Leaglize the Weed

Are you in favor of legalizing *********

  • Yes

    Votes: 130 70.7%
  • No

    Votes: 54 29.3%

  • Total voters
    184
I don't smoke and don't care to smoke. We should legalize and "commericialize" the production of ********* (much like *****)...offer people a safe product at a fair price. Regulate it. Tax it. Treat it like *****.


This works well in the Netherlands - there are places to go to legally buy the stuff, there are limits (well, in theory anyway ;)) on the amount you can buy in one go and yet the country isn't full of lazy ****** stoners or psychotic head cases.

Hardcore porn and prostitution is also legal there too. Makes you think, huh?


*total stoner and proud of it*
 
I've never touched the stuff, but i'm for legalising it.

...Anything which makes the goverment give us a little shred of freedom.
What ever happened to the 60's? :(
 
Legalise it, and tax it... I'd still be a happy man if I can get a joint or two some nights of the week without feeling like I'm doing society some great injustice, reclassified to a B class **** here... excuse my childish mood but my GOVERNMENT ARE WANKERS, ok it's off my chest ;)

and in me lungs :)
 
It should be legalized all around the world. But then again the US and it's DEA would have to come up with a new excuse to fuck up things in Latin America. Oh right there would still be the **** and the menace of **** dealers. With this i'm not saying that they are innocent people it's just that states fighting against it use it for their own benefit and way often do much more horrible and violent things that these people do. I also think that money laundry would get lower.
 
it's awfully hypocritical to have tobacco and its tax revenues, yet a much less addictive/dangerous **** is prohibited. right now, the ********* biz is dominated by a bunch of low lifes who use intimidation and ******** to corner the market and drive prices way up. all this for something which is less detrimental to human health than ******* or big macs, let alone cigarettes.
 
That green font almost made me not read it.
Anyways, I think that's a bad idea, and I'm not only speaking from a non-smoker point of view.
There are alot of reasons, we all know what ***** do to your body and I'd **** to see 13 years old **** doing ***** now and ruining their life; the amount of junkies will grow and thus the amount of crime and all of the other stuff junkies do (too obvious and known to elaborate).

I know I didnt explain it the best but you know what I mean.
To sum up, keep it ******* and keep using it if you like.

That was the laziest, WORST argument I have ever read. I don't even know where to begin. 13 year old **** DO ***** and ruin their lives, and plenty don't. As far as ***** doing harm to one's body, this isn't a poll about legalizing smack......pot does no real known harm to one's body. To say the amount of junkies will grow, and thus crime will increase.....good God! You present nothing but conservative rhetoric there. Your closing argument is just awful....it proposes no solution to the problem, but instead you seem to be one to advocate the current "solution". That is, let's let the U.S. CONTINUALLY flush millions of dollars down the toilet to fight a pointless "war", and let those daring enough continue to break the law. I'm sorry if that was harsh.....I am not attacking you personally. Just that response.

I would rather have had Mr. Mackey's response.
 
ok first off ********* is not the gate way ****.. cigarettes and ******* are.. why ? cause they are legal. now people are afraid that ********* becomes legal, **** will jump to it.. look **** are gonna do what they want. to the parents:instead of being scared, be prepared. parents are a hugh, big, should be automatic influence on thier **** life.. thats where it starts. everything you do is a responsiblity
 
Sure!!!!!! :)
 
Premium Link Upgrade

Oregon is toying with the idea too...

Why the **** was or is lost...

A great read!

Premium Link Upgrade

You know, removing the argument about ********* for a second, this story really highlights a lot of what is compounding a lot of political issues. Oregon shouldn't even bother, California has tried it, and while I know San Francisco still has places to get legal *********, the vast majority of places I've heard about have been broken up. It's simple: federal law trumps state law, so why waste the time and money?
 
Back
Top