I am running for president in 2012

try reading through the rest of the thread. it might help answer whatever questions you have regarding my apparent racism which is actually just the usage of an analogy to make a point. hardly an endorsement of any particular policy of racial oppression.

just the wrong analogy!

If you're really trying to "become president", don't piss off 13% of the population because everyone knows we control what goes down in this country. Duh!!!
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
I would like to announce my decision to run for president of the U.S. in the 2012 election. I will be running as an independent candidate and am currently searching for a running mate. Here is my initial 10 Point Program for Change. It's change you can believe in! Yes we can! Waddams in 2012!

1. Direct election of Supreme Court justices.
2. Outlaw parents hitting children.
3. Legalize public nudity.
4. 13th grade added to high school.
5. Federal standard for statutory rape laws.
6. Subsidize organic food.
7. Legalize postmortem cannibalism.
8. Constitutional amendment to abolish underwear.
9. Return lands wrongfully taken from Native Americans.
10. Legalize peyote.

You just lost about 99.99999% of the votes.

And the country :rolleyes: Also the rest of the shit gets a :dunno: whatever from me. But for #10 you get my vote!
 
just the wrong analogy!

If you're really trying to "become president", don't piss off 13% of the population because everyone knows we control what goes down in this country. Duh!!!

what is wrong with the analogy? and don't tell me no nudist has ever been lynched or enslaved. although i can't say for sure there haven't been nudist lynchings or forms of enslavement, even if there wasn't, that doesn't deny the correspondence between hypothetically segregating blacks because whites think they are ugly and a majority of prudes persecuting nudists because they think my cock is ugly. Civil rights for Cocks and Cunts now!
 
if you think a trillion dollar deficit is bad, wait until you try to return all native american lands (which is basically all of the country).

"subisize organic farming" - what kind of socialistic crap is that?

you certainly would not get my vote as your platform is short-sighted and stupid
 
what is wrong with the analogy? and don't tell me no nudist has ever been lynched or enslaved. although i can't say for sure there haven't been nudist lynchings or forms of enslavement, even if there wasn't, that doesn't deny the correspondence between hypothetically segregating blacks because whites think they are ugly and a majority of prudes persecuting nudists because they think my cock is ugly. Civil rights for Cocks and Cunts now!

Well, I think you just called me ugly?

And who are these "white people", because it doesn't seem a lot of people agree with anything you're saying? :dunno:
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
Hey Chef Chi, look at post number 40 in this thread and see if you can get the right answer since WIll E hasn't answered yet.

It proves that Indians populated this land before we landed here and we forced them out. That uh...that hurts your argument you moron.

Try harder next time.
 
Go ahead and run. I'll still vote for Chuck Norris again. :thumbsup:
 
It proves that Indians populated this land before we landed here and we forced them out. That uh...that hurts your argument you moron.

Try harder next time.

there were land deals with the cherokees before the indian removal act/trail of tears. in order to demonstrate 100% of cherokee land was wrongfully acquired by the U.S., you'd have to demonstrate all cherokee land before, during and after the removal act was not acquired legally/morally. same logic goes for any other tribe and whatever piece of legislation/treaty making is relevant to the particular geographical location.

hopefully this is sufficiently clear.
 
"subisize organic farming" - what kind of socialistic crap is that?

you're right, subisizing organic farming is quite stalinist. but SubSIdizing organic farming allows people who can't afford to buy healthy food to have the opportunity to get healthy food at a cheaper cost. but you are probably some type of libertarian or neo-con or whatever so i guess you think it's o.k. if healthy food goes to the rich and unhealthy food goes to the poor. have some sympathy for the children. for god's sake, will somebody think of the children!
 
Top