So, to be clear, you think it is a good thing that the government is mandating this, but you think the government should not get involved with seat belt laws?
Your ability to think critically is entirely in question. You like this law, therefore, the government should do it. You don't like seat belt laws, therefore the government shouldn't do it. And what on earth would happen if the United States of America's government made some law that banned some type of Christian law? You would be absolutely outraged.
So, what has been shown in this seemingly innocuous post is Will E. Worm's complete lack of ability to see beyond his own preferences, and to think critically. You think very much the same way a four year old does - if you like something, it's clearly "right." If you don't like something, it's clearly "wrong." What you are in fact expressing has absolutely nothing to do with correct or incorrect, it has to do only with your own, short-sighted, vision of how the world should be. This makes arguing with you completely pointless, as you are basing nothing you say on fact, but simply on opinion. It's incredibly easy to feel smug when you do that, isn't it? I should tell you, however, it does make you come off as a little stupid.
I'm just letting you know. I hope you found this comment constructive, though I know you didn't. You don't like it, so clearly it is "wrong."
:tongue:
