Brino said:You know I wish there were more conservatives on this board to argue with.
i know what you are meaning but unfortunately we are few conservatives and so is the situation
Brino said:You know I wish there were more conservatives on this board to argue with.
georges said:hi brino
1):nono: for me kerry and bush have two diffrent characters and personalities that means that kerry would have other reaction than gwb has.
georges said:2) the cia and the fbi couldn't confirm???weak excuse.
georges said:because france trapped Carlos the famous terrorists (real name vladimir illich sanchez ramirez) by having finger prints and by having photographies of him at all airports and railway station before he could put bomb on a high speed train.
georges said:For ben laden they should have opened their eyes more wider and controlling everyone from the bag to the last pocket as well as seeing on the pc if he wasn't a terrorist especially people coming from countries of where the 9/11 hijackers come from.
tenet failed.Would it have been richard bissell or john karamessines or allen dulles that would have never happened.
Brino said:
1)Perhaps but policy wise their very similar on terrorism
2)If the CIA and FBI didnt know who was responsible for the bombing of the USS Cole while Clinton was in office then how was Clinton to know who to deal with or even attack?
3):2offtopic Maybe I'm missing something but what does that have to do with the bombing of the USS Cole?
4)Tenet did fail! He failed a lot that's why Bush shouldnt have invaded Iraq based on his word. But you cant put the full blame for 9/11 on Tenet other people in the Bush administration should have been paying more attention. Remember the report titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S." the President saw that and did nothing.
Originally posted by georges
2) the cia and the fbi couldn't confirm??? weak excuse. because france trapped Carlos the famous terrorists (real name vladimir illich sanchez ramirez) by having finger prints and by having photographies of him at all airports and railway station before he could put bomb on a high speed train.
For ben laden they should have opened their eyes more wider and controlling everyone from the bag to the last pocket as well as seeing on the pc if he wasn't a terrorist especially people coming from countries of where the 9/11 hijackers come from.
tenet failed.Would it have been richard bissell or john karamessines or allen dulles that would have never happened.
Originally posted by Brino
You know I wish there were more conservatives on this board to argue with.
georges said:2) You must always foresee what can happen that is what the cia and fbi have forgotten to do
Starman said:Is a Socialist just as good to argue with, or is it only the Conservatives you want to argue with? *LOL*
georges said:3) would there have been soldiers keeping an eye on the uss cole as well as looking for who entered as well as a personal uss cole crew check and what was braught into the uss cole that wouldn't have happened.
Originally posted by Brino
Unfortunately my views and yours are probably to close for us to argue. Unless you think you have one really radical extreme left argument or belief? I'll be happy to argue with you then!
Starman said:Well, I guess the only thing we can argue about is economics, taxes and capitalism. Other than that there are not much differences...
Originally posted by Brino
Ok! What dont you like about them?
Starman said:Like? It's not a matter of liking or not, it's just different opinions about how to do it between the Socialdemocrats and the Liberals/Conservatives (the co-operate against us.) here in Sweden. They think lowering the taxes solves every problem in the world. Some of those politicians are very ridiculous about that. This is a true story, one guy was asked about what to do about different problems in the society, on every question he answered that if we lower the taxes etc. I'm not kidding you, even when it came to the question of what to do about racism he gave lowering the taxes as a solution. *LOL*
Brino said:Oh and I forgot
I might be wrong but if I remember correctly the bombing of the USS Cole was from a boat wired with explosives that rammed the Cole. Not from a bomb that was planted on the Cole. I could be wrong though.
Starman said:Georges, or someone else... This is a little confusing, I must have missed it in the news or something... Have I missed something here? Has Bin Ladin been in USA, since he became an enemy to USA?
Brino said:Ok so the Liberals/Conservatives in Sweden want to lower the taxes. What do the SocialDemocrats want to do?
BTW Same problem here with politicians wanting to lower the taxes except here its mainly for the rich and not the poor.
georges said:yes but it was boat that was sent from a harbour and aimed at the uss cole so why did the fbi or the soldiers who were at the harbour did not inspect all the boats? However i am sure that there was someone of the uss cole crew who could have been a potential informator for the terrorists. all is possible.
Starman said:The Socialdemocrats, in co-operation with the Enviromental party and the Left party (former Communists, now having the Socialdemocratic ideology instead.), wants to have the taxes to remain the same, or when needed raise them, to be able to finance schools, hospitals, and elderly care.
The Liberals/Conservatives wants to lower the taxes, financing the tax cuts by taking money from just those things I mentioned above, and they want to privaticize all the companies that are owned by the state. They want Pure Capitalism, not Planned Economizing.
Brino said:As for an informant to the terrorists thats just speculation so you cant do much about that if you dont know beforehand. I'm not sure how U.S. troops are supposed to inspect privately owned boats in a foreign harbor especially if they have no idea whether theres going to be a terrorist attack or not. And if they did have knowledge of a terrorist attack planned against one of there ships I think they would just avoid the harbor all together and have the local government take care of the terrorists.
Brino said:Is it just me or does it seem extremely odd that all the people who support Bush arent American and all the people who are against Bush are American. Weird!
Are you even reading the links I'm giving to support F9/11 or are you only reading the links I'm giving that are against it? If you read the links that support F9/11 youd see that's not true. Michael Moore created the War Room to answer his critics so he is holding himself accountable. There's a difference between Michael Moore and the Media. The media are supposed to be unbiased Moore on the other hand doesnt need to be. He has even admitted that he made F9/11 for the purpose of getting Bush out of office. Though there is questionable editing and a few halftruths in F9/11 we shouldnt let those shift our focus from all the truths in F9/11. What about all the things in F9/11 that are true?
I find it quite believable that he's a bumbling idiot. After all what other documenteries has he done? He's an amateur and thus he could be exactly as the Daily Show made him out to be.
Yea Kerry's the one who will only use force when neccessary not Bush.
Dont bring Clinton into this. You'll lose. Trust me!
Originally posted by Dirty Sanchez
Are you sure, or are you going to flip flop like Kerry does on everything?