This is thread is pure gold
thank you. I try.
This is thread is pure gold
The art of the deal you motherfuckers.
Once again, our emperor-president confounds the leftist cucks.
This is no community organizer.
The liberal media will stop at nothing to instill fear. Dr. Sanjay Gupta just said on CNN that 117 million people in the USA have chronic diseases. Who's ass did he pull that number from? Just because someone has earned a degree doesn't make them the guardian of truth.
CDC says that 78M people are obese. Is the repeal of Obamacare going to block their doors from walking around the block and shove doughnuts down their throats?
Obesity is usually a condition of the poor. Healthy food is typically more expensive (to buy and to prepare) than unhealthy food. The poor typically work longer hours or more tiring jobs, having less time and energy to cook. Plus access to gyms, etc. I hate the obesity epidemic, but I blame poverty and the convenience of unhealthy food.
The availability of healthcare is not a problem. Pills have replaced surgery. Diagnosis technology is mind boggling and only getting better. People are living longer. The problem is the cost. This needs to be addressed now. Throwing money at the problem isn't the answer.
I'll spare y'all the mantra I've posted every time this subject comes up. Still looking for a solution better than mine.
Still looking for a solution better than mine.
The problem is the cost. This needs to be addressed now. Throwing money at the problem isn't the answer.
I do agree with this point. Though I haven't heard any competent plan from either side that would result in lower prices. The left's argument was that if everyone was in a healthcare plan, the costs would go down. In theory, that makes sense. But most people who had insurance, had it due to a benefit of their job. These are typically working, healthy people too busy (and healthy) to go to the doctor all the time and cost money for the insurance company. Most people that had no insurance (not all, of course) were that way because their insurance was too expensive and/or they didn't have a job that included it. These were more likely to be older, sicker people. So getting them on insurance plans drove the costs up for everyone else.
The only thing I've heard from the right to drive down costs is the "across state lines" thing which I'm not sure why that's a partisan issue. But realistically you can't expect that to affect cost in any significant way, as most large insurance companies have no problem competing in markets they find profitable.
The real problem with cost seems to be that we are all focused on the thing we pay for - insurance. But what really makes insurance high is health care as a whole is stupid expensive in America. Hospitals, doctors, labs, equipment, medicine, etc. are all outrageously expensive compared to other countries. But the only thing we see is the cost of insurance. We don't shop for a doctor based on cost. We don't choose a lab to get our results from because one was a bargain. Insurance causes our "capitalist" healthcare system to put blindfolds on all the consumers, therefore defeats the purpose of having a capitalist system.
Part of the master plan to destroy free market healthcare.
And how well was that free market healthcare working for us?
Seems to me it was/is destroying a lot of us.
I mean sure, I like the concept in theory. But why is it such a sacred cow, despite having evolved into such a gawdawful fucked up mess in practice?
Really not sure what all the celebrating is about as I don't see much of anything in this new bill that's going alleviate that mess.
Round two: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Health_Care_Act
Second paragraph mentions cost savings ranging from $350 billion per year immediately to 40% of all national health expenditures.
Those were estimates from 10 years ago, before the bill was passed into law. Have those numbers stood up under the working system?