Official: Bush is a Dumbass

[harold]

I am not a Bush guy, but you have to be somewhat fair. How come the web site doesn't feature our only impeached president?

I mean, talk about a dumbass. Who can be attributed to this famous quote, "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman". That's right, a blow job from another women isn't sex, well, at least that's what I tell my wife. After all, that's what President Clinton said.

Now we have a presidential candidate that has flipp-flopped on almost every quote that has ever come out of his mouth. Oh, wait, we can't be hold him accountable because he went to Viet Nam and is a war hero. Just watch excuses fly as more is learned about his affair with his intern.

This is a great year for mudslinging, but you gotta watch both sides.

Ranger

:glugglug: :glugglug: :glugglug:

bush vs clinton

-bush is a moron. clinton is very smart
-bush lies about policy (which by the way effects all of our lives even the lives of people in france). clinton lied about who he had sex with (and is this not a free PORN website which promotes sex with LOTS of people) WHO GIVES A ****!!!

to say bush does not flip flop is a joke. look at his stance on why we went to war. "we went to war becuase sadam had WMD's which were a clear threat to world peace. LIE. we went to war because sadam had "wepons of mass distruction related activies" -2004 state of the union. LIE. we went to war becuase sadam supported al quada. LIE. We went to war because sadam was an evil doer. kinda true.

bush is full of **** and has gotten over 800 americans ****** becuase of his arragent policies.

 

[harold]

BY that logic, if Kerry is elected now, we could have McCain in 2008.

That would rock.

McCain is good. but what is bush wins. we could have hilary in 2008

 

[harold]

my thoughts on this link.

You cannot like him that is your matter but you must recognize that he fights terrorism strongly and efficiently.

regards and no offense taken

no offense taken but how could anyone know if w has been efficient or effective against terrorism. it seems to me that there has been many bombings around the world (one which effected the out come of an ellection against the united states). Also how many times has islamic terrorists attacked the united states? 2. once in 93 one wtc and the other in 2001. so it looks like they tend to take there time. and by my calculations we are not do for another ****** in the US untill 2009. but these things are highly unpredictable. unless your a terrorist?

 

[harold]

I just hope Bush is re-elected for the sole reason that Hillary Clinton would have a nice shot in 2008.

Whoever is elected this next term is gonna have a hard time of proving anything. The next term isn't going to be a good one... Im aiming for a good president in 2008. And Hillary Clinton will more than likely be the Democrat in that election if Bush is re-elected.

So Im voting Bush.

For all the Bill Clinton bashers... He was still a great president. Whether you liked him or not. A blowjob doesn't make you less of a leader. Well... Depends on how good of a BJ it was... Might need to rest before resuming duties.:hatsoff:

I agree...:hatsoff: :hatsoff: :hatsoff:
although there might not be a country in 4 years if bush is reelected

 

[harold]

this is my last post on the subject. I would just like everyone to know that i am very *****.:****: :****: :glugglug:

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

Why the FUCK would any one want Hillary Clinton as the President? Dumbest thing I've heard yet.

 

[Goblin]

Well... Since you live in hell I will educate you.

Hillary Clinton is considered to be one of the Top Politicians.

Bill Clinton... FOLLOWED her advise. Not the other way around. She has strong beliefs and she stands by for what she believes in. She is more centered than a lot of politicians.

AND She is a brilliant person.

And there is the whole female=better at thinking thing. They think with both sides of their brain at the same time! Did you know that? (LOL This last bit is crap...)

 

[Ranger]

Unfortunately, she is so liberal that she wants a re-distribution of wealth. You make the money, they take it away(tax) and give it to someone else(entitlements).
I don't know about you or what you do, but I work my ass off for my coin. I don't need any politician telling me that I need to send them more money. Right now, you work until someday in June to pay the government. That it the biggest reason I got away from the tax happy democrats.
I support a lot of liberal causes but when it comes to my money............it is mine. Now it is possible that you don't make enough to care. So be it, I was at that point in my life at one time. But, you will get to the point where you would rather spend your own money, than have some politician spend it for you. And I live in one of the highest taxed states in the US.
There are plenty of other reasons to dislike Hilliary. I won't get into them because this post is probably going to open up a can of worms(or wuppass). It is late and I have been working way too hard today. Time to *****.

Ranger:glugglug: :****:

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

Not a big fan of Bush, but I'd take him 10 times in a row over Hillary. God, I just can't even imagine her in there. Scary, truly scary.

 

[Goblin]

Ummm... WHY?! At least Ranger has a reason.

I personally think redistribution of wealth is a good thing. Not in Large Quantities. But the rich get richer by taking advantage of the situation.

(I know Ranger is a small business owner and probably doesn't take advantage of workers Im not targeting him.)

But say a company like Microsoft wants to pay you 5.65 an hour to do Data Entry. Work load piles up. High Stress job.

And they don't have to give you a pay raise.

You can't quit... cus every other ass in the country is doing the same damn thing. And if you quit... it doesn't hurt the company any because there is always someone out there in more need for even that minimum wage job.

Im prior Military... I have 3 years office experience outside of school. 7 if you count school. And I have more computer skills than most people but people want to pay me a maximum of $8.50 an hour. Well... Thats just because why?! The rich want to keep their money. Well keep your money and pay more taxes. Either way I get some of what you are getting you cheap bastards.

Anyways... this is why I decided to go to college. So I can get more skills and still be paid 8.50 by some asshole.

:hatsoff:

 

[parker]

But say a company like Microsoft wants to pay you 5.65 an hour to do Data Entry. Work load piles up. High Stress job.

I saw a statistic on the news recently about how (almost all of) the wealthiest corporations in the US pay no income tax. The majority of income tax collected is paid by the middle class and small business. Don't you think the big business fats cats should be paying something?

 

[Ranger]

They should, but, as long as there are attorneys to find loop holes, they won't. They can use profits for all kinds of deductions, R&D, acquiring property, depreciation.
I think that the only way to really be fair is a flat tax. But, I not so versed on that, so I will give the soap box to someone who knows more than me.

ranger:hatsoff:

 

[Goblin]

Im Not a tax person... I know small business owners can get away with a lot.

My ******-in-law sells and maintains copying machines. He deducts all kinds of things from his taxes.

Still has to pay though I think.

 

[obiwan]

I mean, talk about a dumbass. Who can be attributed to this famous quote, "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman".

Let's do a little comparison here of two famous lies:

1. I didn't have sexual relations with that woman

cost to US taxpayers = $0
cost of US soldiers lives = 0

2. Iraq posesses stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction

Cost to US taxpayers = $86 billion and rising
Cost of US Soldiers lives = 837 and rising


You tell me, who's the bigger dumbass?

 

[Ranger]

Unfortunately, obiwan, if they do find WMD, you will be the dumbass.

Right now the people such as myself that belive that Saddam has stashed the WMD are dumbasses.

Keep in mind, Clinton, Kerry, the UN, Hilliary, Kennedy, etc. etc. all stated that Saddam had WMD two years ago. Well before the presidential race and the invasion. Unfortunately, these people have to find something to set them apart from the current administration. So they flip-flopped.

Too bad it harms the morale of our troops.

Keep in mind, all Saddam needed is a box car, buried in an area the size of California.

Ranger, the dumbass:glugglug:

 

[P-hound]

the terminator can burn in hell for all i care. dont get me started with Arnold. my favorite quote of his is, "Gay marriage should be between a man and a woman." Well said...dumbass!

ok,
so that's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

oh Arnold.
what ever happened to the good old days of just making
crappy but fun to watch movies?
why'd you have to go and try to get all serious?

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

I mean, talk about a dumbass. Who can be attributed to this famous quote, "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman".

Let's do a little comparison here of two famous lies:

1. I didn't have sexual relations with that woman

cost to US taxpayers = $0
cost of US soldiers lives = 0

2. Iraq posesses stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction

Cost to US taxpayers = $86 billion and rising
Cost of US Soldiers lives = 837 and rising


You tell me, who's the bigger dumbass?

And I'm sure when Saddam used those WMD or encouraged someone else to use them on the USA, you'd feel like a pretty big dumb ass yourself. Oh wait, you'll be dead if that happens. Saddam posed a threat to everybody who didn't follow him. The World is a much better place without him, plain and simple. Was Bush's reasoning, or evidence the best, no. But atleast Bush had the balls to do something about a World ******, before he was able to do something to the World.

And, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Clinton/Monica thing cost the taxpayers some cash? I mean, they tried impeaching him for that. Stuff like that doesn't come free.

 

[Goblin]

Kumbi Yaaaaaa.

Can't we just hold hands and not have our interns giving us blowjobs? (At least if your married.)

 

[obiwan]

Unfortunately, obiwan, if they do find WMD, you will be the dumbass.

Oh, excuse me. The country has been occupied for nearly a year and a half and so far they've found nothing, zilch, nada, not even a water ******. A scruffy bearded old guy in a hole in some remote town? Sure, no problem. But a huge stockpile of weapons that threatened the entire world? Um, I dunno...maybe it fell down behind the couch. Ask yourselves this: If you had at your disposal a fucking huge pile of weapons that could (we were told) be deployed in 45 minutes, and one morning you looked out the window of your Baghdad palace and saw the biggest, most pissed off army bearing down on your ass, wouldn't you, sorta...USE THEM??? What kind of threat was he if he couldn't even defend his own country??

Yes, Kerry initially supported the war. You know what? So did millions of other people. You know why? Because they were lied to! If they make the mistake of trusting our elected officials, how does that make them more guilty than the liars?

but didn't the Clinton/Monica thing cost the taxpayers some cash?

Only after Ken Starr, the man who believes that anyone who isn't a right wing conservative is an enemy of the state, tore into Clinton like a starving pitbull. It didn't quite cost $86 billion. And it failed.

Saddam posed a threat to everybody who didn't follow him. The World is a much better place without him, plain and simple.

Let's not forget that if it wasn't for our dearly departed 40th President, Saddam would merely have been a threat to his nearest Baghdad Unemployment office. The USA made him who he was. Just like they made Pinochet, Noriega, Islam Karimov and, yes, Bin Laden.

 

[Chomp]

Oh, excuse me. The country has been occupied for nearly a year and a half and so far they've found nothing, zilch, nada, not even a water ******. A scruffy bearded old guy in a hole in some remote town? Sure, no problem. But a huge stockpile of weapons that threatened the entire world? Um, I dunno...maybe it fell down behind the couch. Ask yourselves this: If you had at your disposal a fucking huge pile of weapons that could (we were told) be deployed in 45 minutes, and one morning you looked out the window of your Baghdad palace and saw the biggest, most pissed off army bearing down on your ass, wouldn't you, sorta...USE THEM??? What kind of threat was he if he couldn't even defend his own country??

Actually...the search for WMDs in Iraq have been conducted since the Clinton crew have been in office(who also found no sign of WMDs). Of course they used the United Nations as a means of searching in Iraq, unlike Bush. He took the bomb the **** out of them, and THEN ask the UN for help...idiot.

I think "Dubya's" ***** made him go to war with Iraq. It has been concluded that they had no WMD's and no involvment in the terrorrist attacks on 9/11. The only reason left to go to war with Iraq is the oil...heh.

The only real terrorist I see is Bush himself. I am more afraid of Bush than I have ever been of Saddam.

"Bush Bush Bush dumb dumb dumb bomb bomb bomb the constitution."