Kansas governor signs bill banning Islamic law

[Will E Worm]

Hey college professor..... you of all people should know we don't live in a Democracy.

:1orglaugh

:clap:

Don't forget their insane liquor laws. They are basically like Utah. Kansas has 2 percent less alcohol in their beer. Lots of people from Kansas go to Missouri for their booze.

Why odn't they live there if they like it so much? :tongue:

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

*Furiously rubbing one out to images of Kirk Cameron*

 

[lurkingdirk]

Sheesh, Sam and Will have certainly started cuddling.
That's the most educational thing in this thread.

 

[xfire]

For you imbeciles who think it's okay, watch this. After it finishes, let's see if you still support Sharia Law.

Who posted that it was "okay"? Who posted that they support it? :clown:

 

[Deepcover]

I'm glad because Muslims are sneaky bastards. We got enough of them here in Canada and once muslim folks get the money to build a church within a community, that's it. They WILL take over (including laws and such). I also don't like them because they only care about themselves and their own people.

 

[ballzano]

PK is just here to act like a clown.

No one wants Shar'ia law. They just want to complain.

Dammit! I cannot rep you

 

[Supafly]

Hello guys, I am back online

I have a hard time that we can't agree on the separation of ANY church and state. Otherwise we would be live in a country like Iran or Israel. Both terribly wrong concepts, with terrible things happening because of it.

I may be wrong, but isn't there a passage in the US Constitution on the separation of church and state?

Clearly, especially the shariah, in it's extremest form is absolutely a terrible law-system. Maybe looking into it's actual details might help opponents of the newly-signed bill reconsider:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

 

[Sam Fisher]

Fuck those rag head, sharia law mother fuckers @ the 20 second mark of the video

 

[PirateKing]

PK is just here to act like a clown.

No one wants Shar'ia law. They just want to complain.

Hey, at least I'm a clown who doesn't take himself seriously.

 

[Will E Worm]

Hey, at least I'm a clown who doesn't take himself seriously.

You're just a clown, nothing serious there.

Some topics are serious.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Supadupafly

I have a hard time that we can't agree on the separation of ANY church and state. Otherwise we would be live in a country like Iran or Israel. Both terribly wrong concepts, with terrible things happening because of it.

I may be wrong, but isn't there a passage in the US Constitution on the separation of church and state?

Clearly, especially the shariah, in it's extremest form is absolutely a terrible law-system. Maybe looking into it's actual details might help opponents of the newly-signed bill reconsider

The first amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. Nowhere in the Constitution does the phrase "separation of church and state" appear. That comes from the private writings of Thomas Jefferson. In essence it means, to me anyway, that the gummint shall not show preference for one religion, or lack of it, over another.

 

[D-rock]

The first amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. Nowhere in the Constitution does the phrase "separation of church and state" appear. That comes from the private writings of Thomas Jefferson. In essence it means, to me anyway, that the gummint shall not show preference for one religion, or lack of it, over another.

Of course if you go at from a rational point of view we do have freedom of religion as a right, and combined that with the fact it's practically impossible to have freedom of religion without also having freedom FROM religion and in any rational de facto sense yes we have a separation of church and state. Otherwise that whole freedom of religion stuff isn't valid if somebody has to live under another religions rules when they don't effect anybody else by what they do. That's not freedom of religion.

 

[Johan]

I may be wrong, but isn't there a passage in the US Constitution on the separation of church and state?

Separation of Chruch and State, in the Constitution of a country wich motto is "In God we trust" and whose president takes oath on the Bible at the beginning of his mandate ? You must be kiddin' !

Clearly, especially the shariah, in it's extremest form is absolutely a terrible law-system. Maybe looking into it's actual details might help opponents of the newly-signed bill reconsider:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

The problem with the Shar'Ia is that its a law that's been written about 1500 years ago. And since it's a divine law, it can't be modified.
Many civilisations had such cruel laws. Even jews. The Torah says adultery people should be stoned to death.

If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death, the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife.

Deut. 22 ; 23:24

 

[vodkazvictim]

The Torah says adulterer's should be stoned to death.

As a married man I'd welcome that punishment even without committing adultery. Somebody, please, is a mercy killing too much to ask?

Back on topic, the people who did this in Kansas obviously haven't realised that there's a whole new financial market out there known as Sharia safe loans.