I don't know how I could forget Lemieux. He actually has the greatest statistic (IMO) in the league's history: averaged over 2 points a game over the course of his career. Truly he might have been better than anyone to play the game. I did like the early 90s years with Federov, Bure , Jagr and Selanne and the numbers they were puting up. And I agree, Lindros could've been one of the greats, but his size might have worked against him. I know I would've went out and tried to **** him just because of his size. I always hated big players, and I know a lot of other guys that head hunted big goons.
Sorry to have to correct you, but everyone seems to forget that Lemieux came out of retirement and, subsequently, his career points per game average went down to 1.883, now second to Gretzky's 1.921. Seeing as how that was the only record that Lemieux ever owned and Gretzky holds over 60 NHL records and all the most important ones, I think it's ridiculous to claim that anyone besides Gretzky was the greatest to ever play the game. A lot of people like to do so, but I think they all must just be fooling themselves or trying to be different.
However, Lemieux was, in my opinion, the only player to ever play who deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Gretzky and the only player who was ever truly on Gretzky's level.
And, not to be a jerk, but to say that: "He [Lemieux] actually has the greatest statistic (IMO) in the league's history" makes no sense because statistics are empirical and factual. To claim that, in your opinion, Lemieux was the greatest of all-time is justifiable (though incorrect), because that's an opinion. Statistics, like I said (or typed), are factual, they're not based on opinion. And the facts are quite clear.