: I don't mind so long as it's not a group that posts hate for other races or reglions. I don't believe my race or lack of religion makes me better or worse than any other race or someone with strong religious views.

Too bad if you don't like my post, I don't care.
And its true, everything I said.
The guy is just playing these people.
playing you.

Yes, it's obvious you don't care. Everything you say is true. That's why you called yourself MEESTERPERFECT.

 

[meesterperfect]

I have defended Obama a few times here and in the real world.
But mostly I see him as a pandering, divisive politician who is part of a group which has a certain plan which they are trying to put into place and which is bad for the whole country in the long run.
i see him as a product of the democratic party, like the jonas brothers and britney spears are products of the music biz.
not popular for talent or hard work, just chosen to be cash machines.

Just note how they turned on their one time golden girl Hillary so fast before the democratic primaries.
that was brutal, but they had to get her out of the way, Obama had more marketabilty.
So I don't have many good things to say about him.
And even if i liked him i wouldn't defend him for everything like so many do.

And my name is sarcasm.

 

[jjo_is4]

I have defended Obama a few times here and in the real world.

That's news to me but... :hatsoff:

And my name is sarcasm.

Whatever you say MP. :1orglaugh

 

[roronoa3000]

This stuff is painfully to read.

 

[meesterperfect]

Painful.......Its Painful.

 

[Spleen]

Obama doesn't play the race card.

He uses the whole god damn deck.

 

[MILF Man]

Obama doesn't play the race card.

He uses the whole god damn deck.

Very well said! Your getting some Rep!

 

[Hot Mega]

Obama doesn't play the race card.

He uses the whole god damn deck.

Very well said! Your getting some Rep!

As evidenced by?

(Does anyone have a :crickets: smiley to refer to Petra?....I sense one would come in handy here.)

 

[meesterperfect]

the whole "we this" ' We that" stuff.
He's not talking about Americans , he's taliking about blacks.
" We" meaning ' I am black like you, not white like them".
The whole damn thing is a race card.
Its the blame game, "its republicans faults" "its their fault(meaning you know who)".
It doesn't help black americans any(unless of course getting more on welfare is the solution) , but it sure is an effective way to get a lot of democratic votes
the old saying you can lead a horse to water" you know.
if people can't or won't see it what can anybody do.

If he or any leader really wanted to help black americans he would preach to them about bad and irresponsible parenting,, put the responsibility and blame on them because in reality that is the root of all the problems within their group.
But then again that wouldn't get them too many votes so we play the card game.

cheerio
:hatsoff:

 

[Hot Mega]

the whole "we this" ' We that" stuff.
He's not talking about Americans , he's taliking about blacks.
" We" meaning ' I am black like you, not white like them".
The whole damn thing is a race card.
Its the blame game, "its republicans faults" "its their fault(meaning you know who)".
It doesn't help black americans any(unless of course getting more on welfare is the solution) , but it sure is an effective way to get a lot of democratic votes
the old saying you can lead a horse to water" you know.
if people can't or won't see it what can anybody do.

If he or any leader really wanted to help black americans he would preach to them about bad and irresponsible parenting,, put the responsibility and blame on them because in reality that is the root of all the problems within their group.
But then again that wouldn't get them too many votes so we play the card game.

cheerio
:hatsoff:

When Obama says in his address here, "We've got more work to do.." (in the context of the upcoming election), who do you take him to be referring to?

 

[Friday on my mind]

When Obama says in his address here, "We've got more work to do.." (in the context of the upcoming election), who do you take him to be referring to?

Let me answer that for him.


He would say as he did say in his post that Obama is talking to blacks exclusively,while you and I know Obama is talking to not just blacks but everyone else that is in favor of his progressive agenda.Meaning most blacks,most other minorities and a fair percentage of whites.

In reality it's the republicans not the democrates who have a narrow base racially, almost exclusively white.

 

[Hot Mega]

Let me answer that for him.


He would say as he did say in his post that Obama is talking to blacks exclusively,while you and I know Obama is talking to not just blacks but everyone else that is in favor of his progressive agenda.Meaning most blacks,most other minorities and a fair percentage of whites.

In reality it's the republicans not the democrates who have a narrow base racially, almost exclusively white.

FOMM we're not going to let you play anymore if you keep taking the fun out of this.:1orglaugh

 

[Spleen]

As evidenced by?

Honestly I just felt like saying it. Personally, I love Obama.

 

[Hot Mega]

Honestly I just felt like saying it. Personally, I love Obama.

Oh the brilliance!!! And you got repped by a 'certifiable' Obama hater for it. :bowdown::1orglaugh

Bra-VO!!!:clap:

 

[meesterperfect]

Let me answer that for him.


He would say as he did say in his post that Obama is talking to blacks exclusively,while you and I know Obama is talking to not just blacks but everyone else that is in favor of his progressive agenda.Meaning most blacks,most other minorities and a fair percentage of whites.

In reality it's the republicans not the democrates who have a narrow base racially, almost exclusively white.

by progrssive agenda you mean more tax and spend right?

I basically said all i wanted in my former post.
i will add that the whole thing is a game for these people.
you think that they represent you but they only represent themselves.
you guys are just chickens being fed what you want to hear but they profit from the eggs.
you think youre number one but you ain't even number two(get it?).
And the whole Obama thing is a race card.
they even have politicians admitting to it on tape.
they were very confident with hillary but when obama came along they realized he was more electable so they threw her in the gutter, turned on her like rabid dogs.
Just part of the game.
the card game.A white women with experience, she's a full house.
But a black guy, not to old, strong speaker, ect.....he's a straight flush.

And like i said, if he really wanted to help these people he would address their problems within themselves regardless of consequence instead of divide and conquer.

 

[Hot Mega]

by progrssive agenda you mean more tax and spend right?

I basically said all i wanted in my former post.
i will add that the whole thing is a game for these people.
you think that they represent you but they only represent themselves.
you guys are just chickens being fed what you want to hear but they profit from the eggs.
you think youre number one but you ain't even number two(get it?).

Got it! We ain't shit. But in reading your diatribe I could have swore it was the ramblings of some reformed GOPer who finally got the Fox "News"/GOPer game. I really did.

And the whole Obama thing is a race card.
they even have politicians admitting to it on tape.
they were very confident with hillary but when obama came along they realized he was more electable so they threw her in the gutter, turned on her like rabid dogs.
Just part of the game.
the card game.A white women with experience, she's a full house.
But a black guy, not to old, strong speaker, ect.....he's a straight flush.

What do you think constitutes electability?? It's not just experience (years in some office or body of g'ment). If that were the case Gore and Kerry would have beaten Bush. While they were foraging their political careers W was somewhere snuggled up and passed out next to an empty 5th of Jim Beam.

If it were just about experience (years in politics) "McSayanything" (aka McCain) would have beaten Obama.

It wasn't just about what Obama was as I'm certain that played as big a role in votes he garnered as well as it did for Clinton and McCain. Certainly if it was just about blacks voting for blacks...why on earth would they have ever participated in any presidential election until the last one???

Although it was about the way he was saying things as anyone knows if you want to lead anything you need to be able to articulate your plan well enough to inspire people to believe you can and will do what you say...but you also have to articulate policies people believe in.

That's what caused people to side with Obama over Clinton and further Obama over McCain. Some people like me viewed Clinton and McCain as cut from the same cloth...not white but old versus new. Most people wanted to part ways with the last generation of politics as they played over the last 20 years. Fairly or unfairly McCain and Clinton are viewed as part of that.

And like i said, if he really wanted to help these people he would address their problems within themselves regardless of consequence instead of divide and conquer.

Then he's simply "pandering" for white votes when he does this right?? I suppose though if there was any sense in him "pandering" for white votes he wouldn't been delivering the speech in front of throngs of clapping black folk right?? Oh well, I guess I can leave you to figure out the consistency with the claim. :1orglaugh When Cosby says it he's hailed when Obama says it he's assailed...(Sorry, been listening to too much of the "Reverend Jackson" and the late Johnny Cochran. :o)

 

[Friday on my mind]

Mr P,

In the 70s the democratic nomination process got more democratic with primaries (the people) having more sway then they previously had.To be honest I'm not so sure that really has always had a better result than what some would call party bosses having more say.

It was the primary voters who went for Obama over Hillary,most of the establishment was with Hillary.

To think somehow the bosses thought the black guy was more electable is ludicrous.There is simply no way being black can be spun into being an advantage for Obama and not a hurdle.

As someone I know told me and I think it rings true "George Bush was so bad he got a black guy elected".

:hatsoff:

 

[meesterperfect]

Mr P


In the 70s the democratic nomination process got more democratic with primaries (the people) having more sway then they previously had.To be honest I'm not so sure that really has always had a better result than what some would call party bosses having more say.

It was the primary voters who went for Obama over Hillary,most of the establishment was with Hillary.

To think somehow the bosses thought the black guy was more electable is ludicrous.There is simply no way being black can be spun into being an advantage for Obama and not a hurdle.

As someone I know told me and I think it rings true "George Bush was so bad he got a black guy elected".

:hatsoff:

Thank you mega, I liked your diatribe also.
Diatribe, what a funny word.
sounds like a hay fever medication.

true friday, the people voted for him in the primaries, got him the nomination.
but if you think the fact that his skin color wasn't a huge factor in the fact that the members of his party and the news media supported and promoted him unlike anybody i've ever seen in the past from any party than i believe you are in denial.
We disagree, what more can be said.
I don't care about his racial make up, I do believe MOSt of his voters and supporters do/did. I only mention it because its relevant to the thread topic.

 

[Hot Mega]

Thank you mega, I liked your diatribe also.
Diatribe, what a funny word.
sounds like a hay fever medication.

If it ever comes up in your classes you may want to know the distinction between a diatribe and a response.

true friday, the people voted for him in the primaries, got him the nomination.
but if you think the fact that his skin color wasn't a huge factor in the fact that the members of his party and the news media supported and promoted him unlike anybody i've ever seen in the past from any party than i believe you are in denial.
We disagree, what more can be said.
I don't care about his racial make up, I do believe MOSt of his voters and supporters do/did. I only mention it because its relevant to the thread topic.

If true and his race played as dominant a role as you claim...simple question, why didn't this overwhelming advantage work for Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton?




(Can someone pleeeease find Petra a :crickets: smiley)