Re: I find it difficult to believe ...
Aren't you also being a bit one-sided?
You continue to avoid any recognition of the continued occupation and oppression exercised by Israel on the Palestinian people. This is an enormous point to overlook. So much so that it could lead someone to accuse you of engaging in the type of one-sided rhetoric you condemn.
This is certainly a significant element that lead bandanoantri to call Israel "as guilty" as groups such as Hamas. (to which you disagree) In fact, Carter would go further, he would say in this particular engagement Israel bears a greater responsibility.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfG8Mfg7TWw&feature=related
The other excellent point he makes is that the debate is actually MORE robust in Israel than in the United States. In most cases, it is not the Palestinian cause that benefits from sympathetic bias (in the U.S.) but Israel. In the United States there is a great failure to report on the atrocities regarding the Palestinians or recognize simple facts (such as that Israel is the occupier) and that "there is no doubt ... a strong aversion to criticizing Israel in this country. I wouldn't say it is all because of intimidation, but that is one factor".
Actually, Egypt's change is due largely to the US under the Carter administration, getting them to recognize Israel. I'll always praise and credit Carter for doing that.
I think you're views on Israel are very 1-sided.
Aren't you also being a bit one-sided?
You continue to avoid any recognition of the continued occupation and oppression exercised by Israel on the Palestinian people. This is an enormous point to overlook. So much so that it could lead someone to accuse you of engaging in the type of one-sided rhetoric you condemn.
This is certainly a significant element that lead bandanoantri to call Israel "as guilty" as groups such as Hamas. (to which you disagree) In fact, Carter would go further, he would say in this particular engagement Israel bears a greater responsibility.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfG8Mfg7TWw&feature=related
The other excellent point he makes is that the debate is actually MORE robust in Israel than in the United States. In most cases, it is not the Palestinian cause that benefits from sympathetic bias (in the U.S.) but Israel. In the United States there is a great failure to report on the atrocities regarding the Palestinians or recognize simple facts (such as that Israel is the occupier) and that "there is no doubt ... a strong aversion to criticizing Israel in this country. I wouldn't say it is all because of intimidation, but that is one factor".