Guys we got a breaking news report from KING 4 NEWS!
Loose Change - What Do You All Think?
- Thread starter WTC7WasPulled
- Start date
- Status
Ok, lets turn this whole thing around and say that the USA blew up the Twin towers, tower 7, the Pentagon, so that they gained the reason to start the 'War on terror'.
How does this explain all the other attacks across the world, London tube trains, Madrid train bombings? Or, is it by the USA fitting up Al Qaeda for 911, Al Qaeda have decided to actually make their own terrorist attacks?
What was gained by invading Iraq?
What was gained by invading Afghanistan? There won't be a victory, all that's going to happen there is that a political excuse to withdraw is found, the talk is already happening.
Despite all the talk, if there's no victory in Afghanistan there's no way anyone will entertain invading Iran.
Who gains?
I can see your very dedicated to making your point, but sometimes you can be stood so close to a tree, you can't see you're in a forest. Spin the whole thing around, it makes no sense.
Ok, lets turn this whole thing around and say that the USA blew up the Twin towers, tower 7, the Pentagon, so that they gained the reason to start the 'War on terror'.
How does this explain all the other attacks across the world, London tube trains, Madrid train bombings? Or, is it by the USA fitting up Al Qaeda for 911, Al Qaeda have decided to actually make their own terrorist attacks?
What was gained by invading Iraq?
What was gained by invading Afghanistan? There won't be a victory, all that's going to happen is that a political excuse to withdraw is found, the talk is already happening.
Despite all the talk, if there's no victory in Afghanistan there's no way anyone will entertain invading Iran.
Who gains?
I can see you're very dedicated to making your point, but sometimes you can be stood so close to a tree, you can't see you're in a forest. Spin the whole thing around, it makes no sense.
Well to understand that is to understand the history of false flag terrorism by Governments. All major terror events drummed up on TV have all, yes, all been inside jobs. To understand this, an excellent documentary goes over the history and it will become very clear. When you have time watch it all, it's fascinating and the filmmaker made it free to see on YouTube. It's called Terrorstorm: A History Of Government Sponsored Terror. Let me know what you think after watching it.
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Just answer one factual question. Part of your proof of WTC 7's deliberate destruction is the absence of black box recorders in the debris. This you say is impossible because black boxes are 'indestructible'.
I say, and any aerospace engineers you care to ask will say, they are not indestructible, nothing is, and given the most extreme conditions (and i think we can agree the WTC site was about as extreme as it gets) the boxes could have been destroyed.
So, if the lack of black boxes can be rationally and reasonably explained, does that affect your theory?
I say, and any aerospace engineers you care to ask will say, they are not indestructible, nothing is, and given the most extreme conditions (and i think we can agree the WTC site was about as extreme as it gets) the boxes could have been destroyed.
So, if the lack of black boxes can be rationally and reasonably explained, does that affect your theory?
Ace Bandage
The one and only.
Occam's razor called. He said you're over thinking this.
That's really not that important but it's just another piece of evidence. Black boxes don't get destroyed in any crashes. But let's say the thermite melted them all that was used to melt the steel. That's understandable. Thermite = Controlled Demolition = Inside Job.
It's really important to understand how Governments routinely stage terror attacks to blame it on their enemies. That's called false flag terrorism.
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
This is why I love circular logic.
It's not that important - they why use it to counter arguments against you in earlier posts?
Black boxes do get destroyed in crashes - Boeing 737 Helios flight in Athens for instance
Ok, let's just say thermite did melt them. Nah, we can't - or rather, YOU can't. Why? You just said they can't be destroyed, so if they can't be destroyed, we can't say thermite melted them, can we?
And this continued thermite reference. Why not chicken soup? Or coca cola? Or any other substance you have no proof was there, but fits your theory.
BTW - black boxes are designed to withstand 1,200 degrees for 60 minutes. Tower fire heats were in excess of 1,500 for hours .....
2 + 2 does sometimes = four
NEXT ..........
Orange Cat have you ever watched Loose Change? There are so many more important questions regarding the attacks. I rank the black boxes way down the list.
How about the supposed fact the Government found an unscathed passport of one of the "hijackers" from the rubble of the twin towers. Now think of it this way. That passport survived a fireball unscathed and the black boxes were destroyed, uh huh.
That passport had to be planted. The evidence of a cover up and inside job keeps growing and growing. While we will never be able to prove every single thing with certainty, the body of evidence is overwhelming for inside job. We need a real investigation to bring down the criminals who did it.
Logic says that passport couldn't make it out. So it was planted.
How about the supposed fact the Government found an unscathed passport of one of the "hijackers" from the rubble of the twin towers. Now think of it this way. That passport survived a fireball unscathed and the black boxes were destroyed, uh huh.
That passport had to be planted. The evidence of a cover up and inside job keeps growing and growing. While we will never be able to prove every single thing with certainty, the body of evidence is overwhelming for inside job. We need a real investigation to bring down the criminals who did it.
Logic says that passport couldn't make it out. So it was planted.
there was a perfectly fine Bible found at the pennsylvania crash site. contrary to popular belief, there are numerous examples of paper items found at the scenes of plane crash sites, building fires, war zones and terror attacks
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Thank you for saving me the time of having to give a 101 on the basic principles of crash site wreckage distribution .. a single passport being found intact in a wreckage site that large is not only unremarkable, it's likely ...
And even if it was planted ... how does that prove WTC7 was 'pulled'. It just proves the passport was planted. And as the names of the hijackers were already known and continued to be established from numerous pre and post crash third party sources, the planting of one passport hardly seems necessary. In fact, it's gilding the lily, an act guaranteed to attract attention and have conspiracy nuts jumping up and down and pointing ...
So an indestructible black box that could quite feasibly be destroyed and a passport that could quite easily have survived the crashes ....
NEXT .......
WTC 7 was damaged and firefighters tried to save it. However, the damage was too great, the structure was unstable and therefore Silverstein told the fire Chief to "pull his men out" as saving the building was a lost cause.
Why does every big event have to be a friggin conspiracy. Jeez.
Wrong. Proof that the twoofers have no knowledge of aviation accidents.
Why does every big event have to be a friggin conspiracy. Jeez.
Wrong. Proof that the twoofers have no knowledge of aviation accidents.
Last edited:
Shifty
O.G.
WTC7WasPulled, it is in your best interest to stop asking everyone that disagrees with you if they've watched Loose Change.
Dylan Avery (writer, director, and editor of Loose Change) has his interpretation of United Airlines Flight 93 crash site evidence and testimony challenged by a BBC interviewer. Avery's bias is exposed by the BBC, who then do a followup interview with the crash scene coroner to seal the deal.
Dylan Avery explains how he set out to create a fictional work about 911, but after doing some research became convinced that his story was true. Things went downhill from there.
Dylan Avery (writer, director, and editor of Loose Change) has his interpretation of United Airlines Flight 93 crash site evidence and testimony challenged by a BBC interviewer. Avery's bias is exposed by the BBC, who then do a followup interview with the crash scene coroner to seal the deal.
Dylan Avery explains how he set out to create a fictional work about 911, but after doing some research became convinced that his story was true. Things went downhill from there.
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
alexpnz
Lord Dipstick
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Word!
Besides, ANY Youtube video longer than 5 mins is a MAJOR Fail!
YouTube - providing empirical evidence and reasoned logic since ..... eeerrrrr
FAIL
- Status
Similar threads
